gatomontes99

Mimicking Romans does not make Romans fascist you morơn.

Same tactics as the porn actress. Make assumptions, redefine terms, apply unproven characteristics and then draw conclusion.

https://detectvideo.ai/ says it is pretty likely based on just the thumbnail.

The infrastructure we are destroying is their military complex.

Based on what evidence?

All outlets use old footage when they don't have the new footage yet. Maybe they had an issue with the truck that communicates with the home office. Who knows. The fact that they used the actual footage once they had it and before beaver could get his panties in a wad, tells us they had no issue with the real footage.

He is serving now dipshit.

36 states have voter ID laws. Sooooo....14 states would need the laws....annnnnnd the states (36) already have subsidies for those that need them.....are you getting there yet? I did not day it proves citizenship. I said it is one of the approved IDs for the SAVE Act. I also said a few states list the citizenship on the ID of the owner can prove citizenship. So, those do prove citizenship even if that is not accepted...yet. Bullshit! Congress: Specifically, the bill prohibits states from accepting and processing an application to register to vote in a federal election unless the applicant presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. The bill specifies what documents are considered acceptable proof of U.S. citizenship, such as identification that complies with the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates U.S. citizenship. Lmao...ok. So you don't want to admit you didn't notice that you used registrations and I used votes. Whatever.

Just one. They hate America. Trump loves America. So they must hate Trump.

It is literally inly 14 states. The states I listed do list citizenship and the SAVE Act lists those Rela IDs as acceptable. What exactly are you arguing? Enhanced IDs are different than a Real ID with Citizenship status. Registered is not voted. The study goes on to say that just over 6% voted. I quoted the voted part. Try to pay attention. 1 million illegal voters is not a fictional problem.

The SCOTUS ruled that requiring an ID can amount to a poll tax. So every state with an ID requirement has implemented some sort of subsidy for the poor. Problem solved. In the following states, the Real ID indicates citizenship: Alaska, Michigan, Maine, New Hampshire, Nevada, New York, Washington. I quoted just facts because the study is behind a pay wall. Edit: Snopes is not a reputable source. That has clearly been shown. They are part of the IFCN cabal that is owned and operated by an extremist left wing pundit. There is nothing about SNOPES that is fair, balanced or factual. However, the study I quoted said 6%. You quoted some study that claimed 10-20%. Do you think that, maybe, a Trump friendly state might have voter ID laws? And that those states probably don't issue IDs to illegal aliens? It would stand to reason that those states do have lower illegal alien voters AND that is a result of the very same laws that the SAVE Act is making national. So you proved my point.

Sarcasm isn't a lie. A lie has the intent to deceive. He had no intentent to deceive.

Dude! That straw man fell right down. What a Mike Tyson v Marvis Frazier moment! It is almost like that straw man threw the fight!

Every Word!

Americans Can Apply for Real ID Without Any Cost—Here’s What You Need to Do! Some states do, mine does. I didn't know other states did not. I showed a peer reviewed study that was published in a scientific journal. You showed me a news report. Forgive me if I don't change my view.

They just don't want to show their support for her. Deep down, they know they are as horrible as she is.

How can you possibly know that? Seriously. We deidentify ballots for voter security so liberals can't use our ballot as a reason to attack us through the legal system as one example. You should be aware that you are parroting "facts' that are not facts: Just facts - In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studies published a groundbreaking study by three scholars who estimated how frequently non-citizens were illegally voting. Based on data for the 2008 presidential and congressional elections, the study found that: “roughly one quarter of non-citizens” in the U.S. “were likely registered to vote.” “6.4% of non-citizens actually voted.” 81.8% of them “reported voting for Barack Obama.” illegal votes cast by non-citizens “likely” changed “important election outcomes” in favor of Democrats, “including Electoral College votes” and a “pivotal” U.S. Senate race that enabled Democrats to pass Obamacare. The study’s voter registration rate was estimated with data from two key sources: A national survey in which 14.8% of non-citizens admitted that they were registered to vote. A database of registered voters that reveals what portion of the surveyed non-citizens “were in fact registered” even though “they claimed not to be registered.” *********** At 18.6 million illegal aliens, 6% is 1 million illegal votes. So, is it a nonproblem?

Yes. More hoops to jump through. But still less than to go to the doctor. Also, yes, we are trying to suppress votes. We are trying to suppress ILLEGAL votes. Is that so horrible?

Every...single...state: As of 2026, all U.S. states are compliant with the REAL ID Act... The digital ID is not valid in most states. The Real ID is 100% implemented. States IDs are free and all states are issuing Real ID compliant IDs.

Real ID requires proof of citizenship. So, if your Driver's License has a star on it, you are a citizen. If you have a passport, you are a citizen. If you have a SSN, a quick search in the federal database shows citizen or legal resident. None of this is hard. None of it is preventing legal citizens from getting registered to vote. None of it prevents legal citizens from voting. None of it adds a significant financial burden. In fact, 36 states have proof of citizenship and voter ID laws with no significant issues. There is no poll tax. There is no Jim Crowe 2.0 (we aren't democrats in the south). There is no suppression of married women (who tend to vote republican).

AOC is not radical enough any more. She's old news. The left is going through a prolonged extinction burst. They lost their ideological hold on the government so they are acting out like petulant little children. Usually an extinction burst is short lived, but they are so devastated that it just keeps going.

This "unorganized" group has a communication system, a logo, a set of common goals, an operating hand book, a uniform and funding. Explain to me how that is not organized?

And yet still more popular than every democrat. Even ICE is more popular than the democrat party.

Your OPINION means nothing. You are a LIAR!

Mediaite.com I laughed so hard when I saw this. Newsome can't keep up with Trump and ICE is more popular than the Democrat party. Independe ts don't like the radical ideology that the left has embraced.