CdnFox

So you're conceding that you lied and you'd like to move on. Fair enough, just don't do it anymore. And yet we listen to you. WE're just that nice. So Nationalist was being entirely fair then when he asked where the investigation was. IF you have no answer then fine. But what we DO know is that as of right now there is no known investigation. No, we would assume they did over 4 billion dollars in damages and took over gov't buildings while calling for the downfall of the gov't. That's basically what all those riots you mentioned ended in, and you seemed to feel they were behind that so if we're going to "assume" something, that would be it. Frankly to me that sounds worse but whatever. In short you have no answers for it, you know you're wrong and resort to lies and insults to cover your ass as always. You're pathetic - but at least you're consistently so. Consistency is important in this day and age.

(emphasis by me) This is my big problem. I mean, there's lots of corrupt charities and special interests out there. PETA is horrible as an example. But - these guys are doing REAL harm and promoting racism rather than fighting it. And they're spreading violence and real damages. They go beyond corruption.

Above. Jeez dude if you don't read your own posts how can you expect us to? Ohhh look - he's losing the argument so once again he's changing the topic. The question was - was blm investigated and were people charged as a result. And you know the answer and you lied about it so now you're trying to change the subject to one you think you can win. The answer is they weren't. Protesters were, and it's possible some were BLM supporters (it doesn't mention - it doesn't even mention how many were counter protesters), but BLM was not. Fact is - i DO believe BLM had something to do with organizing a lot of riots, if not these ones in particular then others. And i think as @Nationalist said, they should have been investigated and prosecuted. But they weren't. Were they. AAAAANND lying again to cover your own failings. "projection deflection and 'get back here with those goalposts" are all key words for the left that mean "Oh shit, he's right but i can't just admit that" When i have i ever denied the election? Oh that's right - you're trying to change the channel again. Can't discuss the original point because you know you've already got caught lying about it. Pathetic. Try being truthful next time. It'll serve you better .

i assume you're talking to your mirror I observe that it didn't evolve for thousands of years and showed no signs that it was going to. THere's no guarantee the sun will rise in the east tomorrow, but given it's track record it's a pretty safe bet. Do you have any actual evidence that after thousands of years they were going to? No? well there you go. well first off i don't know who "Your" culture is but mine sure as hell didn't. But if you're referring to the british they sure as hell didn't own or trade women like cattle. Can't remember if they had slaves that far back but i doubt it was prevalent. But the first nations sure did and there's no reason in the world to think they wouldn't have continued to do so. But - we came along and said 'nope'. You don't get one without the other. So no colonization, no exposure. Nobody was just going to take a walk into the heart of a country this big and look around. It's coloured by facts if that's what you mean. It's not hard to verify either. For probably over 10,000 years first nations culture and technology didn't change all that much. The tools and such that we find that are ancient are about the same as what we find that's only just precontact. We came along and they got metal, they got horses, they got medicine, they stopped trading their women (eventualy), they stopped making war on each other (ish.) they got guns for hunting, they got blankets to keep them warm, their babies started to survive more, their life average went from in their 20's to in their 30's and shot up. So regardless of any fantasies you might have that somehow they might have done that after 10,000 years of not doing it, the fact is that europeans DID do it. And they benefit from that to this very day. Sorry if the truth and facts are too 'colonial' for you.

So you admit you were lying and weren't talking about BLM before. None of which had anything to do with BLM apparently. You can see what he's doing here @Nationalist He knows he lost the point, and he's angry it was discovered he "bent the truth" in his reply where he made fun of you, and now he's going to try to change the argument from your point to "does BLM actually mean BLM or does it mean just people who riot". BLM was not investigated for this, no blm people were arrested as a result of such an investigation. But they should have been. Even if the people arrested weren't blm, for those demonstrations that turned into riots that BLM organized directly they should be held to account. Moonbox just doesn't want to talk about that. Doesn't fit the leftie propaganda points.

Prove it you lying sack of shit. Prove that all those people were directly connected with black lives matter. You can't - because you were lying and you know it. But typical of you to double down. Because you hoped people wouldn't check it and if they did you hoped you could gaslight them into thinking that this were all BLM arrests Which you can't. Once again you've been exposed as a liar. Yawn. Try telling the truth next time. Just to mix it up.

No, that's a pretty stand up accusation. Dog whistles are something else. A dog whistle is when you say one thing but mean something else. He really is calling you a race hustling cultist.

So you're back to just out and out lying. BLM or Black Lives Matter isn't even mentioned once in that whole link. It doesn't even say they are blm protests that these people were attending. So this has nothing to do with blm. You just made that up. I don't know why i bother giving you the benefit of the doubt. So you're unaware of any investigation of BLM for their roles in any of this and NOBODY has been charged as a result. @Nationalist was right and you were not being an honest poster. How's your twitter feed doing.

So you're going to ignore what he said. Well - that's what we've come to expect from liberal scum.

Is this like where you asked for ONE democrat asking for reparations and then when we gave you one you ran off and hid in a corner and cried? Because that's getting kind of boring. Are you at this point claiming that there AREN'T any? or are you just sealioning because you know you're wrong but can't cope with that.

Really? He was pretty specific that he was looking for investigations into BLM. ANd who got prosecuted as a result. I haven't heard of any and i didn't see any with a quick search - could you post that link you were using that shows that?

Dodge Dodge Dodge. Dodge Dodge. Every single answer dodges the issue raised but instead tries to throw it back on the other person as being their fault or their misunderstanding. I do not understand why the left cannot just debate and discuss things honestly.

Go ahead. Sticking your head in the sand seems to be your thing.

Well he's certainly free to go donate to any black person he likes. The thing is - part of the liberal mind set is that we must spend money to right the wrongs of the past and the inequities of the present, but the OTHER part of the liberal mindset is that we must do this with OTHER people's money.

There was nothing quesitonable about the 2016 election, but that didn't stop the dems trying to fake evidence against trump before hand and spend the next 4 years claiming his presidency was illegitimate. Funny that, isn't it

Not really a problem but - the difference of course is that those people all assimilated and their kids went on to have happy healthy lives and participated in building a better canada. Just like the jews from the concentration camps who survived tended to go on and have good lives, and their kids thrived. For SOME reason the first nations doesn't quite seem strong enough to do that yet. But that doesn't change the fact that they were HARDLY the only group to go through that. LOL - sure you have kiddo Here's a gold star

What accumulated wealth? Even after slavery lots of blacks lived "paycheque to paycheque" so to speak and never accumulated any. Also - without slavery those decendents would be living in africa. Go see how 'rich' people are over there. And this is why we don't give reparations to the decedents of people. I mean - it's not too late to give me a million dollars for putting up with your drivel, but most people would argue that isn't a moral issue

Not our fault - when some one says something stupid it's you so much of the time that it's easy to make that slip LOL!

LOL - it's what you said little guy I can see why you'd try to backpeddal tho - it's a little embarrassing for you What you said was a joke - he's joking in return. What's the problem? the only difference is he KNOWS what he's saying is a joke

Absolutely. There's an old saying, i forget the author - "I don't want to be the leader, i want to control the selection process". The CBC is the one that really tips the scales, because as a state broadcaster it's SUPPOSED to be neutral and people tend to take it that way. There's a lot of people for whom it's the only real media source they consume regularly. Then you get the gov't itself, working hard to control the information getting out there. Now - most gov'ts do that but an aggressive media and effective opposition tend to counter balance that. But - most of the media goes very light on the gov't and doesn't ask the tough questions or dig into scandals. And they underreport on negative stories for the gov't. and overreport on negative stories for the party they don't like. The more you control the flow of information the more you control the outcome.

Well if they used gasoline to do it they're total hypocrites

Would that be trump V2? Seems like he's on track to win another term Frankly the late night talk show hosts and comedians are desperately hoping that's how it works out. Four more golden years of shows writing themselves What was he convicted of as president again? And what criminal fraud charges has he been convicted of as president? No, it's just funny.

First off - points for resurrecting "dingaling" as an insult Next - loving the salty 'faux outrage" Your salty tears always bring a smile But oh - you're deeply concerned about his life! For sure! So worried! Buddy - the internet stays on all day where most of us live. And computers are everywhere. Half my posts come from my phone as i'm walking around doing something and i just use voice dictation. You get an alert, you look at your phone, you say a few sentances, you don't even need to stop walking. Yeash. Tell me you're bitter about getting called out by the guy without telling me.

I see you're still struggling with those reading comprehension skills this morning

No, i suspect if we're looking for root causes that your mother may have had a slight substance abuse problem during pregnancy But more immediately you're obviously getting frustrated that you're getting beat up so much and you're realizing that you really are more of a comic-relief mascot around here and not taken seriously And obviously some days that gets to you more than others. The memeing always gives it away. DEFLECTION!!!!! LOL! If it eases your frustration at all, i genuinely am amused at the majority of your posts and it really does make me smile. I almost choked on my tea at @WestCanMan tellilng you to take your victory lap but try not to loot any stores And I do appreciate the humour you're bringing whether intentional or not. So honestly thanks for that, And try not to let any of this get to you - it's just the internet in the end.