Jump to content

BeaverFever

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Everything posted by BeaverFever

  1. Translation: most people, including many self-described conservatives believe in something called “rights” rather than simply only caring for themselves and their own personal circumstances . So even though a person may never need an abortion it’s very natural for them to support those who do. In addition unlike the right the left understands that lesbians like all women can and do get pregnant, can do get sexually assaulted, can and do get abortions if the pregnancy is unviable or unwanted. Translation: the right very rarely thinks for itself. Overturning abortion rights is a cause the right has committed to and the very fact that the right has committed to it is proof enough for many of their followers that the cause is just and should be defended to the death. Abortion bans fail every time they’re put to a popular vote even in red states but since Republican party leadership has made a deal with the religious right to include this in their agenda, a large number of mindless Republicans who previously couldn’t have cared less about abortion now parrot the new party line. Thirdly unlike the right, the left believes in women’s rights and correctly understood this is a woman’s rights issue which is absolutely correct. It is an established fact in every country that embryos and fetuses don’t have rights and anti-abortionists don’t intend to consider fetuses as humans with rights for any other purpose EXCEPT abortion. Many on the right support in anti-abortion to the point of idiocy, wanting to ban IVF treatments, morning after pills birth control, reciting absurd lies like claiming it’s biologically impossible for a rape victim to become pregnant, or believe that women and even raped children should be forced to carry life-threatening pregnancies to term even if the fetus is determined to be non-viable. But because they can’t understand that and are simply repeating the idea that this is only about fetuses’s rights without comprehending the issue in the slightest they tuen to anger, violence and emotion rather than logic or reason. And let’s be clear on that last point: it’s anti-abortionists who have been doing the bombings and the shootings and the death threats and the violence, not the other way around. Anti-abortionists apply zero logic and reason, which is anathema to religious beliefs.
  2. Hilarious lies and revisionism. The way you describe People flagrantly breaking laws or engaging in serious impropriety simpl as innocent people and for some reason republicans suddenly think it’s important to mention if they’re black as if that somehow makes them innocent. If a Republican shot a baby in the face in broad daylight, you’d be the first to claim that he’s being arrested simply for expressing an opinion the left didn’t like. Your dishonesty is truly disgusting Trump famously smeared a gold star family and his people strong-armed their way through Arlington cemetery staff so they could use the cemetery as a political prop contrary to cemetery property Meanwhile the “gold star mom” you cite committed serious felonies when she abused her office to helped unauthorized conspiracy kooks access election records and copy hard drives of voting machines. She was already a local scandal-plagued kook before she decided to graduate to serious crimes is a multiple felon and election conspiracy nut who deserves her 4 felony and 7 misdemeanour convictions The law-breaking anti abortion activists, election and Jan 6 rioters got what they deserved and Republicans are the last people on earth who object to police arresting or killing black people who are breaking the law Michael Flynn took tens of thousands from the Russians and even visited Russian military intelligence headquarters Rudi Giuliani is a bottom-feeding disgraced nutjob who has been disbarred in multiple states for his lies and dishonourable conduct during Trumps failed attempt to steal the 2020 election he bankrupted himself when decided to commit falsely defame innocent citizens who were honestly and faithfully fulfilling their legal duties He also has a host of other unpaid debts and lawsuits, continues to spend on himself lavishly recklessly and he was criticized in court his poor and disorganized financial records
  3. 1) Dumbass User is the one who said “Hispanic” is an ethnicity 2) You don’t have to be a genetic mixture of European and indigenous to be “Hispanic”.
  4. LOL You don’t know WTF you are talking about. THEY ARE ETHNICITIES. For example there is distinct Mexican culture, food, dialect, traditions and genetic composition compared to Puerto Rico. All of these Spanish speaking countries in Latin and South America are different. There is no such thing as a “Hispanic” ethnicity. That’s an umbrella term used to describe a social class in USA or as shorthand when people want to refer to multiple ethnicities. It’s like saying “Eastern European” or “South Asian” or “Middle Eastern”. Nobody is saying Latin American is a “race” you dumbass know-nothing So what if white people can be Puerto Rican in your mind that means it’s not racist to call Puerto Ricans “trash”? And your claim that when he called Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage” he was only talking about the land and not the people on it is ridiculously absurd. It’s also refuted by his immediately present diatribe about how ”those Latinos” make a lot of babies because they just “come inside” just like they do to America. I am not defending rapists just because I refuse to support Trump’s fascist mass detention schemes. Only a batshit republican such as yourself would think that way. You republicans never change. 20 years ago you folks were claiming anyone who doesn’t believe Bush-Cheney lies about Saddam Hussein and the Iraq invasion supports terrorists and 9/11. Before that it was anyone who didn’t support the latest Republican scandal like Iran Contra or McCarthy witch hunts were communists.
  5. Puerto Rican and Mexican are ethnicities, genius. “Racist” includes derogatory treatment of races or ethnic groups. Logically it follows that calling Puerto Rico “a floating island of garbage” is derogatory to Puerto Ricans especially since he continues to negatively describe latinos and suggest they breed uncontrollably The only people defending rapists are republicans whose leader has a actually been found responsible for rape and whose former speaker of the house during the Clinton years admitted to being a lifelong pedophile. The list of Republican perverts and sex offenders over the years is quite long, you don’t want to go there. Your continued dishonest characterization of Latin Americans as rapists just proves your party is full of POS racists so probably not a good choice open up your marquee event with a shock comic that caters to this element.
  6. Except George Lopez actually IS Mexican and joking that Mexicans might steal border wall construction material is different from a white guy calling Puerto Ricans “garbage” who breed indiscriminately. Hinchcliffe is a roast comic and his jokes are meant to be shocking and offensive and there’s nothing wrong with that style of comedy ….but a dumb move by Republicans to decide to that is what they want to present to the American people right before an election, especially since they’re already known as the party spewing racist vitriol about latinos being rapists and criminals Trump’s day of hate
  7. So? I didn’t say anything that contradicted that.
  8. He used his influence to get a lot of things for a lot of people, thats how powerful people go about things on politics and even often in the business world. For Republicans also. You put “your people” on the chess board, the more chess pieces you have on the board the more powerful you are. It’s called cronyism, the US particularly notorious for it and you don’t have to look to far to find republicans doing the same thing, it’s how the game is played https://whyy.org/articles/top-pa-senator-appoints-colleagues-wife-to-lucrative-gaming-control-board-seat/amp/ https://www.gq.com/story/republican-party-nepotism https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-also-pay-family-public-dollars-699548
  9. No, the blow job Trump gave to Putin in Helsinki cannot be topped by anyone. Trump has zero charm, his mail-order brides including the current one never loved him and can’t stand even being in his presence, their relationships were purely transactional just like his encounter with Stormy Daniels. Merkel of all people particularly despised Trump
  10. What’s dead wrong exactly?
  11. They held a rally in MSG 85 years ago also Listening to Trumps own words read in German you can see the similarities
  12. “Obamacare will require government death panels” Jewish space lasers The government controls hurricanes Kovid Konspiracy Kooks Trump knows more about the military than Americas generals Trump knows as much about microbiology and virology as CDC scientists Zelenskyy is a Jewish nazi Biden will make the stock market crash Record high stock markets under Biden are irrelevant because stock markets don’t matter Trump holding up a hurricane map in national press conference where he had taken a black magic marker to try and redraw draw a different path for the hurricane because he couldn’t admit his tweet had a small error Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11 Saddam Hussein had WMD that could hit the USA within 45 minutes Iraqis will greet invading US troops as liberators and the war will be over in less than 6 months with hardly any US or civilian casualties
  13. Putin has the MAGAs by their tiny balls. Every time you look at who they’re sneaking around with, it’s another Putin operative or in this case Putin himself. Wall Street journal is an established conservative pro-Republican outlet You really think they would just invent this out of thin air?
  14. Elon Musk has been in regular contact with Putin for two years, says report Alleged talks between billionaire and Russian president could have enormous security implications Elon Musk, the world’s richest man who is now central to Donald Trump’s election campaign, has been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin for the past two years, according to a report in the US. The Wall Street Journal, citing several in-post and former US, European and Russian officials, reported that the conversations between the two men ranged from the personal to the geopolitical and included a request from the Russian leader not to activate his Starlink satellite internet service over Taiwan as a favour to the Chinese leader and Putin ally, Xi Jinping. The implications of a secret channel of communication between Musk and Putin are enormous for western security. The Tesla tycoon is a key player in the US space programme and has a high-level security clearance. His company SpaceXlaunches US national security satellites, his Starlink satellite communications system is critical to the war in Ukraine, and he runs one of the world’s biggest and most influential social media platforms, X, which has provided a vehicle for Russian disinformation campaigns. Furthermore, if Trump is elected on 5 November, Musk could play an important part in a new US administration. He has poured his own money into the campaign and made multiple personal appearances at rallies. Trump has suggested Musk could head a government commission on efficiency if he wins. “This is a story about oligarch capture of the US,” said Fiona Hill, who was the senior director for European and Russian affairs in the Trump White House. She compared the situation in the US now to the heyday of oligarchs in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union. “If people like Musk get Trump re-elected, they’ll expect all kinds of regulatory gifts in their favour,” said Hill, who is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, the chancellor of Durham University and a defence adviser to the UK government. She added: “He is in a position to command government contracts, potentially with a government position, and there are loads of militaries around the world dependent on his systems, not least Ukraine.” Earlier this month, the journalist Bob Woodard reported in his new book that Trump himself has had as many as seven private phone calls with Putin since leaving office. Trump has said he will not comment on the reporting but that if he had spoken with Putin it would have been “a smart thing”. The Wall Street Journal report said the extent of Musk’s contacts with Putin was a closely held secret and even some officials in the Biden White House had been unaware of them. … https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/oct/25/elon-musk-has-been-in-regular-contact-with-putin-for-two-years-say-reports
  15. LMAO! What bullshit! When I post an article that directly contradicts or disproves your BS, you just make up that it has “nothing to do with the subject”. Like when you said an article tiled “Debunked 2000 mules video contains no evidence” was actually trying to tell readers the video had compelling evidence. Can you even explain how 2 articles about the people who attended the Harris event had “nothing to do with” the Harris event? Your entire defence is “oh you’re presenting evidence and providing links that’s a tell that you’re losing”. You’re a bullshitter, you make claims without even trying to offer a shred of proof, you hate being proven wrong, and when an extensive proof is literally copy-pasted in your face you resort to this lame defence mechanism. I didn’t post the entire article, only the relevant section. And we both know if I just put the link you wouldn’t click it and read through the whole thing. Pretty hilarious considering all the bullshitting you do. As Ive said elsewhere, other right wingers e bad for mindlessly parroting fake news and propaganda but you’re the worst on this site for cooking up pure homemade bullshit in your own head. Lol those are fake customers. The restaurant is closed to the public. The “customers” are supporters. Nowhere before or after did Trump or anyone n his campaign communicate that it a staged event or that the people getting food were hand-picked staff and supporters. He didn’t communicate anything about it being a staged event. He says he “worked a shift”. Other than the sign on the door I don’t think they even communicated that the McDonalds would be closed. Just like his deepfake Taylor Swift photos it was done with a straight face neither confirming nor denying if it was real or not. It was people on social media who exposed it as fake not Trump. She didn’t drop in unannounced and kick out patrons. She booked the restaurant for a private function, the restaurant had a sign on the door informing people that they would be closing early for a private function and staff told patrons in advance as well. Same as Trump. I already gave you the link to Trump’s own website where he has an entire page dedicated his fake McDonalds stunt and nowhere doe he give any indication that it’s staged. See? That’s a perfect example of where I gave evidence that directly contradicts your claim and you just say it has “nothing to do with” the topic. The scripted staged event is common in politics. Both sides do it and have done it. Politicians don’t just “pop in” places interact with random members of the public and let whatever happens happen….not when they’re spend tens of thousands to film it for public consumption. No there you go bullshitting again. Doesn’t it bother you to be such a bullshitter? That was only after it started leaking on social media. At first it was “Trump works shift at McDonalds” especially in conservative news outlets as noted in the links below, both of which refer to him serving customers and reporters, Fox even describing him serving a “surprised customer” https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-makes-fries-pennsylvania-mcdonalds-ive-now-worked-15-minutes-more-than-kamala.amp https://www.newsmax.com/amp/us/trump-kamala-harris/2024/10/20/id/1184801/ I would provide you with even more links to prove these aren’t one-offs but then you would just complain again. I’d love to hear how it has “nothing to do with “ the topic
  16. LOL see just as I mentioned earlier you complain that other people’s posts are too long because you have a short attention span and you hate it when people show you evidence. That’s your MO: demand the other person provide evidence and when they do complain the the evidence is somehow proof they’re “full of crap” Just because you’re a constant bullshitter who never offers a shred of evidence for any of your made up claims doesn’t mean the rest of us have to sink to your level. Im sorry that you have problems reading and paying attention but ill continue to provide proof even though I know you’ll continue to deny reality. How is that any different from Trump’s McD’s stunt? Where are the names of the people who pretended to be his customers? Where did Trump says “hey check out my fake staged McDonalds stunt! “ Exactly what is the difference between Trump’s stunt and Kamalas. ? Be specific. Other than the fact that Kamala went to a popular, classy local favourite while Trump went to a cheap greasy fast food chain that had an e.coli outbreak days later there is no difference. There is ZERO evidence that Kamala used any paid actors and why would they when they could just bring in local Dem party members and supporters for free?. For that matter where’s the evidence that the source is an “external Kamala friendly reporter,” is that just more of your made up BS?
  17. Trump is such a narcissist his phone wallpaper is literally a picture of himself. Photo at link. Donald Trump’s iPhone Wallpaper Is Just a Photo of Himself https://gizmodo.com/donald-trumps-iphone-wallpaper-is-just-a-photo-of-himself-2000515029
  18. Nice backpedal attempt. Your exact words were: “Republicans complain when Democrats fake events. When they hire actors to pretend that their regular people and that they're genuinely surprised and happy to see the candidate when in fact they're just actors.” Nowhere did you say “Republicans complain when anyone including Republicans fake events” or “Republicans complain when anyone fakes events but only if it’s in 2024 and onwards before then it was totally cool”. And BTW Trumps not the only one. How about this single childless republican posing with a fake family? Child-free Republican candidate Anderson runs for Congress with fake family album 1) You have no idea what she or her campaign has said because you rely on right wing media to filter and interpret information for you and of they don’t pass things along that contradict their lies. 2) They were not paid actors Ryan Deto, a reporter for the western Pennsylvania publication TribLIVE.com, who was at the restaurant that day, told us in an email, "The people inside the restaurant were campaign volunteers who were there to meet with Harris, Walz and their spouses." He added he believed this campaign-volunteer aspect was "evident" to him upon his and the rest of the press pool's arrival at the restaurant, which occurred in the white vans mentioned in posts promoting the rumor. https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/08/22/harris-restaurant-paid-actors/ Dispel those rumors: Jefferson Hills couple recount meeting Harris and Walz at Moon campaign bus tour Retired public school teachers and active Democrats Judy and Ed Manfredi of Jefferson Hills said they had a wonderful opportunity to meet Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, her running mate this November, when they stopped at the Primanti Bros. restaurant in Moon on Aug. 18. Just please don’t call them actors…. … When Snopes staff did its research, it reported that it has “yet to find any credible evidence of involvement from “paid actors.” The Manfredis found out about the Primanti’s stop, part of a campaign bus tour leading up to last week’s Democratic National Convention, by reaching out to some party leaders a few days before the candidates’ announced arrival at Pittsburgh International Airport. Judy is the Jefferson Hills Democratic Committee chair, and both Manfredis serve as Democratic committee members for District 3 in the borough….. https://www.unionprogress.com/2024/08/27/dispel-those-rumors-jefferson-hills-couple-recount-meeting-harris-and-walz-at-moon-campaign-bus-tour/ Show me where the Trump campaign ever promoted it as such. Every news story said he was going to cook and serve fries, nowhere mentioning fake customers or staged event. Even the OP says he “worked a shift”. So does trump’s website : https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/b971ff07-cb51-48e8-9ab5-cb9c120791b0 FOR THE HUNDREDTH TIME STOP MAKING SHIT UP Wait earlier in the same post you just finished saying he campaign refuses to talk about it at all: now practically in the same breath you’re claiming they’re constantly telling a new story about it? STOP MAKING SHIT UP
  19. Yeah 2 months later, after all his efforts failed and the day after an assault on the Capitol attempted to prevent certification on the date required by the constitution. Your take away from all that is that he won’t try again? That’s like saying if someone shoots at you misses, it means they won’t try to shoot at you again. In 2020 they came up with all these schemes at the last minute. This time his people have been planning this for 4 years now. You’d be the first. We’ll see. No you’re mistaken. 1)The vote in Florida was so close the Florida law required a mandatory recount and no winner was declared 2) Because the method of recounting isn’t specified in law the state of Florida under Jeb Bush decided to only machine recount and a quarter the districts didn’t even do it 3) Gore exercised his right under Florida law to request manual recounts in districts of his choice The is explicitly provided for in Florida law, so the fact you would say this is same or worse than Trump’s many 2020 lies scams and steal attempt is ridiculous 4) Gore’s requested recount was not completed because federal law also required counts to be completed by a specified date so Florida stopped the manual recount at a specified deadline even though it wasn’t complete. Florida had the power to grant extensions but chose not to 5)In 5-4 split decision USSC ruled Florida can recount in any which way it pleases and doesn’t need to follow a mutually agreed upon method…so ONLY THEN DID BUSH WIN AND GORE IMMEDIATELY CONCEDED The FOLLOWING DAY 6) It was Bush, not Gore who appealed to the USSC after Gore won at the state supreme court. It’s absolutely unfathomable that you can compare this to Trump’s baseless junk lawsuits that were so bad they thrown out dozens of times over and the lawyers who prepared them faced professional discipline 7) A post election analysis revealed that Gore still would have lost had his requested manual recount proceeded but WOULD have won had the entire state been manually recounted, which he never asked for The issue with dimpled and hanging chads was also not as simple as you suggest as different counties counted them differently and some counties changed the rules repeatedly during the vote counting and recounting The irony here is that Republicans today are screaming for what Gore had wanted method: manual counting and scrutinizing the postmarks on mail-in ballots But to summarize you’re trying to push a false narrative that Bush won Florida decisively and Gore was trying to sabotage it with baseless specious lawsuits like Trump but the fact that lower courts sided with him and the USSC’s split decision proves otherwise FFS you’re not reading. You keep misrepresenting what I said are doing this purpose or are you just slow to catch on? I have said REPEATEDLY now that even if Gore had won the court case he would have still lost the election because the districts where he asked to recount weren’t enough to change the outcome. How can I get this through your thick skull?? Why is that not sticking with you? 1) I fail to see your point as we’re not talking about faithless electors here 2) That decision is specific to the laws in Washington State, every state has its own rules. 1) There’s no federal law requiring that a state appoint the electors of the candidate who got the most votes. If a given state has a state law, Im sure in this scenario the governor and his colleagues in the house and senate will amend it accordingly in an emergency session with all proper due process followed Sure some citizens will file lawsuits and so one but those take time, it’s not clear if they would win especially with a Trump Supreme Court in power and even if they did somehow win it’s unlikely that the remedy would be to remove the sitting president and replace him with the other candidate. Obviously this is something that would only be useful or feasible in a swing state where there is already a substantial Trump base to begin with and the politicians have calculated that they can survive politically by catering to this base. I don’t know why you keep using this silly “king” language These are the tricks he already tried to pull to win swing states where he lost or at least delegitimize his opponent’s presidency in the eyes of the American electorate, and he will try to do it again. The “king” metaphor you’re using doesn’t even make sense as that refers to how someone rules not how they gain office. No because he failed that time, which doesn’t guarantee that he’ll fail every time especially now that this time he and his minions have had 4 years to refine and prepare. He only has to stop Harris from getting 270 electoral votes to get the presidency and he can still do irreparable damage to the country just by trying even if he’s unsuccessful
  20. LMAO YOUR DISHONESTY AND SELECTIVE MEMORY IS WHAT IS STUNNING 1) Donald trump announced his candidacy in 2015 to a crowd of cheering paid actors,in case you conveniently forgot. Seriously it’s like you people have one of the memory eraser sticks from the “men in black” movie 2) Kamala didn’t hire actors. They were party volunteers, supporters, their friends and family, etc same as Trump’s staged McDonalds event.
  21. LMAO Is that a joke? He did everything that was described in the OP last time, just not as well as he didn’t have 4 years to plan it lkke he will this time
  22. It’s not just blind guessing. Predictions are informed by what actually happened in the past and continues to happen in present Not believing Trump would be a first for any Trump supporter. If you’ve managed to believe him up to now you’re probably never going to disbelieve him in the future. At the very least in will incite his followers and opportunistic republicans to cause more chaos and obstruction Lol no way! Ridiculous Trump has convinced nearly half the population to believe the country is run by a secret cabal amd the elections are fixed. Another republican lie. He did not try to have all military ballots thrown out. He tried to have mail-in absentee ballots that were postmarked after the deadline or missing a postmark thrown out, as per Florida law. Something Republicans would especially support now given their mail-in voting lies which will feature prominently again in their 2024 election lies. So did Bush. That was the whole crux of the lawsuit, Gore stating that the president’s brother Jeb shouldn’t get to unilaterally pick and chose a recount districts that benefit his brother. And Bush got his way the Supreme Court says it’s the state’s prerogative to selectively recount in whatever way they want for whatever reason they want. So again it’s dishonest of you to suggest Gore was up to something sneaky And neither of the 2 items you mentioned above are worse than Trump’s assault on democracy which not only sought to install him as President via undemocratic means based on fabricated lies, forged documents and secretly pressuring officials, but also attempting to discredit the entire election system and US democracy with his claims that they system is rigged from top to bottom by a secret shadowy cabal. No as point of fact I didn’t, not even once much less repeatedly. I just told you what I said. Go back and read that thread if you don’t believe me. As a side note if you don’t know the difference between would and should then you need to consult a dictionary. But the only time I ever said “would have won” is when I said ‘if the entire state had been recounted, which Gore didn’t request. ‘ I’ll explain it again: it is not against the law. States can certify anyone they choose they are not required to follow the vote count results that is just a norm and custom not a law. Of course they will have to explain why and so they will just cite the lies that Trump and republicans will be putting out about illegals voting, 2000 mules, mail-in ballot fraud, etc. Remember I said republicans have been planting election deniers and even some of their 2020 fake electors in county election offices for years now Some of the sources they will cite will be those people. Let me play it out for you GOVERNOR: “Dear citizens of the Great State of x, it is with great regret that we have learned the election in our fine state has been stolen, as but one example here is Bubba Gump, the election official from lower Butfuk County: BUBBA: “A-yep I done see’d me a fraud! I seen it reel good heh heh” GOVERNOR: “Due to this disturbing and irrefutable news, which we continue to learn more about every day, we cannot confirm the integrity of the vote. We will share the unsettling evidence with the public sometime in the future , in the meantime I have asked the state legislature to nominate and certify for Congress our state’s electors, ensuring that the will of the people of State X is not circumvented. Let me assure that that if the Republican majority elects Republican electors its just a pure coincidence, nothing more as our fine members of the legislature would never do anything unethical. “
  23. Republicans complain when Dems stage events and reject any argument that “both sides do it”. The. Republicans stage an event and say “both sides do it”
  24. 1) It is not almost certain that Trump bows out if he clearly loses. On fact that is highly unlikely 2) What about one of the most plausible scenarios, a close election that he barely loses where there are no clear issues or grounds for a challenge? Of course he will falsely allege there are issues and you will believe him. It’s almost certain that in either case he will claim fraud and whip out his new and improved 2020 election lie playbook 1) Pressuring election officials, state and federal legislators, forging fake electoral certificates, filing dozens of baseless junk lawsuits with fabricated and false claims as Trump did in 2020 and will likely do again in 2024 is not anything remotely comparable to Bush v Gore dispute over how a mandatory recount should be conducted 2) I didn’t say Gore “should have” won. In fact pointed out that if the recount had happened in the districts Gore had proposed he still would have lost. However I point out a simple fact that a state-wide recount, which he didn’t request, would have resulted in a Gore win. If he convinces swing states to certify his electors regardless on the actual vote count he could become president. As I said failing that he still will commit these acts just to cause as much damage to a Harris presidency as possible by causing a half of the population to falsely believe Kamala stole the election. Yeah exactly and MAGAs have been grooming, cultivating, and placing people at all levels of government for 4 years now. I will say it again: if it’s so far fetched for him to do exactly what he did last time the. put your money where your mouth is. When was she ever a middle class housewife?
  25. On election night he will declare himself the winner regardless of the vote count. Do you deny it? Do you honestly believe he will not do exactly what he did in the past, like he learned his lesson last time and is sorry and promises to never do it again? He and his minions are already spreading 2024 rigged election conspiracies. Amd they’ve already placed 2020 election deniers and some of his 2020 fake electors in key positions. You think that’s all because they plan to concede on election night if they don’t win? I didn’t say he would declare himself king. If he doesn’t win he will do everything to make people believe the election results are illegitimate and Kamala Harris is an illegitimate president, regardless of whether that results in Trump being named president or not. Conspiracy-fuelled constitutional crises, insurrections, government obstruction etc that plague the Harris presidency would be a suitable consolation prize because Trump’s fragile ego can’t admit that he’s not god-like perfection incarnate And it doesn’t require “everybody” to go along with it, just enough people in the right places Again I challenge any one of you MAGAs to put your money where your mouth is. Join me in a bet. Is every one of you a coward?
×
×
  • Create New...