CdnFox

Oh yeah - there was a bunch of that in variying degrees. Here's one: https://globalnews.ca/news/8602177/freedom-convoy-protest-us-far-right-support/ “It’s so incredibly scary and disappointing,” he told Global News in an interview from Chicago. “There’s a group now within the Republican Party that … is willing to go cross what I consider to be a red line — and that red line is to be promoting disruptive activity in our neighbour, friend and allies’ backyard,” he said. An of course the CBC claimed that the convoy was more than 50 percent funded by republicans from the us, and that it was a us driven thing. Of course it later turned out there was no such funding. It was even the russians at one point but mostly it was the Americans.

No they don't. IT's as easy for them as anyone else. Just like here in Canada where people need id as well. It's just not complicated.

But it isn't. You really are saying they're too stupid - OR too lazy and just don't care. And you haven't made your case that somehow all poor people vote democrat. You lie and you try to twist the truth to your agenda and then you get cranky when you get caught at it. And if there's no voter fraud - then you won't care about efforts to make sure of it right? Unless there is and you'd like to keep that door open.

He DID have a majority - why didn't he do it then? Why did he wait two years until he didn't have a majority anymore? So why didn't biden put that back in when he had a majority? Of course you are. You don't care about actual solutions. You just tell lies, like 'biden COULND"T POSSIBLY because NO MAJORITY" when in fact he did for 2 years. You DEEMAAAAAND solutions that will NOT stop a single killing but will make confiscating guns easier later. You won't talk about the actual shooters or how to address that, you ONLY want to talk about law that affect lawful gun owners. ANd you don't care about non gun violence - stab as many people as you like, only gun deaths matter to you. It's pretty sick. And then you try to push your own callous disregard for life on others. You should be deeply ashamed.

Every time with her - her hatred for jews is way over the top. She always brings them up and tries to claim they're the problems for everything and that's when she isn't just literally calling them nazis. What a disgusting person.

Commie jack boot fascists. LIke you, Obviously

Jezus christ are you attacking the jews again? Why the hell can't yo lefties ever just leave the jews alone. What is it about jews that attracts you authortarian types to hate them so much - nazi's, commies, antifa - they're all the same. Leave the jews alone, stop ragging on them, stop blaming them for everything, and stop calling them nazis. You're really starting to go over a line.

Well again - that's what you'd expect a super-woke fascist !diot to think. So... well done i guess?

I think it was "Visa Equityboom'

In your home that you tripled in value with a few renos you put on your credit card?

I"m saying fascists are stupid, and would arrive at stupid conclusions like that. But that was an easy mistake for a stupid fascist to make You're forgiven

that's literally saying it's racist. What democrats don't realize is how racist THEY sound. What you're saying is that black people are too stupid to get id. Black people are destined to be poor and make up such a large percent of the poor population that the fact you'd also get white poor people who vote republican is inconsequential - white people just aren't poor. We're supposed to believe that black people are some sort of child who need their hand held or they won't be able to vote. They can vote the same as everyone else, and they can get id same as everyone else. it's zero barrier. When id requirements were brought in in canada, nothing changed with the poor or marginalized voting.

THere are lots of efforts to prevent people from getting a gun if they're criminal or unsafe, even in the US. I posted as much. So once again you have to lie to make your point - which probably means you don't have a very good point. Meanwhile - someone decides it's ok to kill someone and they plan it and think about it, and decide they'll use a gun rather than one of the ohter many tools available ... and somenow it's the gun's fault, not the person. Yeah - you're REALLY taking this seriously. We can tell. You ARE sacrificing kids for guns currently and you're feeing good about yourself. If the left wing weren't disgusting liars fixated on guns because it's become fashionable to do so, then reasonable discussions could be held. But they're not. And they don't give a hoot about kids being killed. If the left REALLY thought bans were the answer, why hasn't biden done an assault weapon ban? Well?

well it would to a fascist.

I think you like to tell a story. But there's lots of liars here I talk to. I don't stick my head in the sand like you do and pretend otherwise, Hogwash. Nationalism itself is being attacked, so showing any devotion to it is also going to be attacked. If nationalism is wrong then obivously to those who subscribe to that BEING nationalistic is also wrong. It's entirely relevant.' You just don't want to deal with it Literally what he said and there's plenty of proof, it's been everywhere. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-calls-unvaccinated-canadians-racists-misogynists-in-unhinged-interview/ https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1545278/Justin-Trudeau-Tonia-Buxton-antivaxxers-racist-mysogynistic-Emmanuel-Marcon-VN https://news.yahoo.com/trudeau-canadians-protested-him-racist-210500788.html So in other words you can't refute what i say and you're going to pretend to stick your head in the sand and it's all the marxist's fault. You're a coward and a fool. LOL - i don't think you get how ignore works

Yeah - that's about the size of it "We want to give a group whom we feel is more likely to vote for us a special voting benefit others don't get!!" Why don't we just give them the same as everyone else?" You MONSTER - how could you REPRESS and SUPPRESS them like that!?@?!?!!?

Clearly he's a nazi. - antifa probably

Sounds fake. Is it? Or are they still tearing down statues of John a? Your attempt to dismiss it suggests you know there's truth to it. You mean the guy who said a third of canada is bigoted mysoginists who shouldn't be tolerated? That guy? And the one who has claimed canada commited genocide (but china didn't)? That PM?

OHHH NOOOOOEEESSSS now it's going to be ... no harder than it is for anyone else. Yawn. voter suppression my ass. And Canada has better voter turnout and we already require ID. Soooo yeah, not really a barrier

Typical. He said tracking the sale is pointless. Not that you just freely distribute firearms up and down the street. But he's right - a nut bar planning a mass shooting doesn't care if his gun is registered. The gun registry in Canada made NO difference to gun crime. The handgun registry still doesn't. It DOES make it easier to confiscate guns tho. Gee i wonder why leftists like you want a gun registry. (Spoiler - it ain't for public safety).

Dude you are not only anti gun you're also a bigot and believe those who OWN guns don't mind seeing other people die. So you're also a liar and hypocrite. Eff off with your fake concern about people. All you care about is that it makes it easier to virtue signal. when some mental health case hurts someone.

But all you do is prove how stupid you are so.. oh wait, i see your point now.

Ahhh yes - your facebook degree I forgot CBC probably taught you that's what other people are like. It's not true. Sorry kiddo.

Well no, they're not. Sandy hook - gun was stolen from mother. Columbine - guns were stolen from family. Killings at the border - guns were given to them by american gov't under fast and furious. Sometimes they're bought legally but - so was the truck that killed 80 plus people in france. So was the truck full of fertilizer that the unibomber used. Pretty sure the airplanes that crashed into the world trade centers were lawfully owned and licensed. Knives kill more people than rifles specificaly are reported to, all legally owned. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/ So what's your point? We don't go Ummm - most states do require a background eheck even if you're not a licensed gun dealer. Especially for handguns. https://www.findlaw.com/consumer/consumer-transactions/private-gun-sale-laws-by-state.html So you lied. And here we go again. The left HAS to LIE to try to make it's point becuase otherwise it doesn't have a point. You care more about lying that you do about people. Sorry - that's still you. That's why democrats aren't pushing to have more background checks, they're pushing to ban guns. You don't care if people are killed or not - or if people have background checks or anything else. You ONLY care about banning guns. And more importantly PRETENDING that's the most important thing. I mean if you're so seriousa bout it why didn't biden already reinstate the assault rifle ban? Ohhhh yeaaahhh - then you'd have to admit it makes no difference

As with most terms, the left and certain social justice warriors just use 'colonial' to mean 'people and things i don't like (but actually wouldn't give up). If you look at any political circumstance over time there's pros and cons. THe first nations practiced slavery. THey sold their women as chattel. They frequently wiped out OTHER first nations with whom they feuded. Soooo - how was that better than being a colony? Or may be it was better. The point is, any system of governance has pro's and cons. Calling things "colonial" is just a way of pretending that anything that's gone wrong with governance in the last few hundred years isn't their fault too.