Jedi_Master_Tallyn

The way I remember it is that CO goes up the the O zone and take a atom or messes up a molocule or something and becomes something else like C2O I think I dont remember right now. And that was how wholes in the O zone wear formed. Am I miss remembering and it was CO goes up and becomes extra CO2 and that is the problem???

Ok see I was taught that to CO in high school there in lies the confusion.

My bad I was not clear I mean "The actual political arena" this is just people discussing it. And my opinion is I don't understand it but I do understand that it has to do with mental health and trama and how are brains deal with it and treatment. Which I do not having the schooling for so can only make uneducated guesses.

Same for anyone else but dismissing their opinions because they having bad facts dismisses them as people. And that is wrong no matter what. Disagree fine intelligent argument to persuade them otherwise.

CO2 is something that confuses me actually the way I remember learning it in the 90's: CO2 is Carbon Dioxide which is what plants need to breath out O2 so humans can breath out CO2 CO carbon monoxide is car exhaust and bad for the environment. When did that change??????

If want a revolution in the United States you might want to rethink that Riots are a Crime period FACT. Also a fact who has the most guns, I personally would rather NOT go back to the 1950's. Civil right movement done peacefully take time and patience, you other option is revolution. See above. There will NEVER be in my OPINION a good reason to riot when a peaceful protest gets a lot more done. Just ask Dr. King.

I am fairly certain you just proved my point. I said I believe this is a mental health issue and belongs there not the political arena. It is not ok for anyone to score political points off of people with mental issues.

There is so much wrong with that statement. 1."No one should care about the opinions of people who are.." This is dismissive and belittling their opinion matters it matters most because you disagree with it their for you need to understand it so you can intelligently argue against it and help them come to your way of thinking. 2. "Arguing FACTS is NOT childish." You are right it isn't ignoring fact you do agree with or that make you point hard to make is. Not like the fact about volcanos because it make it hard to blame fossil fuels does not make it any less a fact. And ignoring it mean they can say you did not account for ALL of the variables. The opinions of those that disagree with you are the most important opinions out there, the ones that agree with are convinced the ones that aren't need convincing no matter what facts they know or don't belittling them and calling them stupid because they don't know all the facts you do means you do not value them as a person. And you just lost their vote. I was not aware about the Venus thing sorry about that.

Well lets see.... Asphalt is man made concrete is man made coal is still used in some places as a viable fuel source. I am not saying that fossil fuel emissions are not the problem try reading the ENTIRE post before calling me out. I merely said saying fossil fuels are not all of the problem and not acknowledging that gives the deniers all the ammunition they need to argue against. Do volcanos cause just a much CO as cars. Yes can we do anything about that. No, but it still happens. Not admitting that SOME of the temperature change comes from all that asphalt concrete and glass the REFLECTS heat BACK into the atmosphere WARMING THE AIR is asking to be de bunked. I pointed out several way HUMANS have caused climate change to debunk what the original poster said but I also acknowledged. That we are no where near a solution to this. Also saying "that man controls" is wrong its HUMANS cause last time I checked their are nearly as many female drivers as male. I also admitted I do not know what the solution maybe. But I do know what I BELIEVE it is not turbines that used that much oil are not a good replacement lithium batteries are not a good replacement. Fusion or fission? I do not know enough to make a informed decision on that except to say I do not believe we have the safety protocols in place to make that viable. It is going to take time and research. And if you want to win over the moderates you need to think like one. More than one way of looking at the problem is correct. People that disagree with are not automatically stupid. It is attitudes like that, that caused President Trump. Take a breath and look at the whole argument, admit to stating opinions, and argue your case. And remember ALL of this is theory nothing has been labeled as scientific fact just yet because they have been able to prove otherwise or that you did not account for all of the variables and so the debate rages. And like it or not blaming all environmental problems on just fossil fuel is as silly as blaming gun crimes on guns. The reason the lefties CONSTANTLY looses these fights is because you insult anyone that disagrees with you. (you are no better righties) And THAT is why the middle is fed up with both of you. Grow up, will you please. p.s. Venus really? and you wonder why no one takes your arguments seriously.

Stereotyping is beneath you, saying all churches is like saying all left handed humans. It gets you in trouble and allows for counter arguments. I am a Christian, or at least I consider myself one. I prefer the new testament though especially since most of the old was getting us ready for Jesus. Or at least that is my take. The God I pray too said love one another. Full stop. Not love one another unless... The God I pray too said let he without sin cast the first stone. So I try not to judge my fellow human to harshly. My morals, and the ones I have tried to pass down to my children are of love and forgiveness. Someday I hope someone points out to the Jews, the Christians, the Muslims, and the Islamics that they are ALL praying to the same god. And that that God is a God of Love and forgiveness. You want to fix the world L O V E. Love one another. Try it.

Each wind turbine needs 80 gallons of oil as lubricant and we're not talking about vegetable oil, this is a PAO synthetic oil based on crude... 12,000 gallons of it. That oil needs to be replaced once a year. This needs to be addressed, the current alternatives are NOT viable. Until we have a viable alternative the moderates are not going to care enough about this to make traction. Lithium batteries which are used in electric cars are actually worse for the environment that fossil fuel consumption. The fossil fuel problem does need to be addressed, but you can not ignore things like asphalt, concrete and glass in major cities. Which OMG cause climate change. Unless something happened I am not aware of large cities covered in asphalt, concrete, and glass are made by humans; therefore; humans do in fact effect climate change. Humans build wave breaks to stop water from going to far inland and causing damage. This also effects the climate. Human put out forest fires rather than letting them burn. Want to tell me that does not effect the environment. Saying human can not effect climate change is a ridiculous untrue statement that anyone with common sense can de bunk. Looky here I just did it. And with out attacking anyone or any name calling. Tolerance does not just mean being tolerant of your friends it mean being tolerant of your enemies as well. I do not know what the solution is but science and engineering are tools that can be used to find it. Do we need a replacement for fossil fuels? Unequivocally YES! Is the emissions thing as bad as they make it out to be? Not really, to much proof that several other factors also contribute just as much or MORE to the rise in global temperature. Get over yourselves and grow up; scientific fact in my life time alone the global average temp has risen 2 degrees. That's 4 decades. That is something that usually happens over several centuries. Look it up its true... I'll wait.

Wind Farms consume huge amounts of oil to lubricate those turbines as I said earlier the alternatives are not ready. It is going to take years of research that is not hampered by the oil conglomerates or the major car companies. Who would have to re design their entire model lines. Also no one going to address the effect of Asphalt concrete and glass covering the earth thanks to large cities?

The problem is some are trying to rush the change the alternatives are not yet ready, the fossil fuel conglomerates have gone in a ensured that they own the patents for most alternative fuel ideas to slow down their development. It is a sound business strategy if a horrible ethical one. How can your product be replaced if you own all the patents for its replacement?

ok you had me until this here. Riots are NOT justice they are crimes. Rioting to try and get justice proves the people you are rioting against right when they say "blank is a bunch of criminals" Rioting is why the moderates have little to no sympathy when injustice happens. Peaceful protest are one thing and CONSTITUTIONALLY protected. Riots are crimes that more often than not tear up the neighborhoods of those rioting.

I noticed my first three post were quickly approved it has been several hours and the next several have not. I have not received a warning or anything so I was wondering if need to do some editing or if it was just a coincidence. Hitting the first three near a approval cycle. and the rest needed to wait longer?

I take it you are going to ignore my post?

Toxicity like this is why they are winning. Keep up the good work. You need to re watch this. Warning adult language. If this violates please remove.

Lets all take a breath and stop with the "you're a Nazi; no you're a Nazi" nonsense. Firstly I don't think either of you support or want a return to that little political movement so lets move on. First and for most I do not understand this issue at all. It makes no sense to me unless I look at it from a mental health stand point. In which case it becomes either doctors catering to their patients psychosis, or treatment that I do not understand and is NONE OF MY BUSINESS!!!! This issue belongs in medical journals not the political ring and shame on who ever brought it here. I view this the exact same way I view gay marriage as a Christian "God said love one another full stop; he did no say love one another unless.. " What happens in your bedroom is your business unless you decide to make it my business. In which case I get to comment on it. You can choose to ignore or debate the comment at that point but we both need to recognize what is being stated is opinion not fact. Scientific fact their are three genders for humans: male female and in transition. Mental health fact: The brain deals with trauma and experiences we can not cope with or understand at the time in way we have yet to understand. Treatment of these conditions can often seem bizarre to those not in the mental health profession. I am not a mental health professional, I do not know how to properly read a article from a mental health journal and comprehend all of the nuances of what was said. Also I stopped listening to the talking heads during Clinton's Presidency so I do not really care what they are saying about this. In my opinion this is much ado about nothing and keeping us the gen pub from asking both sides of the aisle why we are arguing about this instead of fixing something that really matters like I don't know education? health care? poverty? The only way this issue should matter to the Federal Government is concerning the Census.

I would like all you abortion is murder people that say yes to this question to justify this stance. I am a Christian, I watched a young catholic girl who was raped by her uncle and got pregnant from it be force to carry to term because of her parents beliefs. I watched as fellow students in middle school called the young girl a whore because she did not wish to discuss the circumstances of her pregnancy with others. I watched as they drug her reputation down to the point than even she BELIEVED that she asked for it. Oh and before you play the men are pigs card know that the worst offenders were other girls that were jealous because our victim was one of the pretties girl in that grade and a cheerleader. So while I understand the need for medical abortions, including mental health abortions. I do not agree with the "I like unprotected sex but don't want a kid abortion" What happened to these girls, disgust me. To defend this degenerate to even think of forcing this girl to carry to term is why the left comes at the right so hard. And don't think you are innocent lefties, I don't care who you are; partial birth abortion is murder, and anyone that would defend it has NEVER been hungry. It is also the reason the pro lifers gained so much traction on you over the last few years. You went to far and turned away a lot of moderates. And while I will never agree with how far most of them have gone in turning over Roe v Wade I have trouble defending pro choice. Even though my daughter would have died without an abortion due to a miscarriage that her body was not rejecting and was poisoning her. I have been hungry, and I can not defend anyone that advocates partial birth abortion. Medical reason, yes I understand them, mental health reasons fall under medical reasons for me. Birth control or political statement abortions, you are giving the pro lifers all the ammunition they need to turn the argument against you. And while some of you may call me a hypocrite for my stance on this understand that I will NEVER consider this a black and white issue that can be answered with a yes or a no. This is a nuanced issue that has layers and swerves that require looking at it with understanding. This is one of those grey area issues that no one will ever agree on and an intelligent person can make a case that agrees with both sides. The problem is that every one on either side of the issue want all or nothing, no one is willing to compromise.

This is the same group of fans that once booed Santa Claus, and this surprises you? You need higher standards for shocking behavior, never put ANYTHING past a Philley sports fan they are miserable and hate everything.

And yet none of you even mentioned the largest contributor to climate change, the one no one talks about and everyone forgets. Asphalt and concrete, asphalt and concrete are responsible for more climate change than ANYTHING else, don't believe me? Think I am crazy? Here is some home truths I'll let you research. How much has the average temperature gone up in large cities as the heat absorbent dirt is covered with the heat reflective asphalt concrete and glass? How much has rain run off been effected in large cities as the water absorbent dirt is cover in the the same material that water simply runs off of to find dirt so it can be absorbed and replenish the earth. Stop and think about that for a minute and check the numbers. Then please please come tell me about how these asphalt roads these concrete and glass buildings are all natural phenomenon and that I am a crazy person for suggesting such things. Of course we effect the climate of this planet; simply by existing we effect our surroundings, with out words and actions. The only way you are not effect the environment around you is if you are living in a bubble. Humans give off heat as well we put out forest fires instead of letting them burn, we build waves breaks to try and stop the Ocean from sending waves far inland. Car emissions are bad yes fossil fuels are bad agreed. But to say we cannot change the environment? Pull the other one my friend it has bells.

Why not use 10th Grade Biology? This is the way I remember it being taught to me in the 90's. "The human race is part of the animal kingdom and is called homo-sapien-sapien. Simple scientific fact. There no separation based on: 1. Skin pigment 2. Region of birth 3.Language spoken 4. Whom ever you choose to pray too 5. Sexual attraction Just the human race period. I therefor postulate that our leaders and the mainstream media do not want to stamp out "racism" because if they did what else would they have to throw at the other side to instantly destroy any credibility they might have. Besides a sex scandal name for me something that will destroy a candidate faster than calling them a racist whether it can be proven or not. So why stop "racism when it is such a valuable tool to attack your political opponents with? It is up to us the gen pub to take racism away from them to destroy it we have to stop giving racist attention unless it is to argue against them calmly and rationally. Do not hate them pity them and educate them the skin pigment does not equal a separate race, being born in x region does not equal a separate race, so forth and so on. That is just my take on it and what I tried to teach my kids. We are all brothers and sisters in humanity.