Jump to content

Hodad

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

Everything posted by Hodad

  1. As always, you creeps show your true colors. Unfortunately it's an ugly shade of treasonous yellow. You don't care a bit about democracy or the will of the people. To hell with the will of the people! You'll use violence to force them to live according to your will instead. You little fascists are just detestable.
  2. No, not really. If you were incapable of understanding the relationship between rates and raw numbers the first 20 times, you're not likely to understand it the 21st time.
  3. The fact that you keep bringing this up is hilarious. It's like you can't help but remind people of how dim you are. You needn't go to the trouble. Trust me, nobody needs reminding.
  4. Classy, as always. Trump is not a smart man. Does he really think challenging Harris' blackness is a winning play? Didn't work with Obama, won't with with Harris. Stupid white men might eat this stuff up, but for everyone else it's a massive turn off.
  5. We should all be so blissfully ignorant as to get our "news" from kooky conspiracy chain emails.
  6. Maybe he's serious. Thanks to this perverse SCOTUS, if the president does it, it's not illegal.
  7. Why do you expect that? He's tried multiple times and was stopped by the adults in the room. His plan for term two is to exclude people who might tell him "no." So who will be there to stop him? And this notion that Democrats have "weaponized" the justice system is absurd. His behavior was beyond the pale, totally unprecedented and unacceptable--and yes, illegal. I never thought I'd see the day when any significant portion of Americans would be willing to toss out democracy--end the American experiment for the sake of one vile man--but somehow Republicans have gone there. There are few people who more deserve to be held accountable for their crimes than Trump. It's not weaponization, just basic justice.
  8. You may be new to reading, but approval and favorability are two different polls.
  9. I know your view of the world is shaped by your "feelings" rather than by information (and surely things are weird inside the bubbling cauldron of misogyny and xenophobia that is your mind) but Harris is far from the least liked politician in America. Take, just as one example, her opponent in the upcoming election. Trump, is less liked and more disliked, ya poor dumb bastard. Harris’ overall favorability rose from 35% to 43% compared to a week earlier, while the vice president’s unfavorability rating fell from 46% to 42%, ... Trump also saw his favorability rating drop in the poll, falling from 40% last week to 36% in the most recent poll. The former president’s unfavorable rating also ticked up slightly in the new poll, rising from 51% to 52%.
  10. Obviously, this fake scandal is factually incorrect. It's clearly NOT meant to be the last supper. The craziest thing is that none of the crazies who were freaking out about this will absorb that information and unwind their outrage. "Yeah, I overacted. Sorry." Won't happen. Instead, the whole thing will be calcified and added to the list of phony grievances to be recited ad nauseum in the liturgy of victimhood.
  11. Great. If I see a doddering old Canadian lurking around my polling place I'll wave. 🙄
  12. Maybe those who believe in Greek mythology should be offended instead. Or maybe those who believe in Christian mythology and managed to work themselves into a tizzy should try reading a book other than the Bible. 🙄 Jeebus, this is the dumbest game culture war "scandal" yet.
  13. It must be farking exhausting.
  14. He says, while spending every day obsessing over the politics of another country.
  15. Is that how politics works? How are you not Trump's pick for VP?!?
  16. I think that's probably how it SHOULD be, but I have never seen anyone play the victim card as loudly, as frequently and as persistently as Trump, and his people eat it up. 🤷‍♂️
  17. Elise Stefanik. Women's rights were such a powerful issue in the midterms. JD Vance is the sort of guy who thinks the Handmaid's Tale is more roadmap than cautionary tale. A more moderate woman might have helped temper the backlash from women voters.
  18. That's certainly how they'll campaign. Up with the workers, down with the elite! Let's invite a teamster! Not how they'll govern, of course.
  19. Noooope. As a raging narcissist, Trump thinks more Trump is the right answer for everything. "Let's add another objectively unqualified celebrity populist flamethrower to the ticket and see if that helps." Trump was in no danger of losing his cultishly devoted base (who aren't politically sophisticated and will applaud this "more" strategy heartily). He didn't need to double down there. A smarter campaign would have taken advantage of the opportunity to diversify the portfolio and appeal to other facets of the party and to independent voters. America is polarized enough that it's nearly binary, so this misstep may not cost him the race, but it certainly won't help him broaden his appeal or provide any sense that we have a good backup plan for a POTUS who is pushing 80 years old. It's not comforting to look in the cockpit of the plane and see one erratic old pilot joined by an erratic student pilot just getting his first flight hours.
  20. Though you were not honorable enough to admit it, I will take this as a concession that your claim that Harris supported riots was a falsehood. Opposition to the cash bail system is an entirely different conversation. Indeed, we should not have a cash bail system. There is no justice in it. It nakedly embraces a two tiered justice system with one path for the wealthy and another for the poor. Money should not be the deciding factor in who remains in jail or who goes free while awaiting trial. As a prosecutor, Harris had a front-row seat to that injustice, and I applaud her for taking a stand on it. Do you think that a person's financial status should determine whether an accused person should sit in jail or not? Does that seem sensible or fair to you?
  21. Again, you degenerate farking liar. NOTHING there to indicate that Trump's FBI and Trump's DOJ did anything whatsoever at the behest of or on behalf of the Democrats. If you want to criticize the FBI or DOJ of the Trump administration, that's a conversation, but lying about some preposterous conspiracy is just stupid.
  22. ^^She keeps saying this, but I don't think she knows what it means.
  23. It's a "documented fact" that you're a pathological liar. Nowhere, in any court, nor anywhere else outside of your fictional narrative, does it say that Trump's FBI or Trump's DoJ did anything on behalf of Democrats. 🙄
  24. You're lying. That is, quite literally and explicitly, a conversation about protests, not riots. Harris also explicitly condemned violent riots. Harris, a U.S. senator who previously served as California's attorney general, said she supported peaceful protesters. "We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence, including the shooter who was arrested for murder. And make no mistake, we will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice," Fox "news" and meme culture are not a substitute for reality.
  25. This coming from a guy who got zero votes in the Democratic primary. Bottom of the pack!🥸
×
×
  • Create New...