gatomontes99

Well, if they assume Republicans will get them to that goal, it is because they beleive (like Democrats) that minorities can't succeed without government intervention.

It doesn't need to go there and we do need two. But you have to remember that the two we have are 40+ years old and the aircraft we have ordered aren't being delivered on time. Taking this one and converting it to an AF1 is not a bad option. Now, sending it to Trump's library is a choice he made. He likes trophies. No. He loves Trophies. Having a big asś jet in front of his "Big Beautiful Library the likes of which nobody has seen" fits his ego.

No one said 4 years. You assumed that.

First, Trump doesn't get it. Second, Boeing has had delays in building the AF1 replacements. Third, everything we pay to update the Qatar aircraft, we are paying to do with the Boeing aircraft. So there isn't really an additional cost.

We always knew he was a nazi.

Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

Your lack of self awareness is staggering.

It is no more a gift to Trump than the Statue of Liberty was a gift to Grover Cleveland.

Remember that? If he was talking about Prostate Cancer, it starts to make sense now. Prostate cancer drugs have side effects that align with his behavior: muscle weakness, slurred speech, memory loss etc. PMSNBC actually had America's top oncologist on to talk about his diagnosis. He said that Joe Biden almost certainly had the cancer AT THE START OF HIS PRESIDENCY. Watch:

I suppose you think it's a coincidence that the Palestinian terrorists released an American around the time a new trade deal was struck with Qatar?

And the book Jake Tapper put his name on said that if Joe fell one more time he might be confined to a wheelchair. I thought that meant because of his age, but this adds speculation to how much they knew.

He/she is trying to be more brave.

That is absolutely awful. Forcing parents to abuse their kids is the final straw. That state government should be dissolved and reestablished by the federal government.

Now he endorses Jill Stein. Because he loves him some communism. Don't you support Jill Stein? I guess you and David Duke have a lot in common.

⭐⭐⭐

David Duke endorsed Jill Stein. Newsweek

You were bullied in school, weren't you? I can tell because you seem like the kind of guy that had no sense of humor. Kids usually pick on kids like that because it is funny. You've got to mature and learn to detect when people are screwing with you. Seriously. You live in Cali. Get some weed. Chill.

There is a reason rule #1 is rule #1. But you've added such a unique twist. I quoted the USA Today, the Constitution and Merriam Webster. But you tried to disparage what I said by attacking FoxNews. That is hilarious. How bad must your argument be that you have to attack a source I didn't even use! Wow. Just wow. Actually, the SCOTUS ruled on Wong Kim Ark. He was the son of two legal immigrants in the United States that was confirmed to have birthright citizenship based on the 14th amendment, after being denied entry to the US. However, the big difference between Wong Kim Ark and the children of illegal aliens is that his parents were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Illegal aliens are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Appeal to authority fallacies can sometimes be convincing. But, when you don't understand what you are talking about, they just make you look bad. Maybe next time you should try reading a reliable and unbiased source. You know...like FoxNews

"'It's so clearly the right decision,' Ben Rhodes, an Obama national security aide" "'...awed by his willingness to brazenly shatter so many harmful taboos,' Malley said to Axios."

It looks like the counsel of presidents just couldn't handle the world's problems and they are "in awe" of Trump's decisive and correct actions in the ME.

Nothing at all? What does get rid of mean? Where did 8647 start? Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk Note the article was written on April 2nd, almost two weeks before Comey posted 8647 on his feed. He has TDS something fierce. There is no way he didn't know what it meant. He clearly thought it was important enough to share and there is no way he shared it because he didn't know what it meant.

The people your idols told them to vote for, because they are stupid enough to believe your lies. Jill Stein. The NYTs: We Can Replace Them Do I? White Nationalist Richard Spencer Votes for Joe Biden I mean, that's two prominent Neonazi/white supremacists voting for the socialist green party and democratic party. Maybe your bigoted mind has made conclusions, but that's your sin, not mine.

The SCOTUS is just ruling on whether or not a federal judge that is assigned a region of the country has the right to issue a national injunction. It seems to me, that the most appropriate source of a nation wide injunction would come from the SCOTUS. Judge shopping by choosing regions with friendly judges all the way up to the federal level to get a nation wide injunction is an end around play. Rather than relying on the merits of the case, they relied on the loyalty of the the left. If the SCOTUS is reasonable, they will limit nationwide injunctions to SCOTUS. As for the 14th amendment and birthright citizenship, there is no birthright citizenship for visitors. Here is the relevant text of the 14th: The first sentence is what the EO that POTUS signed, is all about. In it's original intent, people that were born here and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, would become citizens. The word "and' is vitally important. It delineates that just being born with in the boundaries of the United States is not a qualification. One must be born AND "subject to the jurisdiction" of the Untied States. "Subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" is where those that suppo rt birthrights for everyone have tried to change the meaning of the Amendment. "Subject to the jurisdiction" has been redefined to mean anyone that must follow our laws. Their belief is that jurisdiction has to do with legal matters. That isn't true. Jurisdiction means: "2a: the authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate." The federal government and the state have no authority to govern or legislate people that do not live here. While they are here, they have to obey our laws. That is why they call it the "law of the land" and not the "law of the people". To finish defining the phrase, Subject (in this context) means: (2): one who lives in the territory of, enjoys the protection of, and owes allegiance to a sovereign power or state. A foreign national, that has no right to live in the United States, would not fit into this definition. We can look to two examples in history (at the time) that add context: Indians and Mexicans in Texas. Indians that lived in tribes and did not consider themselves part of the United States, did not enjoy birthright citizenship. The same was true for Mexicans. They were given a choice when Texas joined the United States. They could leave or they could stay and become citizens. They were not, automatically, given citizenship for being born. The second half of the citizenship clauses establishes that the United States determines who is a citizen and who is not. "Birthright" is specifically listed as a privilege and not a right. This was intended to prevent slave states from attempting to remove citizenship via legislation. In short, the 14th does not give all persons born within our borders citizenship. It does give all persons born to citizens and legal residents ( as defined by the immigration statutes).

Whitewash....I see what you did there

Yes. Per the links above, the southern whites rejected the racism and violence of the Democratic party.