CdnFox

Really, So you just jumped into a conversation you didn't read, Ok - can you at least agree that anti jew slurs coupled with slurs against isreal are unacceptable? Sure. I stand up to you and regularly kick your ass and point out when you're completely full of shit. He does not. You'd think that at the end of the day right or left that Jew Bashing would be universally shunned. But it seems like the left just has a bit of a hate on for jews these days and honestly i can't figure out why. But - you do you. You're a hyocorite and dishonest in the extreme. He's a drunk jew hater, You make a lovely couple.

Side note - my mom has made it VERY clear that if she's ever mentally damaged or in a coma - or if she ever comes to us and says 'it's time' that we are to do what we need to in order help her obain such relief medically without putting up resistance other than a few 'are you sure's'. In short, to help her die when she wants to, and i absolutely would do that without a seconds hesitation if and when the time comes. In fairness some days she makes that decision easier than others But still - i would do it and tho it may break my hard to see her go i'd consider it an act of love in the circumstances. I'd want the same for me in similar situations.

well some argue it that way too. The thing is media stations who were prepared to talk about the story were threatened (and in one case banned) from twitter and facebook etc. With the threat it would be permanent. So - it wasn't JUST they didn't report, there was active efforts to repress it as well. A lot of people get their news from facebook and twitter etc. There were even threats that if they published stories about it on their own platforms and newspaper sites they would be kicked from twitter or facebook because they were engaged in spreading 'fake news'. which we now know was quite true - it definitely was hunter's notebook. Oh yeah - its a big deal and they're still looking at charges - and the important part is some of the emails implicated joe biden as potentially being "in" on taking money from various nations. So there's little doubt it had POTENTIAL to affect the election meaningfully. Whether or not it would have made a difference to the actual end result can't be said of course but you can see why some consider it 'cheating'. I get that. It's not a completely unreasonable position - but at the same time it's not NOT cheating. Its definitely a deliberate attempt to interfere with the election by not just refusing to publish a story - which honestly i consider to be pretty damn bad in an election - but to actively force others not to as well. Using your definition i'm not sure you could say it was cheating by that def ... but you sure as hell can't blame those who define it a little more loosely as feeling like it was cheating. well - not quite true. Lets remember - some of pretty much all of that happens every election in the states, and they did indeed find some this time. It would have been mildly surprising if they didn't. however - the number of instances they found could not possibly have affected the outcome, so while there was fraud it didn't impact the outcome. There's always some fraud or glitches.

LOL - i had a girl yelling at me for being a hunter and abusing animals when I should just be a vegetarian. She was wearing a leather jacket and shoes at the time I don't have the recording any more but we did have it on tape for a while and it got big laughs every time

That's right uncle ben worse - she can't call you a nazi. Yes - and when she gets like that she memes An honest person of colour who needs no one to be professionally offended on their behalf. Well .... we can't have that.

It's known as 'sealioning' - bleating and demanding links with the intention of running the other person around and then discrediting the info. One tactic is as you describe - "Oh THAT isn't an impartial source!!". The next is to use one oft heir many favorite buzzwords. such as "you're moving the goalposts" or "but that was a different time/stiuation/place that is not a precisely perfect copy of what i was describing" or "What they REALLY meant was..." or the old reliable "that's not a definitive answer, that still leaves room for doubt" etc etc etc. They will demand a level of precision that's almost impossible to reach from a source that they can't find the slightest fault with describing a PERFECT match - and if they get it, they just deflect to the next topic without even acknowledging it - and then will say the same lie the next week.

Deficits are neither good nor bad in and of themselves. It all depends on the context. Obviously in a general sense deficits are to be avoided but there are definitely times when they're a good idea, and times when they're a horrid idea.

well... depends how you define 'relevant' i guess, but i think by most reasonable definitions.. no

Probably not. We'll see if he even wins this seat - he'll have to win it again during the next election too and i'm not sure even if he takes it this time that he'd be able to then

Yeah, well if such a thing were to happen i suspect they'd be targeting the soft 'mushy middle' that tends to decide most elections. But - i just don't see it.

The knowledge of history that kids come out of school with is beyond inadequate. basically they're aware there was history at some point but that's about it. Not only is it limited, but obviously that is the most likely place to see ... ahh.. "Creative editing" of history .

Ok, well then my counter position is no There's the door Well kind of what my point was. There are other programs and many of them. Just about everybody wouldn't, Learn to cook dude, it's not hard In canada with possibly the exception of the last 6 months or so if kids are going to school hungry they have negligent parents. Or they're on a diet. The malnutrition rate in canada is a fraction of what it is in the states, with the programs we have there is no way kids go hungry otherwise. I'll dial it back to %99.00 they couldn't afford hot water? C'mon. That severely stretches credibility. I do get it - i've been poor to the point where i've missed meals. Sometimes it can get that bad. But i also didn't take advantage of gov't programs that i could have, and would have if i'd had kids at that point.

It's been defined on this board a dozen times. "What you REALLY mean is.... "

Dude- the guy is not sane. If you try to engage him with logic then not only will he not believe you but he'll wind up getting drunk and then deciding out of the blue you're his enemy and his Customer (lolol!) and follow you around making an ass of himself. You're not likely to convince a jew hater they're wrong. It's a real left wing thing right now and the more he talks the more it's obvious he's left wing.

Nobody goes to your website. They barely pay attention to you here You're a liar and a jew hating jack booted thug - why would anyone go to your webpage?

ROFLMAO - you know she's upset when she starts with the memes @Perspektiv, looks like your story emotionally broke AmAntifa again The left hates it when their 'professionally offended' hypocrisy is discussed. Of course i'm a white male so i'm usually on the other end - being 'chick-splained' why anything i do is terrible and makes me a terrible person and a nazi and slave owner (I'm canadian for effs sake, we never allowed slavery. Still my fault somehow.). These people are not happy unless they're miserable, and they need everyone else to be miserable as well. Its like the old saying, happy is happy on it's own but misery demands company

I think the theory would be the other way around - ndp supporters setting the fires to embaras the UCP for their forest fire budget cuts. And Smith is taking heat over that right now (pardon the pun) But i just can't see it. I'm not a big fan of the ndp but lets get real. Burning forests and towns to win a few votes? Not bloody likely. Who knows what it's about - could just boil down to something as simple as 'crazy person'. Hopefully they'll catch someone and we'll see.

As near as i can tell Bernier is desperately hoping that the next election results will be him winning a seat and the ndp, libs and bloc perfectly tied with the CPC after the speaker is chosen, thus making him the defacto prime minister

Ok - that was funny. History disappears all the time. People think 'everyone knows this' and then it's forgotten. History is also rewritten as well and yes that is a real threat as you say. But really that's just the same thing.

Yes - that way it gives you more of an excuse to drink!!!

so you live in burns lake Oh look - a hard core leftie who thinks we shouldn't be upset about history disappearing. How shockingly surprising. Yawn.

Exactly. Hopscotching his way across the country desperately looking for someone who'll be nice to him and complaining about his opponent relentlessly while nobody cares. Kind of reminds me of Contrarian, but that's a different story ':) LOL! TO be honest especially early on his best chances were a sask or alberta riding, especially alberta. And he should have transferred his flag there early and run in one of those ridings last election, There's a modest chance he would have won. Now it would be hard to not look opportunistic

ROFLMAO - SO you ADMIT nobody likes you

That post you quoted wasn't meant to be addressed to you, it was to contrarian. I've never seen you attack isreal

Ahhh - just waiting to sober up are you? What kind of loser posts a post that says i'll post a post replying to your post when i have time to post YOU just posted a big post LOL - you're nothing if not entertaining