ExFlyer

LOL You are trying to tell conspiracy theorist to move on God luck with that LOL You notice there are almost 2000 post in this thread. Most all of them are from 5 or 6 posters feeding each others conspiracy thoughts. LOL

1. I stand corrected 2. No, the pride flag means one thing and one thing only. Symbology is a different topic. 3. 4 5 Yes, pride is a month and that is my displeasure. Why a month. No other celebration (other than religious ) is a month. 6. I completely disagree. Most people are not OK with it. Thing is that it is not politically correct to say so... you will be demeaned and called out if you don't so, they say nothing ad let the m be. 7. There was lots of "gay" talk 10 years ago. It is just that now every sexual or whatever group has jumped on the bandwagon. Your acronym grows constantly LOL Most people do not even know, let alone care, what clothes or costumes or who's bed you boink in with whomever you want. The fact your group is constantly advertising, playing victim and "celebrating" is getting old and tiresome as you seem to be aware of.

1. There is no semantics about my comment. Not displaying the flag opens up the criticism from that community. BTW, "semantics" is the use of language, not comparison of symbols. 2. I am not sure what your retort is supposed to mean? I am talking about raising a flag, painting a crosswalk and bench. 3. I splice nothing. I am stating a fact. The fact is that the pride flag flies for the month and no other flag flies for that period. 4. I believe that their "inclusion" or not is imagined. No one cares and a display for an entire month obviously does not change perception. I think the flag is a symbol of sexual choice and recognize it..but I do not need to see it celebrated for an entire month every year. We do not do it for any other reason for an entire month. A week ...well OK but really, a month every year seems like pushing it down peoples throats. This comes up every year and the rhetoric and arguments are the same year after year after year. Imagine, a year with no display... who would miss it beside the lgqb2sq+++ folks wanting to prance and play???

I have lived in Ottawa many decades and this debate has been going on for even longer than that. We all know that doing a renovation costs way more than building new. It will pretty well have to be demolished to fix all the issues that are with the residence now. So, the extra steps of knocking down the external walls would not be a big step. Actually, I think that half way through any renovation, it will be determined that it needs demolishing anyway. Personally I think the building needs to be demolished from the beginning and a new one built. The problem, with that is it will be a government project and will take longer than buying aircraft or ships to get done LOL The other problem is those old folks that have some sort of emotional attachment to a decaying building. Every city has them and they are a pain in the ass as they do not have to pay for anything they want.

Interestingly, "the flag" has become a means of intimidation for the lgbqt4s+++ crowd. Don't paint the crosswalks or the bench or raise the flag and you will get nothing but bad reaction and comment from that community. It is the only "other" flag that is hoisted at city halls and schools and elsewhere for an entire month other than the Canadian or Provincial or official flags. Don't fly the flag or paint or commemorate and the organization that does not will be fully chastised.

Did he ? Seems there are 2 reports. NSICOP and CSIS. I believe May spoke of the CSIS report. Not sure what sing is speaking to. One report is done by the Security Agency which has no political affiliation and the other is by sitting MP's and Senators. One report did not have a list of names the other, I am not sure. If NSICOP has a list of names, is it also top secret and is jagmeet divulging secret info? That last question is, why is one report different than the other? Were the mandates the same? Here is the NSICOP report: https://www.nsicop-cpsnr.ca/reports/rp-2024-06-03/special-report-foreign-interference.pdf

Where in your book does god or jesus say Gay is Good? LOL

OK, you have to come up with something because it does not fit your narrative. Sometimes, it is what it is. 🤦🏾

One not spoken?? LOL But that is moot

I do not know anything that is in the report except what was said by Elizabeth May in her press conference.. I do know the report is top secret and only persons with top secret clearance can see it. I do know that one person that has that clearance has openly said there were no list and only one person was named and that person, an ex MP, should be investigated and charged. As I understand, the CSIS investigation and resulting report was to determine if there were any MP's engaged with foreign countries that may have interfered with our elections. As the one person willing to discuss it said, no sitting MP was mentioned. I am not "telling everyone move on nothing worth your time here" at all, what I am telling is that, as the person that read the report said there was no sitting MP's named in the report and and only an ex MP was named.is an ex MP. Speculation is just that, speculation. If you wish to call Elizabeth a liar, by all means, be my guest.

I stopped reading your post after the first sentence. Somehow you seem to indicate that you know the content in the CSIS report, regardless that it is top secret.

If it makes you feel better to say that.....then by all means say it LOL

And I was saying pride lasts a month.... Seems you have issues with keeping up LOL

Who said anything about shutting down an entire city?? Except you? I said "here it is an entire month all over the city." about Pride in response to events that are 6 hours in Reno.

Well, here it is an entire month all over the city.

It is what I have been saying from the beginning...wait for the facts to come out.

That is exactly what hypothesis and theorems are..... they seem like but not yet proven for fact.

She said there was one name...an ex MP Your comprehension issues rising up again LOL

I am quite capable of staying on topic, not where yourmind seems to be wandering LOL I made my comment regarding who has issues with gays....and it seems you are on that list LOL

How the F do you know it has names?? Are you secret cleared and read the report?? I have no stake in a CSIS report and neither does any political party. The investigation and report are outside of government control. You normally are a receptive and knowledgeable poster but are falling into the conspiracy hole. Sad you are dipping in thst direction.

Ok, so you are saying that the CSIS report said one former MP may have done something don't believe them? On what basis? Media? PP? You are saying CSIS lied on the report You are saying May lied in her press conference? I think that you need a lot more evidence than your say so to back up your accusations. I am very surprised at your dip into the conspiracy pool

Man, you just don't read the information LOL There were no names, so says someone that actually read the report. Wait, let me reinforce that, there was one name and she said he should be investigated and charged. Considering he is no longer an MP, she could not name him. PP decided not to accept the security clearance and if he does become PM, he will have to sign and then he will keep secrets from you. LOL I was in the Military and had secret clearance. I cannot, to this day, divulge things aI read, saw and were briefed on. Such is signing the declaration requirements of security clearances.

I, as well as you, have been travelling out of country many times (detached, business and pleasure). The degraded opinion of Canada is not new and has been going downhill for a very long time. We, Canada and Canadians, had a great reputation. There was even a time when citizens from other countries (mainly Americans) wore Maple Leaf patches and pins and buttons but no longer. I used to have Canada flag and Maple Leaf pins to give out but no longer do that either.

WTF is wrong with you?? She saw and read the report, in it's entirety as she has the required security clearance which is something PP doers not have so he cannot read it. You are clearly completely ignorant of what a secret security clearance is and how to get it and what it entitles you to read. Are actually daft enough to think that a political party can manipulate a secret report when provided to a person with the clearance? Man, what a pathetic uninformed loser LOL https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/politics/may-has-no-worries-about-traitors-in-parliament-after-reading-intelligence-committee-report-1.6922179 https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/green-leader-elizabeth-may-says-no-list-of-disloyal-mps-in-full-spy-watchdog-report/ar-BB1o216T