CdnFox

Because you were voting liberal anyway

Those words don't really mean anything to you. You're saying that because you think it's hard for people to argue with things being fair without defining what fair actually means. Same with justice Sure. They probably refuse to investigate cases of tax fraud as well. That is not the body that investigates police shootings. The group that does that would be the FBI. Guess who's investigating? The FBI. This isn't a case of excessive force. Either he was justified in firing the shot or he wasn't and the group that investigates that is the FBI You just blew your own argument out of the water. This guy's controlled by trump then he is exactly who they would want doing the investigation. If what you're saying is true this guy would be the first guy trump would send in and make sure that the report favored him and what he wanted There are tons of protections for civil rights in America. It is not a civil right to run over police officers with your car

We know. If we do you'll just demand the liberals freeze our accounts LOL

because you extend the definition of 'civil rights' to mean 'criminals should be allowed in whenever they want'. Which is deeply disturbing, Your version of 'civil rights' is that there must be no law and order. Except in severe cases like if someone assumes a pronoun.

We already know that. There's no need to state the obvious Kid, we're all about 5 steps ahead of you here You're so far behind you THINK you're in front, but in reality we lapped you

Being able to run over a cop is not a basic human right.

But was prepared to bulid one and invested hundreds of millions in it before the liberals passed laws cancelling it. So there are absolutely oil pipeline companies that go to the west coast. Just no pipelines. Because the liberals shut it down. And are still doing so. Further your question was: Embridge absolutely has pipelines servicing the west coast, They just don't supply it to a port. You did NOT specify oil pipelines until AFTER you realized you're wrong And they're not the only ones operating pipelines that go to the coast. But embridge is the one that has actually said previously they would build an oil pipeline Sigh, no matter how stupid you are or how wrong you are, we can always count on you to double down and find a way to be MOAR stupid.

well your imagination is pretty limited i'm sure, what with your mental health problems and all

More 'university of facebook' stuff from you i see

Now most of the time you run away crying like a baby because I show you facts that you can't dispute And here's a hint kiddo, but your moral support section is Robo Smith, you're probably dealing with the wrong side of the argument But you hate accountability. I've suggested many times that the public should hold governments accountable for their actions and choices and you say that's a terrible idea.

Like what. Which country are we now doing more trade with than we were? What new trade deals has he actually brought home? Investment is fleeing the country at record rates, where's all this investment? He hasn't made any strides That's only true if he signed new deals. Which new deals has he signed? Then show me the real activity. What deal has he signed? What trade has increased? Where is this investment money? If what you were saying was true there would be tangible things you could throw in my face and say here's a trade deal where we are now going to make more money trading blah blah blah to these people. We have absolutely nothing in the way of new trade deals and there's no new investment. Where's this magical hidden benefit?

I don't really think that's why he does it. And it's not likely to produce anything. And in fact it hasn't produced anything despite the fact he's been doing that for almost a year. Investment in Canada is still at an all-time low and in fact we're bleeding investment money at this time. The Venezuela situation isn't going to make it any better, nobody was interested in building a pipeline before with the regulations in place and they sure as hell aren't going to be now. Nor have we got any new trade deals. That's like saying tennis equals golf. It's just not true. On a very high level they're both econmic topics but they have no relation to each other directly. We can attract investment without increasing trade, and for the most part we can increase trade without additional investment Which would be an exercise in semantics but for the fact that they require completely different actions and efforts to secure and promote. Nonsense. If he'd dropped the tanker ban and anti pipeline bill the moment he got in we'd be looking at getting our first proposals right now. Instead investment went elsewhere If he'd cut spending and business tax and signaled that canada was open for business he'd have stopped capital fleeing the country. At his current rate of success we will still be severely underperforming economically and sinking in world standing 3 years from now. Not only are things not getting better, they're getting worse. Generally speaking governments attract investment by making changes to regulation and taxation that make it worthwhile for businesses to come and spend money. And that isn't happening at all You can sometimes create trade opportunity with high level government to government discussions but the reality is the work is actually done behind the scenes by bureaucrats and Business Leaders. Not by flying around and spending taxpayer money on lavish dinners generally speaking Harper did more trade deals than any prime minister in living memory and he did the vast majority of them without leaving Canada. He did go on a few international trips but for the most part they were to create hype in those countries for deals that had already been negotiated. If what he's doing worked, by this point we'd be seeing results and we're just not

There's not much indication that that's what he's actually doing. He's been doing that for almost a year now and he has brought home no new investment, no new trade deals, nothing of any value. To be honest if feels more like he's promoting his own personal brand to other countries rather than bringing home any benefits for Canadians

Foreign investment is not trade. It's investment. Trade is something different. As a country we need to definitely attract far more investment and we also need to expand our trade opportunities but they are two very very different things

Robo, you're such an ultracrepidarian (am taking bets on how long it takes before he uses that himself incorrectly )

No she didn't, and she drove her car into a police officer. She hit him.

LOLOL another gem from the highly educated robosmith

Followed by attempting to run him over with a car LOLOL Well at least he knew the murder attempt wasn't personal.....

But they don't of course, and that's what upsets you. That's why you get all pissy and why you feel the need to lie. I can tell the truth all day long and my story stays the same. You should try it

Act that you hate democracy is never going to be a shock to me. You made it quite clear that you think the liberals should just be in power forever and should never be challenged and anything they do wrong is a result of previous governments. That never changes

They're not disputing and they're just lying. I can show you the video I can point out the angles I can clearly see that she accelerated towards him there's the fact that she actually hit him and everybody agrees that these are facts. But there are some on the left who will simply say "Nu huh" without offering anything as if that's a 'dispute'. Nope, that's a child sticking its' fingers in it's ears and having a break down rather than face a truth it doesn't like. The video is clear, this is what happened. Period. You'll notice every single person who says she wasn't driving at him avoids answering the question 'then how did he get hit".

Is that what you refer to the voices in your head as No it's not the voice of experience it's the voice of wussing out Don't make the mistake of thinking I don't

Right, they're not there for illegal aliens or anything If you guys didn't have bad logic you'd have no logic at all

Sure you are. Which is why you're reduced to posting silly little pictures and lying like crazy about what you said and what I said and looking like a tard. And this is what happens every time. The facts don't fit your fiction so you just try and lie your way through and I come along and point out the facts and your left crying and demanding that you are stupidity is somehow my fault

She absolutely struck him, you can see it in the video from his perspective, he went to the hospital and was treated, virtually every party involved including the left and the right agree that the vehicle hit him You're lying your ass off now and it just makes you look stupid. There's no arguing this, she hit him Absolutely no ice officers told her to leave. Only one was talking to her and they told her to get the hell out of the car and to turn it off. Instead she Backed up, brought her car in line with the officer who was to her front and accelerated and struck him. And she got killed which is appropriate It was her wife that told her to 'drive baby drive'. Now the wife is making good money taking interviews. Should have listened to the cops. If you're doing something that is threatening the life and safety of other people including an officer who's armed then you're going to probably get shot, and you might very well die. And yes, you deserve to get shot in that situation. Sorry If that's unacceptable, then your other choice is to listen to police, do what they say, and consider your legal recourse after the fact if you feel they're in the wrong. Unfortunately she chose to drive into a cop. So she got shot and he was absolutely right to do so.