CdnFox

ROFLMAO - tell me you're an !diot who just realized he's a retard without telling me Another first class logical argument from the left So is the city of burnaby 'so far behind it's scary' for spending this money then? Hmmm That would be left wing asses that are demanding this cash Conservatives were fine with the way it was And i'd point out that if you think i'ts fine for women to go to the washroom with men peeing in urinals, then the trans should have had no problem continuing to use those bathrooms without modification LOL - Gotcha You're too dumb for this

Are high schools run by starbucks now? Did you read the article? Ohhhh i forgot - your reading comprehension problem LOL You probably didn't make it to highschool so you don't realize what it's like

It really doesn't. But if lying about it helps you then i guess that's what you're going to do. But you go ahead and tell burnaby they're wasting their money and they should just be making the boys pee in front of the girls and they need to get out of their dank basements LOL - i'm good with saving the money

Is that the program where you're so petrified of discussing the issue you've got to use tacky phrases like 'get with the program'? So girls walking by a row of guys peeing in urinals is fine. So - as i noted before your big plan is public urination. Says the guy who's absolutely scared spitless of discussing the issue They didn't take the sign off the door did they. They spent 100's of thousands of dollars. So - are you now saying that they're wrong and the city should immediately put a stop to this and save the money?

don't have to have a liberal party to have liberals. And the left pretty much is communist these days. Right tovarish?

Still can't bring yourself to discuss the issue. Well - toilet humour is about all we can expect from the left these days. And the same people will complain that violence against gays and trans is going up. Well - it's what you want i guess.

The lie that the school bathrooms either before or after are anything like your ones at home. Or that it's about their function. Again - you have no answer for the actual issue so you just lie.

How would that work - so women just walk into a bathroom with guys peeing into uranals? So - your solution is public urination?

Sure - because it's the conservatives who demanded this Again - the left has to lie to make it's point. Well at least you're consistent.

Depends. IF the restaurant had to pay 100,000 dollars to renovate it that way then your meal would probably be more But it's very telling of the lefties here that they're pretending that the problem is the style of washroom rather than the cost and other issues. Once again the left has to lie in order to make or avoid the point - they can't just address it head on. I don't know why i'd expect different. Sure - hand over your credit card and i'm sure they'll be quite willing It's fine for new builds, but the costs of remodelling bathrooms such as this which exist is very high. But you knew that was the point. Just couldn't be honest enough to deal with it I guess. Well - that's the left for you.

The bathroom in their house probably didn't cost millions of taxpayer dollars

FIFY.

sounds reasonable. I'm sure there's a way. but i think that's what we're missing - a model and profiling combo that gives us an 'ideal' range and hard cap.

Well some of it is pretty empirical . X number of people will need Y amount of housing and Z amount of infrastructure, and those should be easy numbers. Create a cap using those. The rest you could probably address with advances to our flag system. That would make changes based on needs pretty easy.

Well it's true the dems to love themselves a good culture war. It's been that way for a few hundred years now. Once you divide people it's easy to promote fear and anger. And fear and anger is how snake oil peddlers sell their goods.

Honestly i've heard this for 6 years now. Wake me when he's in prison. Yawn! I'd put money on him winning the presidency again before i put money on prison.

A better question would be 'what's the right model for setting immigration limits in Canada'. I think that's what we need to work out. A formula that gives us a number based on several factors including how many homes are we building? How much infrastructure (Schools, hospitals etc ) are being built? And then factors like what's the job situation. We can't keep bringing in more than we can support with housing and services. If you want more immigration you have to start building more homes BEFORE you bring them in.

https://www.burnabynow.com/local-news/shared-all-gender-washrooms-the-future-for-burnaby-schools-school-district-7096340 So - this design obviously solves a problem. It's going to cost a lot of money but it'll end a debate. The question becomes Are we Done? We're going to spend hundreds of millions doing this across the land if it works out. We've already passed a bunch of laws. So much has been done to accomodate a TINY part of the population. Are we done yet? Or will they keep coming back demanding more money, more recogniztion, more special benefits and more reduced rights for the rest of us? Can we finally call it quits when we get this done? How many hundreds of millions more will it take?

A jeep cheroke has more native ancestry in it than lizzy has.

I don't believe the offensive has started yet. Sounds like at this point they're cutting supply lines and conducting some very limited actions in places like bakmuth to pin troops and draw resources.

I actually had to look up chicken fried steak. Sounds like schnitzel.

But not prime minister. Who is responsible for residential schools. My bad - i had it in my head he was part of that liberal-conservative coalition that was going on for a while but you're right, he's just a straight up liberal.

The liberal party still exist. Does the PC party? Nope https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-apologizes-for-swearing-at-kent-1.995992 Nope -you're still the liar And here's the thing - you liberals always double down on lies. You lie, you get caught, you get proven wrong, and then you double down on it. Like i said to start with - you'll just pretend i didn't Libearls lie and you're a liberal thanks for proving my point.

Total proof, and never denied by trudeau Sorry little guy - It was you who was the liar. And about all the other ones too which i notice you couldn't dispute And this is why everyone calls liberals liars. You whine and complain "Oh - why do you keep calling me a liar?" Its simple. You always lie ? Try telling the truth. And you still owe me nine. Unless you've realized how stupid that made you look. C"mon - i'll promise to make fun of you each time agian - you know you love that Well in fairness to tommy tho (who was a notorious racists actually) he wasn't in power. It wasn't his job to address that, so while i disapprove of what he did he kind of gets a bit of a walk. If he'd been PM then different story.

Clark? Joe clark won a minority gov't and then was defeated in an election forced by trudeau a few months later. That was no victory. He failed horribly. Petro-canada became massive. AND - clarke didn't want to privatize it, he wanted it dismantled. Fail. The guy wasn't even in power for a year as i recall. That's why he's now known as 'Joe Who?'. that's not a 'victory' we want to repeat.