CdnFox

Well why didn't you lead with something like that instead of looking like an !diot with what you posted before? So there's no statute for that NOW - but there was then and it still counts. Well that makes more sense. Although that's a really odd thing to grandfather.

Here's a little clue in life - whenever you use the phrase "so you're saying' in life to rewrite what someone said (in a serious conversation and not as a joke) then you're signalling to the whole world you know you're wrong. it's what losers do. And i doubt he was. Truth be told i don't think he expected to get elected. And i think after he was some people pulled him aside and said 'that's not a thing you want to do' and he decided against pursuing it. At the time he said basically 'she's suffered enough' or 'been through enough' - which makes no sense. It's not even the kind of lie he'd come up with.

THAT OPINION IS USELESS without PROOOOOOOOFFFF!!!

An inquiry satisfies everyone. Strange that you're so opposed to an obvious solution that's to everyone's liking other than the liberal party.

The article you posted says they're almost the same thing and the debate rages over whether there is any difference and what the differences might be. LOL - i love it when you make posts that prove me right And no, hitler was a socalist.

Yes - everyone knew you'd lie about it ages ago. That's the point. More accurately you don't know many who'd want to admit it publicly.

It wouldn't unfortunately. Remember when the kids were all excited for interest rate hikes thinking that would bring prices down? And that lasted for 5 seconds before they went up again but now it's harder to buy a home due to the higher rates? At the end of the day there are not enough homes. So the market isn't capable of crashing. There's no 'bubble' because the supply is so short - and about to get shorter. If people sold their rental properties it would either go to people who wanted to live in it (which means less supply in rental and higher prices) or to someone willing to take the risk of being a landlord so someone who's going to keep the rents high, and probably a larger rental company instead of the smaller one or two unit landlords that mostly make up teh market today. rental prices will be going up no matter what unless more product is built at a faster rate than population growth for a sustained period - but if landlords leave the market the situation will become hopeless for many renters at the bottom end. No home to rent at any kind of afffordable rate and too poor to buy a home. They'll be street-camping in an rv if they're lucky. Sucks for people with kids.

The guy needed to go man. Even if you think he was pure as the driven snow as a person his job is not only to investigate but to give people confidence that the issue has been fairly investigated and with his background that just wasn't going to happen. Ties to china and ties to trudeau.

There's no statute of limitations - there would have been criminal charges now if there was sufficient evidence. So while the others may have been convincing enough for a civil trial where the burden will be clear and convincing or balance of probabilities, obviously it didn't raise to the level of reasonable doubt. Which doesn't mean it didn't happen - but we can't say he was convicted of sexual abuse, that's for sure.

In what way would it come out? As you say you aren't able to check if CRT or elements of it are being taught under different names. That sounds a lot like you're choosing to believe it doesn't happen and are simply reacting out of frustration rather than any actual data. I see online relatively credible sounding evidence that it is taught or that elements of it are in most parts of the US. Including your area. I think the best you can say is you don't know. Anything else is just another kind of paranoia at this point.

so - i can see why you didn't feel like answering my question. You lied. He was not convicted of a sex offense. Was he. He lost a civil suit. Whole different thing, Here's a hint in life kid - if you have to lie to make your point... you probably don't have a very good point.

Anything with more than 2 syllables is 'babble' to you.

ROFLMAO - I SAID CRIMINAL CHARGES!!! What you just quoted was CIVIL CASES!!!! LOLOOLL Holy shit kid - you are dumber than a stump We KNOW the statute hadn't run out on civil cases because this WAS A CIVIL CASE. What i said was that there's no statute on cirminal cases - and that's still true ':) LOL If you're going to try to speed google something AT LEAST READ IT! Good god you're SO stupid So - still no evidence LOL - what a hypocrite the left is

THIS OPINION is MEANINGLESS without PROOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooOOF!!!!!!!!!!!! so why didn't they get pardons?

Sorry - are you still having english comprehension problems? Guess i can't be surprised from a guy who manages to quote himself by accident

To be sold to the next rich person who can afford it. With a limit of housing driving prices through the roof a lot of renters today can't afford to buy. So that leaves a severe shortage of rentals and homes are still outside the price range of most people who don't own one already. And with few people buying homes as rentals developers slow down the number of units they start. The end result is - no homes to rent and none coming down the pipe.

Ahhh - so it was his Cronies that were able to outwit the FBI. Gotcha ROFLMAO - sure kiddo But the fbi didn't even find evidence of 'collusion'. And he's not potus now. Here's another thought - he didn't actually commit a crime and you've been fed a load of bullshit claiming he did that's on par with 'they stole the election'. I swear - both sides in this are equally thick sometimes Ahh - so you're fine with no evidence as long as you like the conclusion Your hypocrisy is appreciate LOL!

So then he's not convicted of being a sexual predator at all. He was found to be liable - that isn't the same thing in the slightest. Civil court is no where near the same standard. And i'm sure there was some reason why they couldn't prosecute but it wouldn't be the statute of limitations - there is none on sex crimes for criminal prosecutions. I suspected they were being dishonest when they made that claim. But - you always like to give the benefit of the doubt.

He actually backed down on that promise the day after the election. He didn't try to get a prosecution.

He probably didn't realize that the security clearance on those documents was "corvette level' or higher.

Still waiting. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

Sure they do - every time they try to explain how he's outwitted the fbi, the police, everyone else. Genus! Yet somehow hasn't actually been convicted of a crime. How very odd! What's your explanation for how he constantly breaks the law as you say yet is never convicted? i mean - even al capone got caught in the end.

ROFLMAO - you don't actually say anything That's 31 post of you being too terrified to talk and me laughing at you! And THEN you actually wasted the time to go COUNT THEM so that you could claim that YOU"RE not the obsessed one!! AAAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA !!!!!!!!!!! Whew - just when i think you can't get dumber LOL - tell me you're utterly obsessed without telling me I mean seriously - who wastes the time to go back and count like that?

IF we put it up - you'll claim we got it wrong and then demand to know why we're making such a big deal of it.

You're doing an awful lot of dancing here. This isn't like we're talking about the chances of being a boltzmann brain or the like. There's been claims - there is in fact not just a theoretical possibility but a probability and you stated that you were sure it wasn't being taught and subsequently have had to admit you don't know, and you're now trying to downplay the chances of it. What's the deal? I know it's taught in Canadian schools because they do come out and say so and it seems entirely reasonable to believe that elements of it have made it into US schools - what's making you so eager to say it's not when it's not clear? That's already been shown to be wrong. But thanks for coming out and representing the radical left for us today