CdnFox

And ridicule from everyone else for being a dolt who would use that term when trying to make a point before anyone even says anything insulting to you first. Yeash. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously.

Well i won't respond point by point. I'll just point out there isn't any truth in there and as we've already noted elsewhere it turns out you're the hate filled bigot using nazi methods to spread your views. Pretty disgusting. But - that's the far left foryou

Ahh but they lied about what he said. What he said is: “There can be no middle way in dealing with transgenderism. It is all or nothing. If transgenderism is true, if men can become women, then it’s true for everybody of all ages,” he said. “If it is false, then for the good of society, and especially for the good of the poor people who have fallen prey to this confusion, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely — the whole preposterous ideology.” He in no way called for trans people to be 'eradicated'. See? The left has to lie to make their point.

Fair point. Perhaps that really is the difference. There used to be a saying that men vote on the candidates handshake and women vote on his smile.

Now - i'm all for immigration but I think you can't have more immigration than you have infrastructure to absorb them. You have to have enough homes and schools and medical services etc. It seems like we're bringing in WAY too many people for our current infrastructure expansion. We're building less homes per year than we normally do - we all know our medical systems are starved for cash and the feds aren't doing anything to help. There's no way we can absorb THIS many unless we radically increase infrastructure production. I fear there will be a backlash over this as fights for resources mount.

Dude that's almost identical to the packaging on my fish but yes. Honestly tho i think the tech isn't quite there - we're just not ready yet for widespread adaptation. It's coming but it's not quite got it yet. Like the steam engine before the ICE. It was in use, it COULD be used, but just too problematic for widespread adaption outside of specific circumstances. I think we're one or two breakthroughs away from a true solution that meets all your critera. In the meantime i do support it's use where it IS a good option and viable, and i think we should support that. I just don't think we should expect too much from the tech just yet.

Hard to say. I have to admit that most of the women i talk to feel the same but this polling data suggests otherwise. Of course it does differ a little between provinces. And age groups. I'm just curious as to why the gap is this big. Historically there's often a SMALL gap between men and women regarding a specific leader, but it's usually pretty small. More like a 'margin of error' size so to speak. This is pretty significant. LIke the headline said - women would probably reelect him, where men would vote him out in droves and give the cpc a majority. That's a big gap.

Don't blame me for the article or the facts. Jokes aside women have decided they still like the guy and that is worthy of discussion. Sorry if facts offend you, And no - i didn't blame trudeau for world inflation, I blamed him for canada's inflation. It was YOU who tried to dismiss his mishandling of the economy and infliation as just being 'world inflation'. But - there IS no 'world inflation' - most of the countries on that graph are below us. Some are experiencing very average inflation. SOME countries also made bad decisions with money and are experiencing higher inflation and some are more affected directly by war (germany). But - many made better choices and are not. And i get you want to stop the thread because you're a liberal supporter and his unpopularity is uncomfortable for you but - you don't have to watch the thread if you don't want to.

Sure - biden is not popular at all in teh states right now because of his overspending and inflationary policies. Biden is less popular than trump was when he was pres. At least THEIR women have brains. Our inflation should be about 2 percent lower than it is. That's a big deal . Interest rates would be MUCH lower if the feds had worked WITH the banks instead of increasing spending while the banks are desperately trying to slow it down. You have to be 7 kinds of stupid not to realize that things economically are far worse because of Trudeau. Even the banks and budget officers admit his policies have added a minimum of 1.5 percent inflation. Obviously men get it - they realize Trudeau is a bad person and is also responsible for the economic issues we face largely. What does it take to make women realize that they're throwing away their future and the future of their kids leaving that corrupt incompetent loser in power?

Every federal department is screwed at the moment. Customs is no different. Our airports are a disaster, getting a passport is a disaster, everything is. Welcome to trudeau's canada. Voters chose hair over skill and this is what you get. You'll have to live with it till someone else gets in and manages to de-trudeau this mess.

These are all life saving safety features. And it's actually wrong. We had seat belts before mandates.

Soooo - the fact it was written by men who never saw jesus doesn't matter because those men SAAAAY that they they had letters from someone who did. Who may nor may not have been accurately recording the truth. Do you need me to actually explain why that's dumb? I SWEAR that my napkin has proof on it that your'e wrong. I didn't see that myself but someone told me. Now i've written that down for you. So it must be true right? I spoke an eye witness. Honest. And lets face it - that's to be expected. Obviously god doesn't want there to be proof. If he wanted people to believe based on their being evidence he'd just put giant letters of fire in the sky saying 'Believe in me or you're all salt. Seriously- get worshipping or i will flood your asses again right now, i'm totally serious". That'd do it. But no. So he doesn't want there to be proof. And there isn't. So you're wrong.

"Lets give women the vote - what could go wrong?" FFS. Is this really about the hair? I get that he's sexier than Pollievre. But surely even women can't approve of the corruption and the inflation and all that. Surely they care about their children if nothing else and teh future they're going to have - or not going to have thanks to Justin's policies. They can't be THAT obvious - what is making them think like this? How can they still think justin is ok?

I'm not finding anything like that either. Just more hatred based attempts at dividing people.

Yawn. Wake me up if there's a day when he DOESN'T"T threaten serious escalation.

This is the left wing these days. Sure there are moderate people on the left - but the farther left usually find them and beat them into submission pretty quick but interestingly this is EXACTLY what the nazi's used as their method for gaining power. Divide people into groups, then set one group on another smaller group and offer to help the group deal with the 'problem" of the smaller group. It's "real" germans against the gypsies! No - the Jews! No it's socialists agains the Commies, no it's germany against the evil trio (B, F, US), No - it's POLAND that's the real threat. And they're hardly alone or even innovative in that. Gov'ts long before and after have used it. Obama formed the intersectional coalition based on that - turn gays, blacks, hispanics, trans, immigrants etc etc into little groups and get them to hate other people by fanning the culture wars and spreading division and hate. Then step in and say i'm on your side and scoop the votes.

Prove it. You can't. My sacred napkin says it's fiction. The napkin has spoken. This has been gone over for hundreds of years. Sorry - every actual expert including most religious experts agree that you cannot prove the bible is not a work of fiction. Some of it appears to be testimony but we know that most of the works were written well after the fact. And many parts of the bible don't even have that element, they're just recountings of old stories. Who exactly saw moses come off the mount and wrote down what was happening? Would NOBODY be the correct answer? And any author can have their character state they saw something Watch this: And Jack said unto me: "Matthew Mark Luke and John all conspired in a tavern to write a work of fiction they would sell as a religion to make easy bucks. I know this for i was there and saw with my own eyes and heard with my own ears". Wow - sounds like eye witness stuff to me! Bible exposed! The bible may well be based on some events or the like but it is like mostly a work of fiction. And you can't prove me wrong. So treating it like it's a proven fact rather than a personal belief just makes you look like you aren't good at thinking. Like i said, saying that YOU believe it's accurate and that god has touched your life is one thing. Claiming that it's a definitively accurate work is LESS honest than claiming evolution has been proven as the source of life.

It's SOOOO important to you that you'll give up and let others run it for you Lol. C'mon. That's not a real answer. And democracy is by it's very nature a patchwork in progress. Spit stick and hope is it's wheelhouse and always has been BTW - your comment reminded me of a great humourous quote from an american politician so i'll share it - "Democracy is WAY too important to be left to the people." Anyway - in a democracy the world is run by those who show up. So show up. In the hopes that like minded people will join you and bring change. Welcome to democracy.

well at least you admit you're a bigot and hate monger Sure you are. The idea that certain political classes are an inferior breed is definitely one of theirs. So far you havent' even started to tell the truth. All you have are lies. Frankly with that level of lies and hatred you're making the nazi's look good. As a person, you should be deeply deeply ashamed of yourself. But of course you're not, you're THAT kind of person.

It has a slight ring of truth to it that makes it believable but - i dont' see the liberals OR the conservatives really doing anything for land ownership. So i'm not sure i see how it would impact us here?

No it isn't - the answer is on my sacred napkin. How could you doubt that? Sorry - there is nothing in the bible that proves the bible is superior to others. It's not even remotely close to being evidence. It's just a work of fiction. Can you produce these 'witnesses'? Can you provide independent interviews with the witnesses? No? Hmmm. My napkin tells me that he never did die, he managed to live till they took him down. So there you go. My napkin says 700 people saw this. The napkin has spoken.

I say it is - and i wrote that down on a sacred napkin i have here so it must be true. Look, it's written right here. A reasonable person would just obey the napkin and accept what i'm saying. You can't question the napkin. That's literally what you sound like. Seeing as you can't prove that it's not an imaginary friend or voices in your head you don't have any ability to dispute what i said. Sorry - the napkin has spoken. Billions would agree with me. Many billions, So does that make me right? Hell there's 1.1 billion hindu alone. They don't think your god is real. They think their gods are real. why are they wrong and you right? No answer? Hmmmm Look - if you're finding comfort in your religious beliefs then more power to you. It's not possible to show evidence of god's existence, but i also can't prove he doesn't exist. And i respect people's personal beliefs and if you're feeling like it's making your life better that's a positive thing. Hell - even if the bible IS wrong it's still a pretty good set of rules and principles to guide you in life. You just need to learn to keep that PERSONAL belief personal. YOU may believe that your god is real and is the one true god, but that's something you should keep in your heart, not try to force upon others. IT's not valid to say that I should be taking your god as anything BUT your imaginary friend. I'm entitled to my beliefs as well.

Ima go ahead and put my money on 'lie through teeth" Well that and i suspect she'll filibuster a lot and also claim security issues and refuse to answer a number of things. And the usual deflection tricks - claiming she can't speak on behalf of others when asked what they were told, not fully understanding the question and having to ask for clarification 100 times, etc.

Also it looks like trudeau took the issue off the table by ordering her to appear rather than take the hit of being forced to. This just isn't going away easily for him

There are always good decisions. Including participating in the party to select candidates and leaders and set policy and priority. those are good decisions. Also forming lobby groups to pressure for what you want is not a bad idea - gun owners certainly learned that. Then they kind of forgot it and now look. It's too easy to say 'oh, i don't like the system so i give up'. Sorry - if you want democracy you have to work at it