Legato

Try reading, it does help.... "You are correct about the motion which became moot" .

No, federal Conservatives did not vote to give Bell Media $40$ -million. In February 2024, Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge stated that the independent regulatory body, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), decided to provide roughly $40$-million in annual "regulatory relief" to Bell. This was not a legislative vote by political parties. Context: The CRTC, not parliament, made this decision, according to the Globe and Mail article. The Issue: The relief was meant to support local news, which Bell failed to maintain, leading to criticism from the government. CRTC Role: The CRTC regulates broadcasting and, as described by Wikipedia, sets conditions for funding, Wikipedia mentions. You are correct about the motion which became moot.

I remember some of the BBC radio shows. The Goon Show Dick Barton - Special Agent The Archers. Then along came TV and The Benny Hill Show.

Now show us the dark side.

The editorial staff are conditioned to favour the owners wishes. The all put their mouths where the money wants them to be. Tell Bell media to give the 40 million back.

If you cant see the obviosity of the Liberal bias then no amount of archived footage would ever be enough. I watch a little of all the "news" channels, CBC, CTV, Global, all show a Liberal bias. Given your extreme left slant you see CBC CTV etc as far right. Anything controlled By Bell Media favours the Liberals. Who wouldn't if your prize is $40 million.

Who are?

Those elites you speak of, who are they and why do you perceive them as being elites.

Yes it entered my head through daily observations. What's your inexcusable excuse.

Seems like your practicing is not paying off. Did you attend a law course at the "Wheel Tappers and Shunters Social Club".

A good name would be "Notoronto".

Accusing someone/thing of lying and using a lie in the accusation is probably one the dumbest expressions available. Elevate yourself and re-join humanity.

Well Mr. Shut eye there apparently is a strong left bias, welcomed by the left wing group think and it's well known. Just because you are so far left everything right of Cassiopeia is far right.

Which has to do with the concept of a biased media...what? Gentlemen Start Your Goalposts.

Meanwhile do try to make sense and garner some intuitive insight into the workings of the common man.

Lockstep with the Carney Liberals, gushing praise and numerous complimentary fluff pieces. Last year CTV had an exaggerated positive Carney article on their website and 5 derogatory articles on Poilievre on the same day. Just another Bell Media Liberal shill outlet.

You do know what thought did..... Imagination is way ahead of your false reality.

The SCC provided a road map for legal separation in a 1998 reference .[5] Following the case, the federal government enacted a law in 2000 to provide “clarity” for how the federal government would approach a future independence referendum.[6] Details here.... https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/a-long-and-uncertain-road-to-alberta-independence/?print=print#:~:text=The SCC provided a road,approach a future independence referendum.

Maybe although Canada is not proud of you.

Good idea, would be nice to see the CBC, CTV, Global in full melt down mode, along with some on this board.

I see. Not that the fact a proof is not proven without proving the proof. Did you ever listen to the Goon Show? It was really funny. Mind you those without a sense of humour would probably be scratching their balls in frustration.

Not one of them has any degree of common sense, Thanks for proving my point.

Again what a terrible display of nonsensical blubbering. Try some maple syrup on your pacifier. Wot piont are you triing to make ear.