TreeBeard

Cons certainly seem to have more trolls in comment sections than others.

Even some of the least wise among us can tell you that poor people not using condoms contributes to HIV infections. God keeps feeding these celibate old geezers false information.

Suddenly polls are a great indicator of voting intention after Con supporters have been setting their hair on fire about how unreliable and biased polls are. Partisan hacks with no capacity for shame?

People still believe that celibate old geezers are the spokesmen for God? Funny.

So the anomalies are always either male or female?

Hooray, the Cons have enough support never to win.

So, biological sex isn’t binary, since there are genetic anomalies, correct?

Even you could determine the sex 99% of the time. Are you now saying biological sex is never ambiguous? They’re always obviously male/female?

My link wasn’t a study. Try reading it. If there are only 2 options, even if the newborn doesn’t fit into either category, the nurse picks one. That’s completely meaningless. Biological sex might not even be apparent at birth in some of these outlier cases. You’re not a serious person. No one can say something that stupid with a straight face. No one said they aren’t rare cases. But those rare cases means biological sex isn’t binary.

The only way to combat this will be an auto pact with China.

That’s democracy.

The medical community doesn’t claim that biological sex is binary. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-why-human-sex-is-not-binary/ “The main problem with a strong dichotomy is that there are intermediate cases that push the limits and ask us to figure out exactly where the dividing line is between males and females,” says Arthur Arnold at the University of California, Los Angeles, who studies biological sex differences.

Hands only ever have 5 fingers. Except if they have a mutation where there are 6. You’re not equipped to even have a conversation if you can’t see that it’s contradictory to say biological sex is binary, except when it’s not.

These two statements are contradictory.

So sex isn’t binary. We agree. Unless you’re saying sex is binary, but these people are neither male nor female, nor any other sex. You would have to be an imbecile to hold that view.

And in the cases where they aren’t discernible?

So if there is ONLY male and female, which one are they?

The criteria s written down. Parties must meet 2 of the 3. The Bloc does, the Greens don’t. It’s not for no reason, obviously.

In this case, no. Apologies. The number is in the thousands, not the hundreds of thousands. Point remains the same though, even if it’s actually only 6,000. What sex is someone with both genitals? Male or female?

So you say biological sex is binary, and then you go on to explain how biological sex isn’t totally binary. I think partisan idiocy might be colouring your answer a bit there. There are good resources online for basic biology.

So what sex are people who have that condition?

No one says it’s common. But it’s not 1 per million, it’s 1.7%. In Canada, that means there are around 680,000 intersex people. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ It proves that 600,000+ people in Canada do not fall under the normal two sexes. You seem confused… Do you understand what I typed above about the exceptions to biological sex? It means that biological sex isn’t binary. You even said there are rare exceptions.

You’re denying that there are cases where someone is born with both male and female genitalia, for instance?