West

Sorry but your post is not rooted in reality and what the Durham report refers to as "confirmation bias". Basically you have a theory and are trying to make the "evidence" fit said theory.

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2023/5/16/key-takeaways-from-investigation-of-fbis-trump-russia-probe The Durham report concluded "the FBI at the very least was too hasty in opening its investigation of Trump, saying the department at the time lacked “actual evidence” – including any proof of contact between Trump campaign staff and Russian intelligence agents – and instead relied on “raw, unanalysed and uncorroborated intelligence”. "investigators repeatedly fell victim to “confirmation bias”," "FBI’s failure to corroborate a single substantive allegation from a dossier that purported to show raw research related to the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia, amid other misdeeds." So basically what I said. Someone knowing a guy who knows a Russian does not equal collusion

Man you need to shut off CNN. Don't you find it dishonest that they took a 5 second audio clip out of its context and then spun a narrative? Sort of like what the news media did to the covington kids. Also, I correctly pointed out that any "interference" Russia did in 2016 was probably more to do with Clinton meddling in Eastern European politics than a direct connection to the Trump campaign.

Polling data can be used for alot of things including business marketing. Not everything is some wild ass conspiracy theory about some dude sipping Vodka trying to overthrow the US government. As the theory goes, three degrees of separation. Just cause someone knows a guy who knows Putin doesn't prove some wild ass conspiracy theory

He clearly doesn't understand how government works.

The FBI falls ultimately under the leadership of the President. You are A FOOL if you do not believe high ranking politicians ie THE PRESIDENT were not fully aware of a political campaign being monitored by their agencies.

Exactly. Manafort knew a guy who knew a Russian therefore "collusion".

Manafort shared readily available polling data with a person he knew from the business world. Not Russian intelligence. There's no evidence he knew the guy was Russian intelligence and was put up on paper work related charges not related to "collusion" so that Hillary Clinton could save face. The Democrats destroyed the reputation of Jeff Sessions for simply taking a meeting with the Russian ambassador to the United States in his role as us senator. Pretty vile Ironically Hillary Clinton's campaign finance manager's brother was also in business with Manafort and no doubt had the same business connections. Nice try

The Bush Republicans were the initial people who funded the oppo research from Christopher Steele which was the basis for the FISA warrant. They had every reason to sew suspicion because they were just as dirty as Obama. Clinton ended up having to pay a fine because they misrepresented (likely intentionally) to cover up from the fact they in part funded it.. Really the whole thing was pretty dumb. At that time, the US was trying to normalize relations with Russia. Hence that bizzare photo opp with the Obama administration and the "reset" button. Clinton as SOS was meddling in the affairs of Eastern Europe. Any "interference" was more than likely payback for America's meddling in Eastern Europe and had very little to do with Trump. Clinton and the Bush Republicans in the senate used it as a mechanism to sew discord and confusion leading up to the 2018 midterms. The goal? To keep the large scale grift going funding wars that Trump was trying to end. Hence the attacks on Musk and Doge

If it was independent justice the woke radicals implemented under Obama and Biden would resign

When you cross over from normal political discourse and debate to attempted sabotage and destruction of the oppositions family members, businesses, or personal property (i.e. decades long lawsuits which ultimately end in vindication but financial ruin or lengthy prison sentences by whacked out judges) you no longer live in a normal democracy but rather totalitarian state. At this point the US and Canada look more like China than they do a beacon of freedom

They were only trying to cover their own asses from their vile attempt to overthrow a sitting president. That's another pattern of behavior.

I agree. It's beyond absurd to keep believing the collusion lie at this point. Gone are the days where you debate about policy and legislate by consensus. The new brand of politics is stacking the deck with a radical judiciary who doesn't give a shit about the laws of the land and just makes decisions based on political ideology.

That's entirely a false narrative. And its not entirely irrelevant. Biden appointed hundreds of activist judges on his way out the door to harass an incoming Administration and his supporters, subverting the will of the voters and ultimately serving the same function as tying Trump up with the collusion delusion the first go around. It's a pattern of behavior

Democrats ie Maxine Waters are siding with domestic terrorists.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/1mdb-scandal-explained-a-tale-of-malaysias-missing-billions Goldman Sachs was tied up in this scandal as well.. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/1mdb-scandal-explained-a-tale-of-malaysias-missing-billions Goldman Sachs was tied up in this scandal as well.. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/1mdb-scandal-explained-a-tale-of-malaysias-missing-billions Goldman Sachs was tied up in this scandal as well..

He's just another Liberal Party clown. Also, his former firm Goldman Sachs got caught up in this scandal https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/25/1mdb-scandal-explained-a-tale-of-malaysias-missing-billions

Splitting hairs. I imagine you'd suggest differently if the Trump admin used questionable methods to get a secret warrant on their political adversaries.

Lol.. considering the Obama administration took questionable FISA warrants out on Trump I would say you are stretching

then why are US Senators and former state attorney generals basically saying the same thing? It's not my legal opinion dummy. I only REACT to what Senators (and former state attorney general) is saying

It's wild. Record number of inductions. Whacky judges thinking they can overstep and undermine the will of the voters.

The President issued a religious pardon which is in his purview to do. Instead of accepting the will of the people the Democrats did their "resist" bullshit and ended up harassing nuns by use of the legal system. Look I don't care what your opinions are on birth control. You shouldn't be imposing that on other people via LAWSUITS aka lawfare. It's pretty sick.

This is nonsense. Leftists have no problem using high priced lawyers to institutionally harass Christians. Their money would be spent on PAYING FOR THEIR OWN BIRTH CONTROL AND CONDOMS

You can decide. You just can't expect your Christian employer to be financially burdened by said decision if it violates religious conscience. Why the left continue to harass Christians is whacked.

https://readlion.com/in-religious-liberty-win-herzog-foundation-granted-injunction-in-case-over-biden-era-pregnancy-rule/?_hsenc=p2ANqtz-96tZrBBFQGt69GKzcf0DxQ4hzHyhMe0RvjGosZChYkwokuAhh740IDPWIWTdoj-n-o7Dw-F624LmvKfY95XpuTVya8Fw&_hsmi=352703150&fbclid=IwY2xjawJIMypleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcuRtg9zkFj3usMaa3RmKjMHXmUD_U48gXnsAeo-ZC0JQxFFxTt2B1oPOg_aem_jYU8eVjWlZTfg-XAmjujTA Here's another one.