gatomontes99

You keep trying to call them peaceful protestors. They are not peaceful. That is you, making excuses for them. As for due process, I have proven you are wrong. I cant make you accept that. The law is what it is and you either accept it or you don't. The reality here is not that you are upset by the law or by people being deported. You are upset because "Orange Man Bad."

Oh look. They are here remodeling a delivery van.

Have you denounced the riots? Because later in this post you went on to make excuses for them. Yes, calling Trump a fascist is inflammatory rhetoric. Trump exhibits zero traits of a fascist regime. As was pointed out in other threads fascists don't: Cut taxes Reduce the size of government End wars Create new trade agreements with friendly and adversarial regimes Hold fair elections Abide by elections that are clearly flawed Promote small business Reduce penalties for minorities You are the one that is lying. You are the one using fascism as if it is defined by the emotion it elicits in you rather than the true definition. You want to call me a liar and the post this? That is rich! Is this just a peaceful bonfire? And they were just helping these cops collect bricks and broken scooters by throwing them off a bridge at them? And these fireworks are just in celebration of their successful demonstration? The admin isn't breaking the law. I posted the law. Expedited removal is acceptable for aliens here without papers for up to two years. You posted that the administration can have hearings in absentia and that that was an Obama era policy. Every time you say that Trump is breaking the law, you are knowingly misrepresenting reality. That is the true definition of lying. Not the emotional definition of "I dont like what you said" that you are using.

I'm really not. I am calling you out for having inflammatory rhetoric that supports the violence in LA and several other cities now. You are the one trying to dehumanize me. To be clear, I am holding you to civil standards while you are creating justification to attack me. No. I am saying that due process has been applied: What that is saying is that the government must abide by rights and follow processes as written in law. I quoted the process above. You just don't know what you are talking about. And, again, you attack me and try to dehumanize me. All because you were ignorant regarding the law.

Honestly, if I were POTUS, I would seriously consider bombing the fentanyl ingredients factories, among other ways to disable those death factories.

Here you go doubters:

And Trump will forgive him. So that ends that.

You aren't just saying this stuff to friends and family. You put it on the internet. The entire world can see it. You are contributing to the normalization af radicalization. You are part of the problem. There is no due process for expedited removal. That has always been the law. What was a violation of the law was releasing aliens subject to removal even if they were claiming asylum. What was also illegal was issuing them SSN and work permits: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/235.3 "(ii) No entitlement to hearings and appeals. Except as otherwise provided in this section, such alien is not entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge in proceedings conducted pursuant to section 240 of the Act, or to an appeal of the expedited removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. " "(iii) Detention and parole of alien in expedited removal. An alien whose inadmissibility is being considered under this section or who has been ordered removed pursuant to this section shall be detained pending determination and removal. " "(ii) Detention pending credible fear interview. Pending the credible fear determination by an asylum officer and any review of that determination by an immigration judge, the alien shall be detained. " The laws above don't require a hearing.

You are giving them the moral authority to break the law. They are using your language. Good thing none of that is happening. Just because you label it as such doesn't mean it is so. You've defined these things by how they make you feel and not by reality.

No it's perfectly fine to oppose a politician. Encouraged even. But, rhetoric like fascist, Hitler, threat to democracy, etc are giving these protestors the imagined moral authority to use violence. Because of people like you, they have justification (in theor monds) for trying to kill police.

Didn't you insist that Trump was a criminal for NOT deploying NG troops on J6 WITHOUT permission from either the DC mayor or the House Majority Leader? Why is it that this time you insist he can't do it?

You misspelled communist, fascist, authoritarian dictator.

And posts like this are what incite violence. See LA.

I told you this was being funded and created: ...and...

Even the judge shopping couldn't save Newsom's bid to let his own people suffer at the hands of left wing radicals.

Didn't you say Trump should be impeached for not deploying the NG on J6, without the DC Mayor's or Pelosi's permission?

Sorry, I was using your post to highlight that RoboSmith isn't believed and not directly responding to you. My bad.

Don't you want to prove how manly you are since you are such a big tough strong man? See, that's not so hard is it? Btw, totally AI generated for comedic value.

It is like you are willfully ignorant: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/235.3 (b) Expedited removal—(1) Applicability. The expedited removal provisions shall apply to the following classes of aliens who are determined to be inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C) or (7) of the Act: (i) Arriving aliens, as defined in 8 CFR 1.2; (ii) As specifically designated by the Commissioner, aliens who arrive in, attempt to enter, or have entered the United States without having been admitted or paroled following inspection by an immigration officer at a designated port-of-entry, and who have not established to the satisfaction of the immigration officer that they have been physically present in the United States continuously for the 2-year period immediately prior to the date of determination of inadmissibility. The Commissioner shall have the sole discretion to apply the provisions of section 235(b)(1) of the Act, at any time, to any class of aliens described in this section. The Commissioner's designation shall become effective upon publication of a notice in the Federal Register. However, if the Commissioner determines, in the exercise of discretion, that the delay caused by publication would adversely affect the interests of the United States or the effective enforcement of the immigration laws, the Commissioner's designation shall become effective immediately upon issuance, and shall be published in the Federal Register as soon as practicable thereafter. When these provisions are in effect for aliens who enter without inspection, the burden of proof rests with the alien to affirmatively show that he or she has the required continuous physical presence in the United States. Any absence from the United States shall serve to break the period of continuous physical presence. An alien who was not inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States but who establishes that he or she has been continuously physically present in the United States for the 2-year period immediately prior to the date of determination of inadmissibility shall be detained in accordance with section 235(b)(2) of the Act for a proceeding under section 240 of the Act.

Remember when Democrats were appalled that Trump didn't call in the National Guard in DC? Now they are appalled that he did. Mark my words. This is not an organic riot. https://crowdsondemand.com/protests-rallies-and-advocacy 8484 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 515 Beverly Hills, CA 90211

It's an exemption not a right.

Completely nonsensical. Where are the parallels? Are you just making shịt up? Because it really sounds like you are just making shịt up.

I can't think of a valid reason not to. If someone asks you if a 5 year old did that, you just say "Hell yeah he did. Look how strong my boy is!"

Why would the top women's gymnast support men taking over women's sports? That's just insane.