ExFlyer

You have shown shit all. Only thing shown is reinforce your conspiracy club presidency LOL Her are the exact words again "Her guest essay in Sunday’s Times, titled “Why the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points,” takes readers through the so-called lab leak hypothesis" Hypothesis: "A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review." If she had proof, it would be a scientific paper, not a guest essay LOL Essay "An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, ..." So,you are defending an imagination making it a conspiracy , as you always do. Yup, you are just confirming you are a F'n loser again LOL

And, as I said, some Canadian funding from the Winnipeg labs where they dismissed and ejected 2 Chinese scientists.

F'n loser president speaks some more.....BS LOL Hey, say what you want, the topic is about some persons editorial and it is self admitted hypothesis.....like your diatribe.... no poof,

Chuckle. The Vice President , or is it the President of the repolitics conspiracy theory club speaks....far too much LOL Yeah but none of them have positive proof. LOL Only hypothesis LOL "Unless you can prove otherwise that is the most likely case." all theory and hypothesis, no proof. Lots of BS but no evidence to prove their theory. LOL My theory is that you are an a$$ but...it is only a hypothesis LOL Keep going Pres LOL

or a "Hypothesis"? LOL https://www.livescience.com/34052-unsolved-mysteries-physics.html or https://www.livescience.com/34052-unsolved-mysteries-physics.html or https://www.famousscientists.org/10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-were-later-debunked/ Point is, theories or hypothesis are not fact.

Key is "theory" There are lots of unproven theories out there. I can make some up and so can you. Here are some https://science.howstuffworks.com/dictionary/12-of-the-most-mind-blowing-scientific-theories-ever-conceived.htm Here are some more https://www.livescience.com/11375-top-ten-conspiracy-theories.html

And the saga with conspirators goes on ...and on....and on LOL Here it is again, from the link, from the editorial .. "HYPOTHISIS. THEORY". "Wuhan was not capable of containing an airborne virus " Someones rectal pluck and you folks suck it up as fact LOL

It is you that does not understand the point Here it is again "HYPOTHISIS. THEORY". "Wuhan was not capable of containing an airborne virus " I do not imply anything. These are direct quotes from the story. No facts, that is the point

Hey, I am not a conspirator so, I read what is written when it is, right from the beginning a hypothesis and then admitted theory. There is nothing to believe. It is an opinion, like so many conspirators are jumping on. So, my opinion, whether you like it or not is that the editorial is just conjecture. Not a debatable issue with me just as the 1.8 K topic about covid is also just a half dozen conspirators stroking each other ad infinitum. LOL

Another thread for the covid conspirators to feed on "Her guest essay in Sunday’s Times, titled “Why the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points,” takes readers through the so-called lab leak hypothesis." "but Chan sees it as one point among several that buttress her theory." " third point is that the lab in Wuhan was not capable of containing an airborne virus as infectious as the one that started the pandemic." Key words....HYPOTHISIS. THEORY LOL "Whether the pandemic started on a lab bench or in a market stall,” Chan writes in her conclusion, “it is undeniable that U.S. federal funding helped to build an unprecedented collection of SARS-like viruses at the Wuhan institute, " as did Canadian funding and research in the Winnipeg labs. But hey, the conspirators love to run with this stuff. I wait for definitive proof one way or the other.

When I first visited Ontario in the late 70's (I am from BC) , there was a Mens and Womens side of any pub with a wall between them. You could only get a glass of beer in 6 ounce glasses. You could not go and get a case of beer, you had to fill out a form and someone went in the back and got it for you. Empties all over was a problem with BC's lack of a recycle program. Lots of changes over the years in all provinces. I think Ontario paid Beer Store because they intend to sell beers etc a year earlier than initially announced.

Spent a lot of time doing business in Europe and can say they drive as much as we do....and in many cases, much faster. Can also say, I saw a lot less police over there too. Seems police revenue generation is more important here.

Key..."did not respond to a request for comment " "environmental exposure – or a combination of exposures" which is an opinion with no substantiation. There could be bad moonshine, inbreeding, poor diet, any other of numerous ailment but...there is no proof of anything after 4 years of study and investigation. "said one young woman"? really...one young woman? Maybe aliens?? LOL LOL LOL

Bible Thumping Hypocrite. regards.

Look, to me, it is just one pissed of neurologist that got cut off of his cash cow. I have beaten this dead horse. Have a good day.

So, one "expert" and one doctor felt dissed by "an independent oversight committee created by the province" and "A final report from the committee, which concluded there was no “cluster” of people suffering from an unknown brain syndrome, signalled the end of the province’s investigation." What did I miss? One doctor vs "an independent oversight committee " My point exactly....you are OK with paying "total cost of bonuses; inquiries, commissions, compensations etc. " for yada which will not change anything?? LOL

1. Like I said, one disgruntled person does not warrant a public inquiry. When a panel/board of professionals has determined to end a study kowtowing to the disgruntled is a waste. 2. Not sure what that means but, if I interpret your comment, the article seems to be troll bait then 3. Value if is attains a significant cost is not value.

1. I am sure there was a valid reason for halting a study after 4 year. Nothing nefarious, just no further progress was seen or noted. 2 Well, no. Like I said, conspiracies come from suppositions and insinuations. I mean, look at what is happening in the Trudeau Rumour thread... LOL 3. OK 4. Money and cost and expenses is always a factor. Costs a lot of money to bring a panel of medical, scientific and other experts to a place ot answer questions for =m laymen. 5. I think the story said all it had to say. Still boils down to one person being upset and going to the press. That is what we do nowadays can't get my way so go on social media or the press or TV or any media

My point was and is, there was a panel/committee/group of scientists and medical experts that have already determined there was no merit in continuing. Are you some way saying they were "smoothing things over"? The article never even came close to insinuating that. Those are the kinds of insinuations that conspiracys come from LOL To ask for a citizens panel makes no sense. Why? To explain to laymen why professionals made a decision? Seems like in a time when we are whining about wasting money, having a public hearing to explain scientific and medical resolutions would be a waste of money and expert time and expense. The newspaper is for sure legitimate but the story is about one disgruntled neurologist and not the findings or research or outcome of the investigation..

My take on immigration sis well known and I have said before that there should be some tighter controls and vetting My debate with you is off topic and I am pointing out your hypocritical christian self. You espouse and preach the christian biblical path and yet, when it comes to the helpless, needy and suffering, you want them cut off.

Everything you say is correct. This is one of those deals where the city pays $XX per month and everything except for driving and scheduling is done by the contractor. The building of the system is 5+ years behind and every week another announcement of delay. Reliability is disastrous. Shuttle buses and drivers for them when it shuts down have had to be bought and hired. Getting anywhere on public transit now is dubious and time consuming. More people are driving now because of the unreliability. Oh and , the latest crisis is trains stopped because the ceiling tiles in tunnels are falling down on platforms and tracks LOL

WTF does a "citizen panel" know about medical and scientific things?? Give your head a shake. Stop with the covid shit already, get over it. The government and a scientific "committee" had decided there was no merit after 4 years of investigation so, it did know better. You want them to re-open the case, spend more money to come up with the same conclusion because one pissed off guy wrote and email?? Shake your head real good LOL

Sometimes, using staff for 2 or 3 or 4 years and no new information or data comes out and the government closes the files. Then one neurologist that had only one paycheck from the government on that one file is pissed and makes a lot about nothing. The government cuts its losses and one guy is pissed. They did have a panel (they called it a committee) and the committee concluded there was nothing more to investigate. As for "public information sessions", really? What good would public information sessions be with such a specialized issue that government scientists worked on for up to 4 years without conclusions?? That would be a waste of money LOL

Huh?? Is that the pissed off neurologist take on inbreds??

No falsehood at all. You express your bible, not your opinion. If you believe being called a "bible thumper" is fine, then why are you saying it is an insult? I quoted the bible and you rejected it...because it went against your immigration diatribe. Yes, because religions are beliefs of people and one religious belief is as valid as another. Wow, anti immigrant stance or what??? Very unchristian of you. Why does it take 3 of your posts to address one of mine ?? Got ya rattled eh? LOL