West

He's just another Liberal Party clown. Also, his former firm Goldman Sachs got caught up in this scandal https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/1mdb-scandal-explained-a-tale-of-malaysias-missing-billions

Splitting hairs. I imagine you'd suggest differently if the Trump admin used questionable methods to get a secret warrant on their political adversaries.

Lol.. considering the Obama administration took questionable FISA warrants out on Trump I would say you are stretching

then why are US Senators and former state attorney generals basically saying the same thing? It's not my legal opinion dummy. I only REACT to what Senators (and former state attorney general) is saying

It's wild. Record number of inductions. Whacky judges thinking they can overstep and undermine the will of the voters.

The President issued a religious pardon which is in his purview to do. Instead of accepting the will of the people the Democrats did their "resist" bullshit and ended up harassing nuns by use of the legal system. Look I don't care what your opinions are on birth control. You shouldn't be imposing that on other people via LAWSUITS aka lawfare. It's pretty sick.

This is nonsense. Leftists have no problem using high priced lawyers to institutionally harass Christians. Their money would be spent on PAYING FOR THEIR OWN BIRTH CONTROL AND CONDOMS

You can decide. You just can't expect your Christian employer to be financially burdened by said decision if it violates religious conscience. Why the left continue to harass Christians is whacked.

https://readlion.com/in-religious-liberty-win-herzog-foundation-granted-injunction-in-case-over-biden-era-pregnancy-rule/?_hsenc=p2ANqtz-96tZrBBFQGt69GKzcf0DxQ4hzHyhMe0RvjGosZChYkwokuAhh740IDPWIWTdoj-n-o7Dw-F624LmvKfY95XpuTVya8Fw&_hsmi=352703150&fbclid=IwY2xjawJIMypleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcuRtg9zkFj3usMaa3RmKjMHXmUD_U48gXnsAeo-ZC0JQxFFxTt2B1oPOg_aem_jYU8eVjWlZTfg-XAmjujTA Here's another one.

You misread the article. Duh

Then ruled in 2020 that the Trump administration acted properly when they granted a religious exemption.duh

It doesn't matter their reasoning it wasn't rooted in the reality of THE LAW. Hence the 7-2 loss

It was overturned 7-2 at the Supreme Court. What don't you understand about that? The leftist states dragged catholic nuns through hell and then ultimately lost. They ought to be ashamed of themselves

The employees could've paid for their own birth control duh

In the case of the Catholic nuns the Democrat states lost 7-2 in the Supreme Court. I would submit its the democrats who do not understand the system and in fact use the process of a 10 or 15 year legal battle to intimidate people. The states have a deep pocket of money whereas the catholic nuns did not and instead get buried in legal fees. pretty disgusting

It's a pattern of behavior in the more radical element of the party that's been driving it for the past 15 ish years.

Look. There were many comments made during the Biden administration. Democrat states ie California targeted Catholic nuns with nonsensical lawsuits. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/amp/news/45095/little-sisters-have-big-win-in-supreme-court-decision I get you are hyper partisan but the track record of Democrats targeting Christians with lawfare is nothing new. Any reasonable people can look at the events over the past two Democrat administrations and come to the same conclusion as I did here. And to reiterate I'm merel reacting to my observations.

The fact you are trying to do whatever you are doing here knowing full well someone made an allegations which kicked off a criminal investigation shows what I'm dealing with. You appear to have no issue with the reputations that were ruined so that the New York Slimes could grab headlines like this one https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/22/us/southern-baptist-sex-abuse.html

The allegations ruined good people's reputations and destroyed their lives. Why do you defend that?

My evidence is a DROPPED criminal case against the leaders of the SBC who were falsely accused about covering up child sex abuse. Now that we know this wasn't true and was the basis for the DOJ opening investigation resulting in damage to reputation, there needs to be a FULL INVESTIGATION into this. This was provided in the first post. Duh

I'm here to understand OTHER POINTS OF VIEW. If the only thing you have to offer is yelling about "sources" when I've given you a source including the former President's SOTU that I've used to establish my POINT OF VIEW, your purpose is only to TROLL. Be honest the only source you'll accept are the ones I reject because they are already DEBUNKED.

If you aren't going to bother to educate yourself about this story, why participate in the discussion?

In this case they lied about senior leadership covering up child abuse and ran headliners in a variety of leftist media outlets like the Washington Post and the New York Times

Yeah right. The left wing and the RINOs like Liz Cheney decided to use the legal system to create a headline and try to lie to the masses for election purposes. Election interference and bordering on treasonous behavior. Just like this story where they knowingly allowed a LIE to fester in the public discourse for a few years. There's many stories like this and you act like it's not intentional

There were NO CHARGES..duh