CdnFox

LOL - and there it is folks - full meltdown It's always wonderful to end the day with AA so upset she starts meme'ing at people ROFLMAO - another bad day for her, she had a melt down in the morning and looks from her posts like another one before she goes to bed

I pointed out 13. I notice you chose to ignore that. Typical leftie

But you could. And those who felt you should be allowed to literally presented this very argument - that emancipation would be an infringement on their rights. And they DID have those rights, at the time. So it is actually a pretty good one Somebody said that the rights of others ended where they infringed upon their rights and we correctly realized that the greater harm was to not allow the slaves to go free.' (eventually). It's really no different here. The rights of people don't go away just because trans people feel they have 'rights' that conflict with that. And that's the problem - they have been acting exactly like that. And there's a backlash. New laws are being passed right now to reign in the trans agenda's abuse of children. Companies are discovering it doesn't pay to associate with trans activists. And the gays are getting caught up in that - children are being organized to go protest in the streets and stomp on pride flags. Say what you like - but when you try to simply override other people's rights there's going to be a problem.

Well i don't know about 'most' - but i think for sure even the dedicated trump haters have to be seriously questioning it. Although we have seen a number here defend it. I mean - i don't really count AA , she's not a serious thing and she's more like comic relief around here but other posters have very aggressively tried to defend the position that trump worked with the Russians to win the election inappropriately. I'm a trump "fan" in the same way i'm a blackadder 'fan' - he may not be a very good person but he's frikkin' hilarious to watch and he does have some good ideas from time to time

You bet - it's extra hilarious when you go that mental It sure triggers my laughter!!! LOL (you didn't quite earn three with that one but it was close. Keep going ! )

It was literally in every single left wing publication and for most of them very frequently. It's all the left talked about. Of course the legal term is conspiracy but it was all 'collusion collusion collusion' on the left and how the trump presidency wasn't legitimate. The mueller report is very very very clear - they were looking for 'colllusion' (conspiracy) and they found none. That was their life for 3 years. And further - it was found that investigation not only was flawed but involved illegal activity on the part of the FBI which lead to convictions. AND STILL - even cheating they couldn't find any. And as noted there are STILL DEMOCRATS TO THIS DAY who insist trump was an illegitimate president and the russians got him elected. And you agreed with the whole russian thing again and again and again and again, You can't lie your way out of it now.

They don't. You however have frequently and directly claimed all jews are nazis. Does your hatred of jews show that racism and theocracy are part of the left wing ideology?

Wow - thats a special level of stupid sounds like someone crashed your little brain at some point today! Was it me? I bet it was me

1 https://washingtonstand.com/commentary/at-least-13-us-hospitals-perform-gender-transition-surgeries-on-minors That also covers 2 And as noted - there are more than likely more but the media isn't really looking. And from canada https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/trans-kids-treatment-can-start-younger-new-guidelines-say-1.5947894 As we know - the us and canada tend to follow each other. and why is this a little scary? well: https://nypost.com/2022/06/18/detransitioned-teens-explain-why-they-regret-changing-genders/ https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-data/ https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canada-transgender-treatment So ... we about done pretending it's a thing that doesn't exist?

Setting aside the fact i never claimed that (shame on you) the fact is that was the case indeed. Gays were protected by law, they had weddings all the time, there was very little anti gay violence, if you were gay you were far more likely to be attacked BY a gay than BECAUSE you were gay - workplaces hired gays without a blink. I'm sure there were pockets here and there but generally nobody gave a crap if people were gay, and the issue was long since put to bed. Nope, not in any meaningful amounts. sorry . How many organized protests where children are jumping up and down on the pride flag were there in 2005? 2010? 2015? There are now. OH you mean like if i owned you as a slave and you wanted your freedom, it would be infringing on my rights to own slaves so you can't. Sorry kiddo - that doesn't fly. You can't just claim 'infringement' whenever you like. If you try to steal people's rights - there is usualy a blowback As to the rest - drivel not worth going point by point on. Conservatives didn't lose. They agreed. Just like the liberals had to in the end even tho they actually went to the courts to see what they could do short of gay marriage. And it was based on the idea that 'we should let other people live their lives as they wish'. Now - the letter people don't want that. They want to take other people's rights. They want to attack them personally and try to claim they're bad people if they have ANY concerns about taking their children to see men waive their penises at them (as i posted). And people are getting fed up. Ask disney. Ask bud lite. This won't end well.

Anyone who has to rely on trying to clain the source is the problem without refuting the points is admitting defeat. As to the rest - pathetic. Top FBI agent says he wants to charge - your response "oh it's just some guy'. That's the guy in charge of her investigation. So - "one guy" who's job it was. The next one proves the call. The one after you can't even begin to refute. You did ie. And you're doing it again. You should be deeply ashamed. You have the potential to at least have a half way decent mind if you put in the effort, but you're wasting it and all you can muster is elementary school defenses and dodges. Be better. And stop with the lying. The fact, which has been shown, is that the fbi wanted to charge her till comey got a call from the justice department right after Clinton got out of his plane, ran across the tarmac, and got on board anotehr plane to "talk" with the justice. That is verifiable through dozens of sources. If you find yourself resorting to sealioninig - you're on the wrong side of the argument.

And now you look like a re-tard But now apperently you're an INTENTIONAL re-tard Sorry sparky but you're not correct there. They are correct that the section quoted was wrong - but not the Code Which is why i was very careful to ask what YOU meant And you were specific - the code Doesnt' matter. The code is clear - when displayed in a line.... the flags are displayed in a line. The fact that there's another display somewhere else means nothing - can you show me in the code where it says "Unless there's another display near by"? ROFLMAO!!!! - you know what's fun about you? when someone proves you wrong and presents you with facts you always duoble down on the stupid and it is JUST hilarious to watch It doesn't say anything about a line - it says at teh same height Sorry punkin - swing and a miss again HAHAHA _ i actually posed the law for you and you STILL screwed it up Doesn't say it has to be - just that it has to be a flag or a pennant . Is the pride flag a flag? You called it one yourself. Everyone calls it the pride flag. Soooo - flag. YOU DID IT AGAIN!!!! I Posted the actual law for you and you STILL effed up what was in it!!! ROFLMAO!!!! Its' like ONE LINE man, how can you keep screwing this up so badly!?!?! I constantly put facts in front of you and this is constantly how you react I don't know how you manage to be so dumb that much but seriously it is frikkin hilarious

It doesn't always 'evolve' the way you think. For example - libeals in the 70's would be horrified in today's 'liberals' views on free speech. The current repressive nature of the libs and their fondness of authoritarianism would not be considered 'evolution'. But today's libs do, And conservatives didn't "lose". They realized that their opposition wasn't in keeping with their values as conservatives. I know - i was there. Many pointed out correctly that we could hardly call ourselves conservatives while denying other people's right to choice. So the fight died out. Most conservatives realky weren't anti gay - many didn't like having 'marriage' as a term taken away but even then they didn't mind the gays having marriage rights, they just wanted to call it 'civil union'. And even they were told 'drop it' in the end. Oh - reminder, the libs went to the courts looking to see if there was ways they could satisfy the courts instructions to allow gays to marry without calling it marriage. So lets not pretend the liberals were on board with this until they were forced to be by the courts But it's one thing to give people rights - its another to have yours taken. And a whole different 'evolution' may be about to be happening. Keep it up and find out.

People who answer their own questions are so cute :)_ it's like they believe they're thinking or something Lying about what people are concerned about just breeds more concerns. You make things worse. Currently there is a push to expose children to explicit sexual issues at an inappropriate age and people are concerned about that and would be regardless of the sexual orientation of the 'exposes'.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/fbi-officials-wanted-to-charge-hillary-clinton-turns-out-they-should-have/ https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/430881-fbis-top-lawyer-believed-hillary-clinton-should-face-charges-but-was/ https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/20/politics/john-durham-investigation-update/index.html And just because it's fun: https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/06/10/tarlov-flips-out-when-co-host-points-out-dem-indictment-hypocrisy-this-has-nothing-to-do-with-hillary-clinton-1367045/ You lied kiddo. And you knew you were lying. The fbi collected the evidence - the ALL thought she should be charged and were prepared to recommend that and follow through with the charges. And turns out the office that clinton pressured called comey and magicaly he changed his mind And clinton did run across the tarmac. All true. No conspiracy. So here's a question - why do lefties feel the need to lie about easily verified facts so much?

I'm not sure you're using those words correctly - but i'll take a leap of faith. Which part of the 'history' did you disagree with? Well i don't actually do any of those things but i'm free to do all of them. That's what freedom is. If not - then we need to bring in gov'ts who will respect my rights and punish those who would take them. ANd that's what people will work towards. In the end the repressives always fail. And that would be you at the moment. And as we've seen with the protests getting bigger and stronger - i'm right. VERY long before. And they made peace with that and gave it up 20 years ago. Gays got it all - equal rights including marriage, pensions, etc etc. They won completely and good for them. I was actually one of the conservatives fighting for their rights and demanding we drop that crap at the convention. But this isn't about gays any more. This is about MY rights. Like punch a nazi? Which is what the left is doing now? YOU are the one with that blind spot. When their rights were taken away gay people decided to fight back. And they convinced enough people to win their rights. NOW - they're STEALING OTHER PEOPLE"S RIGHTS. And those people are starting to fight back. And guess what's going to happen. That is wrong on many levels. First off - you're talking about conservatism from 100 -200 years ago. LONG ago the conservative movement became more about smaller gov't and people's rights - conserving their freedom. The left USED to be about those things back in the day - keep gov't out of the people's lives and let them make choice. NOW it's about forcing their own ideology by force of law and taking away rights and compelling speech. Nope. before it was fighting for their rights - now it's trying to steal other people's rights. PS i literally posed cases the other day in canada so you're a liar as well as a leftie. But no need to repeat myself i guess. Every bigot and racist has an excuse for their bigtory and racism - and you're no different.

https://calgaryherald.com/news/crime/lethbridge-man-charged-for-sexually-assaulting-trapping-woman Just months after he was granted bail on near-identical allegations, a Lethbridge man is facing multiple charges after a woman was held against her will for four days and repeatedly sexually assaulted. Lethbridge police say they’ve laid new charges against 59-year-old Bernard Alonzo Gibson after receiving a report of an injured woman in the basement of a south Lethbridge home on May 18. The property’s landlord called police after he found the victim, and EMS took the 30-year-old to hospital with extensive injuries. For those who thought that the whole ' crimes while on bail' thing had quieted down, it's still going on all the time. This woman has been badly physically abused (still in hospital). She will never be the same, no matter if her wounds heal or not. And it didn't need to happen.

Yeah - at least the chargers are straight up this time. Not like that new york mess which was considered a bit of a joke by many. That was very much a witch hunt

If one defines themselves as the center of the universe and believes all realities must bend to their observed reality regardless of other observers, then it makes sense. Call it the Heisenberg-antifa certainty principle

There were as far as the fbi were concerned. They were ready to go and all of them felt that it was a perfectly legit charge. Till the call came in. Do you need me to post what you already know to be true? Do you think it makes you look better to try to win on some really sad technicality? We can do that if you like, if you insist on looking like an !diot.

That's the thing - that USED to be the deal, didn't it. You didn't HAVE to approve of a lifestyle - but they did their thing and you did yours and where you had to interact you tried find common ground, not focus on the differences. But NOT NOW. Now it is "UNCANADIAN" if you disagree with children being exposed to kink and nudity at pride parades. It's jail or fines if you don't use someone's preferred pronouns. If you don't want your children to be exposed to kink and sexuality during trans story time, you're a nazi. And - you have to pay for all this. Gay pride parade can't afford it's bills? no problem, the gov't will spend taxpayer dollars to help out. And if you dare say anything about straights or whites then you're just the worst kind of evil. "All lives matter" is a racist comment. "Families matter" is an attack on the letter people. Etc etc. Sorry - for whatever reason they started a culture war and if we're being FORCED to take sides then i guess that's what's going to happen. This is no longer the Canada where we all respect each other. Justin saw to that.

Sigh - this crap sure doesn't help https://tnc.news/2023/06/05/drag-satanic-themed-kids3/ Winnipeg Pride drag queen kids performers posted extreme, satanic-themed content

Nope - just making sure what you're referring to specifically. I thought you MIGHT be referring to just the line mentioned, rather than the code cited which includes many sections. But you cleared it up - you were referring to the code, not the section. Because it does actually violate that code. (c) No other flag or pennant should be placed above or, if on the same level, to the right of the flag of the United States of America, So the section they quoted is wrong - but as you can clearly see there is indeed a flag to the right of the American flag at the same level. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/7 LOL - god you're dumb. You should at least know by now if i'm asking something that seems obvious to you, there's going to be a reason. I thought it was weird too when i read the article so i looked up the actual code. Something you obviously didn't do So yes - it's in violation. Another flag is being displayed at the same level to the right of the US flag. Sounds like the 'paper' just got the section wrong. And now you look like a mooron again. if you weren't so busy calling other people stupid, you might not look so stupid

There is evidence that jobs or tasks that involve children attract Pedophiles in a higher percent. For example there's research that there's no difference between teachers and clergy when it comes to child sex abuse - but both are higher than the average because if your'e a pedophile you're more likely to be attracted to work that has you around kids. Which makes some sense. However - based on that while i don't have specific data regarding drag queens, it is reasonable to assume that like other activites, there will be a higher percent of pedophiles than the general population. Further - a number of groups have released concerning statements about how much kids like kink and sexual issues and should be encouraged to be exposed to it. Which would not be normal behavior for people, most realize exposing kids to sexually explicit material at a young age is extremely inapproproate So you can't say it's irrational. You can argue it's wrong but there is reasonable rationale behind it. Not sure that's the real issue though - i mean, we have research that our kids are at risk from teachers at a higher than average rate as i mentioned and we still let our kids go to school. It seems to me that the majority of the issue with drag queen story time is something else.

well first off many of those immigrants are not eligible to vote. You have to become a citizen first, and studies show that's happening less and less with immigrants choosing to just stay landed immigrant and their kids are citizens Second - historically even of those who are citizens they tend to have a lower than average turn out to vote. Third - many of the 'immigrants' are or were refugees. They tend to vote the way that their sponsors and the people who help them integrate tend to vote and they tend to vote left of center. Fourth - there were 102 candidates. so really it's more about organization and who can get what they need out of the voter pool. ANd that brings us to 5th - name recognition. You'd be stunned at how much people vote because they recognize the name and think they know something about the person. And Chow has that in spades.