Legato

That bump must be more severe than I first thought, try two Tylenol with your Gerber mealtime.

Banged your head on the door again? Take a Tylenol and come back when you can make smidgen of non-childish sense.

So Mr. Brimfullodim. Be like herbie he thinks EV's run on Dragonfruit, as you know they are powered by a mixture of Robford and Carney mushroom dregs. Batteries not included.

Early Years: The government recorded balanced budgets from 2005–06 to 2007–08, paying down over $37 billion in federal debt. Recession and Stimulus: Following the 2008 recession, the government ran consecutive deficits to fund Canada's Economic Action Plan. Return to Balance: By the 2015 budget, the Harper government projected a return to a balanced budget, largely achieved through fiscal restraint, selling GM shares, and using contingency funds. Debt-to-GDP: Despite recession-related deficits, the government maintained the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio in the G7. Tax Policy: The government implemented a "low-tax plan," reducing the GST and corporate taxes while focusing on returning to a balanced, or slightly surplus, position by 2015.

Eyes and ears, one would presume you have them and have an inkling of knowledge in their use.

Try reading, it does help.... "You are correct about the motion which became moot" .

No, federal Conservatives did not vote to give Bell Media $40$ -million. In February 2024, Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge stated that the independent regulatory body, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), decided to provide roughly $40$-million in annual "regulatory relief" to Bell. This was not a legislative vote by political parties. Context: The CRTC, not parliament, made this decision, according to the Globe and Mail article. The Issue: The relief was meant to support local news, which Bell failed to maintain, leading to criticism from the government. CRTC Role: The CRTC regulates broadcasting and, as described by Wikipedia, sets conditions for funding, Wikipedia mentions. You are correct about the motion which became moot.

I remember some of the BBC radio shows. The Goon Show Dick Barton - Special Agent The Archers. Then along came TV and The Benny Hill Show.

Now show us the dark side.

The editorial staff are conditioned to favour the owners wishes. The all put their mouths where the money wants them to be. Tell Bell media to give the 40 million back.

If you cant see the obviosity of the Liberal bias then no amount of archived footage would ever be enough. I watch a little of all the "news" channels, CBC, CTV, Global, all show a Liberal bias. Given your extreme left slant you see CBC CTV etc as far right. Anything controlled By Bell Media favours the Liberals. Who wouldn't if your prize is $40 million.

Who are?

Those elites you speak of, who are they and why do you perceive them as being elites.

Yes it entered my head through daily observations. What's your inexcusable excuse.

Seems like your practicing is not paying off. Did you attend a law course at the "Wheel Tappers and Shunters Social Club".

A good name would be "Notoronto".

Accusing someone/thing of lying and using a lie in the accusation is probably one the dumbest expressions available. Elevate yourself and re-join humanity.

Well Mr. Shut eye there apparently is a strong left bias, welcomed by the left wing group think and it's well known. Just because you are so far left everything right of Cassiopeia is far right.

Which has to do with the concept of a biased media...what? Gentlemen Start Your Goalposts.

Meanwhile do try to make sense and garner some intuitive insight into the workings of the common man.

Lockstep with the Carney Liberals, gushing praise and numerous complimentary fluff pieces. Last year CTV had an exaggerated positive Carney article on their website and 5 derogatory articles on Poilievre on the same day. Just another Bell Media Liberal shill outlet.

You do know what thought did..... Imagination is way ahead of your false reality.