CdnFox

But yours WEREN"T merged Which means you deliberately post them separately You're not very bright are you. And i already posted the proof - from TWO major hospitals. So once again you're wrong same as always - but the good news is you're consistent! And a number of people said the recent posts weren't . And why take them down if they're accurate and important to look at motive? Sorry but a card carrying green voter who sells hemp products and advocates for nudity is pretty unlikely to be a conservative.

That's pretty sexist. And aren't you assuming my gender? And aren't you a man? Feels kinda like you didn't think that through very far before posting

It was in that report you posted a ways back. I remember because it's so rare for you to even post a source. But here's one for you https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_alan_i_abramowitz/did_russian_interference_affect_the_2016_election_results oh - turns out i was right. Imagine that. Are you EVER not wrong?

No, just replying to it

Meaning it succeeded. When your reputation for no corruption goes up, thats a good thing And it went up a lot. Well that's just silly of course. It's not like they could wear them 24 7 and easy to give an aide instructions while it's not on There's ways to minimize corruption but the VERY first step is the voters have to be intolerant of it. It wasn't we didn't know justin was corrupt after all. Everyone knew. Its that the voters refused to punish the libs for it. .

Yup. Sorry - all that was disproved. "Someone" with the same "name" put up a bunch of blog posts and the like and it spouted all kinds of right wing stuff, most of which was dated very recently to the attack. And there was some question as to when that stuff was posted. It was taken down a short time later (while he was still in custody) when people began to question it. Turns out it wasn't his. But of course the left still tries to quote that stuff. He was a green party supporter - and a cali green party supporter at that and they're about as radical left as it gets. And that has been verified. HE was a hemp grower and nudits' rights activist who was a long time left wing supporter.

Nope, sorry. Canada's reputation for non corruption went up during the CPC's years and down radically during the libs. The Libs don't remove a minister for illegally using her office for gain. The CPC threw out a minister for ordering orange juice. And the CPC did order planes. they specifically ordered teh ones we'll be buying now. The libs cancelled that and then ordered a competition (which had lots of opportunity for bribes) and then eventually after about a decade... chose the same plane . And now we'll have to wait and see if they actually come through and buy them when the time comes.

Shit - i've scared him into a panicked frenzy! I 'll go shave.. (these lefties, soooo sensitive!)

Well as we know, Pelosi WASN'T attacked on that day But her husband was some time later. Almost killed By a Left Winger.

Well break it down by age if you feel it makes a difference - how may prepubescent mutilations would it take? And how many 18-less-a-day year olds? You can break it down further if you like. How many roughly?

Actually - in Canada there's strong evidence it's not the 'left' - its' the liberals. For whatever reason liberal supporters will tolerate any amount of corruption and pockting of cash as a rule. However - the NDP has a history of trashing the hell out of govt's that show any sign of that. I would point to BC where Harcourt was forced to redign over bingogate which was severely weak tea as far as corruption goes and the ndp voters all but wiped out the ndp after clarke's deck fiasco. The right wing parties have a long tradition for it. The now dead PC party, Alyson redford, etc etc etc. But the libs (actual libs not just parties with that name) are pretty much free to do as they like. Canadians are generally better about it than the us so far - but the libs get away with murder and it's ony a matter of time till the other parties say "why the hell are we bothering to play by the rules then?"

Sorry - didn't mean to scare you...

Funny enough - the research is crystal clear that BOTH sides think the system is rigged and there was cheating when they lose. The dems are no better - 'trump stole the election due to Russian interference' Hillary STILL says he was an illegitimate president and that the election was 'stole' from her. And least we forget the 'hanging chad' incidents of the past and so on Polls have been clear that whichever side loses they feel it was rigged. it's just the american way to be.

Sure - despite leftie claims to the contrary most on the right don't mind gays and acknowledge the things they've done. I know the left likes to lie about that. Remember - bud lite sponsored gay events for decades before their little recent foray into the culture wars and they were the number one beer.

So... were you not being truthful then? Well there's enough that doctors and experts in canada say it's happening too much and too fast. I've posted that information a few times now. And these are experts in that field. Soooo Just out of curiousity - how many mutilations does it take before it's serious enough to be an issue? I'm curious what that number is. It was 1 for me but i could very well be wrong. Tell me how many it would take before you thought it was serious?

And they were SO bent on it... they didn't bring guns or anything. Makes sense.

was replying to you Are you saying you're the flake? That must be the case seeing as you seem bound and determined to keep it going.

Yeah - but it's GOT to take a little more time to get to work having to go around all those huge cracks that will appear in the earth's surface and dodging those giant fiery rocks falling from the sky right? Well he is polerizing , but interestingly its' not like voter turnout radically changed. Up a litle in 2020 but nothing radical. We'd call it low in Canada. So i don't think he gets MORE people into politics all that much - i think he just gets those interested a lot more worked up. People don't vote more, but they vote harder LOLOL Of course there's some exceptions like your brother but the numbers suggest roughly the same percent of people vote as always, with it slightyl higher in 2020 but still below 70 percent.

Because there's so many left wingers here? I see your point... (lol) Joking aside Canadians seem to be poised to finally be sick of justin's and the liberals corruption and give PP a strong mandate along those lines. But honestly the first SNC scandal should have been the end of the libs if we as canadians were serious about stopping corruption. We gave him two more gov'ts and every time there was more corruption. Not just bad policy or the like but actual corruption. What message does that send to politicians.

The conservatives started losing it when the numbers went up and kids started getting mutilated. I mean that's what they started losing it about. So i could see how you'd think the timing was similar. Children are being mutilated and undergoing permanent sterilization and hormone therapy by their parents just to "get up the noses" of right wingers? And you support this? Well.... i admire their dedication to their cause i guess..... The left wing are horrible people.

IT was quite clear from polling and interviews that he won the first time at least strongly in part because people thought he'd be disruptive to the current political machine. The ultimate sabot vote if you will. Sort of like "If you're going to ignore the people and think you can do whatever you want mr political parties - we're going to do THIS to you! (hold my beer). " After 4 years tho the dems had SO polarized things that people started to look at trump like a mighty champion whom the demon lord ... Sorry, i mean the democrats... attacked relentlessly but who could not be slain. So basically now they see it as the first election was Star Wars: a new trump, the second was the democrats strike back, and now they're hoping for return of the don-i

(Shhhhh!! - i was, but i don't want him to know that now.... )

Corruption is very hard to weed out once it's in. There has to be STRONG public support to do so.

Sure. Funding the arts is a little questionable at the best of times, and it can be contentious such as when it spills over into gov'ts spending for sports arenas and such, but there is SOME logic and history in the idea that a gov't is supposed to support and preserve national culture. Just as there's a requirement to provide defense, whether you like the military or not. And there's a requirement for foreign relations and dimplomacy whether you plan to travel or not. But there is no national imperative to support people cross dressing. So spending public funds on it is highly questionable during normal times, but especially right now when tensions are so high regarding the issue. It just breeds more hatred and division and is that really what we need right now.

Aww muffin ... just replying to your post, you didn't think i was talking about YOU did you? Where on earth would you get that idea LOL