West

Perhaps dig a little deeper into the case

As an aside, if true the 148 million dollar number just shows this case for what it is. Just weaponized judicial system to never challenge anything or they'll take everything from you. Shows the vile scum that Democrats support

According to Mr Guiliani's post, they are in fact the facts.

Settled out of court without an admission of wrongdoing. Those are the facts

-Keeps his possession -No admission of wrongdoing -Shake hands and go their separate ways

Possible FACE act violation as it appears they (and options pregnancy centers) were vandalized after members of Congress incited violence against them. May be an interesting few years

It does look like the Biden FBI targeted faith groups. Probably get some congressional hearings over this

Actually it's more a discussion on how one comes to form moral and philosophical conclusions which is basically the discussions that are had on an internet political forum. If you want it to be strictly academic I imagine we will run into the same issues of the same people not accepting studies that would go against their worldview. Essentially making this pretty much useless

You'll have to give me more specifics

Okay. Point me to the actual full speech in context and I'll take a listen. I've come to the conclusion that the media often selectively edits clips out of context to make a point

This was a reference to a different question. I'll tell you what. Please provide me with what you want me to read that you think will help me get to your position on Trump.

I see the Sandmann issue as kind of a final straw more so.

How so? I guess the point is while many distrust Fox, which network should we rely on?

I learned maybe a couple of months ago that people can buy and sell large social media accounts for big money. I would agree that monetization of filth is an issue but I don't think that's just one sided. The issue with the discussions around censorship on social media that I have is that it's generally one sided and used as a weapon. I see it as a psychological game.

I just find it difficult to know what is factual about Trump. Again, when I see that CNN as an example is willing to use a child as a face of one of their talking points, it would lead me to believe these are some pretty morally bankrupt people behind some of this stuff. Would you agree that this is a fair point?

For one I can't vote in the US but am interested due to friends that are there. For two, what I see is a pattern of accusations emerging against politicians. Perhaps both sides should take a step back and take them with a grain of salt?

Based on western legal systems, he is de facto innocent. Another issue I take with the left is this notion that a mere allegation is proof of anything. It's not really an American idea that one must prove they are innocent

When it reads like a tabloid level smear, then one should use that in assessing the merits. Just my two cents.

Yes. But there's obviously parameters around anything the government does. And in her opinion, who was far more familiar with the case, this did not meet the standards for a special counsel as, from what I recall, it's congress who approves a SC. This is obviously an important check in the American judicial system As an aside, the fact that folks who ran some of the other cases against Trump ran for DA office on getting Trump seems like an abuse of the office.

One of many reasons why I find it challenging to accept this at face value

You said that the federal judge who in essence tossed Jack Smith's case made a questionable ruling. Eileen Cannon is responsible for overseeing the proceedings of a trial against a citizen. She did her duty by tossing the case based on the fact Smith couldn't bring the charges to begin with. What's your credentials to say that Cannon's (the authority in the case) analysis was wrong?

So because she didn't give the opinion that you wanted it is questionable? This is sort of like Chuck Schumer threatening to "release the whirlwind" against Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, two judges. Further evidence of the radicalization of the Democrat party

Jack Smith flung a lot of poo but when it got in front of a judge it was discredited. He tried again but it just showed the man was desperate for a headline. Any reasonable person can come to that conclusion based on the sequence of events over the past few years

I have no doubt you believe Trump is Hitler. Hence my previous comment about the radicalization by the content you consume earlier. Hard to know whether or not this was "illegal" as the Georgia case also has some pretty significant holes in it.

Judge Eileen Cannon for starters who tossed the case.