CdnFox

that's literally saying it's racist. What democrats don't realize is how racist THEY sound. What you're saying is that black people are too stupid to get id. Black people are destined to be poor and make up such a large percent of the poor population that the fact you'd also get white poor people who vote republican is inconsequential - white people just aren't poor. We're supposed to believe that black people are some sort of child who need their hand held or they won't be able to vote. They can vote the same as everyone else, and they can get id same as everyone else. it's zero barrier. When id requirements were brought in in canada, nothing changed with the poor or marginalized voting.

THere are lots of efforts to prevent people from getting a gun if they're criminal or unsafe, even in the US. I posted as much. So once again you have to lie to make your point - which probably means you don't have a very good point. Meanwhile - someone decides it's ok to kill someone and they plan it and think about it, and decide they'll use a gun rather than one of the ohter many tools available ... and somenow it's the gun's fault, not the person. Yeah - you're REALLY taking this seriously. We can tell. You ARE sacrificing kids for guns currently and you're feeing good about yourself. If the left wing weren't disgusting liars fixated on guns because it's become fashionable to do so, then reasonable discussions could be held. But they're not. And they don't give a hoot about kids being killed. If the left REALLY thought bans were the answer, why hasn't biden done an assault weapon ban? Well?

well it would to a fascist.

I think you like to tell a story. But there's lots of liars here I talk to. I don't stick my head in the sand like you do and pretend otherwise, Hogwash. Nationalism itself is being attacked, so showing any devotion to it is also going to be attacked. If nationalism is wrong then obivously to those who subscribe to that BEING nationalistic is also wrong. It's entirely relevant.' You just don't want to deal with it Literally what he said and there's plenty of proof, it's been everywhere. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-calls-unvaccinated-canadians-racists-misogynists-in-unhinged-interview/ https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1545278/Justin-Trudeau-Tonia-Buxton-antivaxxers-racist-mysogynistic-Emmanuel-Marcon-VN https://news.yahoo.com/trudeau-canadians-protested-him-racist-210500788.html So in other words you can't refute what i say and you're going to pretend to stick your head in the sand and it's all the marxist's fault. You're a coward and a fool. LOL - i don't think you get how ignore works

Yeah - that's about the size of it "We want to give a group whom we feel is more likely to vote for us a special voting benefit others don't get!!" Why don't we just give them the same as everyone else?" You MONSTER - how could you REPRESS and SUPPRESS them like that!?@?!?!!?

Clearly he's a nazi. - antifa probably

Sounds fake. Is it? Or are they still tearing down statues of John a? Your attempt to dismiss it suggests you know there's truth to it. You mean the guy who said a third of canada is bigoted mysoginists who shouldn't be tolerated? That guy? And the one who has claimed canada commited genocide (but china didn't)? That PM?

OHHH NOOOOOEEESSSS now it's going to be ... no harder than it is for anyone else. Yawn. voter suppression my ass. And Canada has better voter turnout and we already require ID. Soooo yeah, not really a barrier

Typical. He said tracking the sale is pointless. Not that you just freely distribute firearms up and down the street. But he's right - a nut bar planning a mass shooting doesn't care if his gun is registered. The gun registry in Canada made NO difference to gun crime. The handgun registry still doesn't. It DOES make it easier to confiscate guns tho. Gee i wonder why leftists like you want a gun registry. (Spoiler - it ain't for public safety).

Dude you are not only anti gun you're also a bigot and believe those who OWN guns don't mind seeing other people die. So you're also a liar and hypocrite. Eff off with your fake concern about people. All you care about is that it makes it easier to virtue signal. when some mental health case hurts someone.

But all you do is prove how stupid you are so.. oh wait, i see your point now.

Ahhh yes - your facebook degree I forgot CBC probably taught you that's what other people are like. It's not true. Sorry kiddo.

Well no, they're not. Sandy hook - gun was stolen from mother. Columbine - guns were stolen from family. Killings at the border - guns were given to them by american gov't under fast and furious. Sometimes they're bought legally but - so was the truck that killed 80 plus people in france. So was the truck full of fertilizer that the unibomber used. Pretty sure the airplanes that crashed into the world trade centers were lawfully owned and licensed. Knives kill more people than rifles specificaly are reported to, all legally owned. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/ So what's your point? We don't go Ummm - most states do require a background eheck even if you're not a licensed gun dealer. Especially for handguns. https://www.findlaw.com/consumer/consumer-transactions/private-gun-sale-laws-by-state.html So you lied. And here we go again. The left HAS to LIE to try to make it's point becuase otherwise it doesn't have a point. You care more about lying that you do about people. Sorry - that's still you. That's why democrats aren't pushing to have more background checks, they're pushing to ban guns. You don't care if people are killed or not - or if people have background checks or anything else. You ONLY care about banning guns. And more importantly PRETENDING that's the most important thing. I mean if you're so seriousa bout it why didn't biden already reinstate the assault rifle ban? Ohhhh yeaaahhh - then you'd have to admit it makes no difference

As with most terms, the left and certain social justice warriors just use 'colonial' to mean 'people and things i don't like (but actually wouldn't give up). If you look at any political circumstance over time there's pros and cons. THe first nations practiced slavery. THey sold their women as chattel. They frequently wiped out OTHER first nations with whom they feuded. Soooo - how was that better than being a colony? Or may be it was better. The point is, any system of governance has pro's and cons. Calling things "colonial" is just a way of pretending that anything that's gone wrong with governance in the last few hundred years isn't their fault too.

Now now - he's still learning. Not everyone can be stupid from the FIRST word like you, he has to work up to it.

None of them say that FOS lies or refuses to report anything - YOU LIED! "NO NEED to LISTEN to ^^^^^^this OPINION without FACTS!!!!!!!!"

"NO NEED to LISTEN to ^^^^^^this OPINION without FACTS!!!!!!!!"

What a good little mindless drone you are did the cbc teach you that?

Probably "owtch my concussion and brain injury still hurts" i'm guessing? I frequently step on bugs too but i don't bother to think about them

ISn't that sort of what 'considering' means? I didn't think it was terribly misleading

I'm saying it's sensationalized and of low quality research. Truthful or not would depend on the specific story. A five year old may report on something and be absolutely truthful about what he believes he saw or what happened, but that does not mean he's accurate That may be the case but you'd need a better source than that to make any kind of definitive statement. In any case - perhaps not surprising it seems to be wrong. there have been accusations. true or not. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-13-year-old-girl-reemerges-in-light-of-defamation-lawsuit/ar-AA18DunI

yeah - that's my bad. I was being entirely sarcastic with calling it racist and obviously i didn't make that clear enough. It was more like 'black's ok, brown's ok, yellow is ok, but white? - that's racist. ' It was supposed to be mimicking a typical leftie response. Sorry for the confusion

You're going to social justice hell now. You realize that right?

Why wouldn't they? I mean - pretty much everyone's ancestors had SOMETHING positive to be proud of and remembering that and realizing we have the chance to build on their accomplishments is wonderful. Also - it helps kids feel like they're part of something bigger and that keeps them grounded. its actually very important. As long as you don't take it too far. Dude honestly - i find that point of view heartbreaking. And the path your forefathers had to take so that you could have the opportunites of today was far from just luck. Our ancestry can inspire us, make us greatful for what they sacrificed and worked for so that we could exist and have what we have, it's a tie between the past and the future and puts our own lives into perspective in the big picture. It shows us what CAN be accomplished by people like ourselves and pushes us to accomplish more. Now - if ALL You're celebrating is your skin colour then yeah that's pretty pointless.

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/crtc-ban-fox-news-canadian-cable And here we go with the censoring.