Infidel Dog

Well, as long as we're calling names, if you're supporting Rachel in supporting puberty blocking drugs and snipping breasts or penises or what he/she calls "gender affirming care" you're a psycho weirdo. BTW where did you get the idea that all Trans are homosexuals? Actually there's a movement now by actual homosexuals to have the T removed from LGBTQ. Those lesbians and homosexuals no longer want to be associated with them.

And now he/she is like, "Uncle Sam wants you! (kiddies to snip and clip, take puberty blockers and go trans.)" He's a groomer. That's radical.

No. He didn't invent it, but he did invent Levine as an Admiral in it. Levine didn't work his way up through the ranks of Public Health Service Commission. The wokeists behind the Biden regime had him slipped through Senate hearings as Assistant Secretary of Health then 7 months later it was like whoever's in charge of the Biden regime said, "Hey Rachel, how'd like to drive the traditionalists even more crazy," and poof he/she's an Admiral.

Speaking of "radical" though... Did you hear Biden made that freak Levine some sort of special Admiral? That's not just radical, it's an insult to real admirals. I thought opening the border to 5 million invaders was kind of radical. As is the new "woke" military. More affirmative action, minority generals. More women. More trannies. I can see China quaking in its boots. The radical over reaction to the pandemic stopped being understandable at a point and started to look more like a radical attempt to see how far they could go to reshape society. The data trickled out showing they were making mistakes and they didn't just ignore it, they censored it. That was radical. Government working with social media to censor news that might favor the opposition was radical. Illegal even. There's more radical, globalist-left, crazy-think, of course but that's enough to make the point. I'd love to tell you why pushing global warming as an existential threat is radical politics not science but off we'd go down that rabbit hole with the climate cultists who want to call all heretics to their new religion "deniers."

This came out today: Biden to Sell More Oil From Strategic Reserve After Draining It to 40-Year Low

Actually this is the first time I've seen the one you tell me you've shared with Legato. This one: It pretty much shows what I said. Except when you go way back like that what you see is oil production rising during Obama's term from the cellar he found them in to the peak levels of the 70s. The dip from the continuous rise in 2020 was when Biden took over and shut everything down. And here's why (from EIA): "Historically, crude oil production had been declining in the US in the 80s and 90s, but began a precipitous rise in 2010-2018 due to new methods in extracting oil like hydraulic fracturing." But it rose to new levels during Trump. And rose even further due to Trump deregulation and opening of previously closed lands. When Biden took over it was confusing where he stood on Fracking but he wrote down there would be no new fracking. Recently he's come out for and said he never was against it. So that's what the little downturn then return is to the peak he inherited is about. Trump did not inherit a peak from Obama. He inherited a rise to an old 70s peak due to oil companies adoption of fracking techniques. And don't tell me to ignore my lying eyes about the Saudis flooding the market with oil going into the pandemic, and Biden having to open the strategic oil reserves because of shortages, and beg cap in hand to Arabia and Venezuela for more oil from them. WE know he did that and we know Trump didn't because we saw it happen or not happen. You can debate wonky little data bites and bafflegab it until the cows come home, we saw that happen and we remember when oil was cheap during the Trump years and we notice that it isn't today.

What you describe can be seen on Legato's chart. But no, it does not show Trump inheriting any kind of rise in oil production from Obama like Biden inherited from Trump. I do remember what happened in 2020. The Saudi's had been engaged in a price war with Russian and had been flooding the market. This went into the pandemic and left the world with a glut in oil. The idea energy independence during the Trump years doesn't matter is wordplay bafflegab. Yes, energy independence simply means more exporting and the importing. An online progressive fact check will tell you therefore it doesn't actually matter. In reality why aren't we still doing it? Joe had to go into the strategic oil reserves. Trump didn't. Biden had to go to the Saudi's cap in hand begging for an oil production increase. Trump didn't. Towards the end he was trying to get them to cut back. Trump cut regulations and opened reserved lands. Oil production increased. That was not left over magic from the Obama years. The moment Joe took power he put a stop to all Trump energy policies. Oil prices rose. Production took an immediate dump but now it is rising again approaching Trump levels. Things rise and fall in steps. They rose drastically during the Trump years took a small dump when Biden took power and currently they are leveling high where Trump put them. Much as a drastic rise in global temperatures happened during the 1998 Super El Nino then temperatures leveled high and still are. It happens. But as Nationalist said prices are still higher than what they were during the Trump years. That's what people see and no amount of Proggish bafflegab will make them stop seeing it.

It's not necessary to prove the 2020 election was fraudulent to offer overwhelming evidence it was rigged. Absolute proof of fraud may not even be possible since the Progressives have hijacked legislative structure. But yeah, Zuckerbucks, pandemic lawfare changing election law, collusion between government and social media etc. It was rigged. Was it also fraudulent. Probably, but the courts will never allow that to be proven. See the Arizona mid-terms for support of that one. That one's not over yet but it's doubtful the cheated candidates of Arizona will ever get a fair trial.

Yes and the neocons were originally Liberals. People sometimes forget.

Not sure what you're talking about. Are you talking about your link where they talk about how oil profits are up? Profits and production are not the same thing. The price of oil skyrocketed and they invested less. Joe made sure there was less to invest in. So yeah the oil companies made out like bandits. But they produced less not more. It they were pumping out the fuel to record limits like you suggest why would Joe have to empty out the emergency reserve? Or are you talking about Legato's graph? Maybe we read graphs differently but the way I read that one Joe inherited an amazing rise in oil production. He did not create it.

I'll even help you, Mikey. Would you like to go with this one: https://www.thoughtco.com/hasty-generalization-fallacy-1690919 I couldn't remember the name of it so I had to look it up. I call it Lassoing. Will that do? I hope so because I'd like to make it famous. It's the left's favourite trick. The parameters don't quite catch what I'm talking about once you stop pretending you don't understand I'm talking about a projected possibility based on real life examples and not claiming that projection as existing fact.

Oh and speaking of logical fallacies, I love that stuff. I notice you didn't want to name the one you're accusing me of. Go ahead, name it. Let's see how big an expert you really are.

And your Net Nannying is getting tedious. Wrong-speakers being arrested for saying the wrong thing will be moved to the internet soon then quietly managed and arrested as offences when nobody is looking. It's already happening without a digital ID in the UK. Imagine when they get one. Using the Christian speech as wrong-think example, we saw 3 more examples in Alberta during the scamdemic. Go ahead, ask for the cite. We both know you'll be watching video of an Alberta reverend being pulled out of his car into a waiting police car. These are the kinds of things Digital ID will facilitate. It won't be so messy and much broader is the only difference That's the point you continue to pretend you don't get. Others see it though, no matter how much you think you can net nanny them away from believing their lying eyes.

Is it? Is domestic production of fuel up--way up? Then why was America energy independent during Trump's Time in office but during Biden's he's hat in hand to Venezuela and kissing the rings of Arabian Sheiks begging to send more. Even by Legato's graph which seems to indulge in a little creative graphing at the end (which I'm told is common. To tail a graph upwards at the end.) it looks like whatever increase there is, is Biden is making statistical hay off Trump's increases.

It has everything to do with what Digital IDs will eventually be used for. That was the point. Go ahead, pretend you missed it. Try banning an LGBTQ student for saying LGBTQ things and see if the police come to arrest him.

You know who Digital IDs will one day be weaponized to protect us from? People like 16 year old Josh Alexander: " That Canada is becoming less tolerant comes as no surprise, but even so a Catholic high school getting one of their 16-year-old students arrested is a bit of a shock, especially when the heart of the issue is his religious beliefs. Josh, a Christian, believes there are only two genders, that people can’t switch genders, and that male students shouldn’t use girls’ washrooms. But expressing those views in a classroom discussion on gender at St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ont., got him suspended. “I walked into one of my classes. I sat down and everyone looked pretty surprised to see me there. Within two minutes the vice-principal was in the classroom asking me to leave,” Alexander said of his attempt to reenter the school this week, adding that he was met with police almost immediately after leaving class." https://nationalpost.com/opinion/catholic-school-has-student-arrested-for-expressing-catholic-beliefs Except the middle man in the future won't be some Prog wokey teacher who somehow scammed a position in a Catholic school. It will be the legally required reporting of an infraction to a central data base that will be alerted by a digital ID. The consequences will be more certain and there will be consequences. Even if it's just 10 points against his social credit score.

Yeah, this: is not a Digital ID issue. However...in order for the centralized database connected to Digital ID to envelop all governmental and private entities they must establish there are evils to protect the simple-minded populace from. That's step 1. That's what this wants to do. Stop it at step 1 and Digital ID is not a problem. Apparently Mikey doesn't like that. So he's flexing his internet nanny muscles. Telling you he doesn't want you discussing it. Those arms are less impressive than you think Mikey. Large issues encourage multiple topics on internet forums all the time. Hands up. Who wants Mikey deciding which ones you're allowed to discuss?

Forget about cites. You know the image that's frozen in mine and many others' heads? Trudeau at the podium telling us why he's freezing bank accounts and Chrystia Freeland nodding like a dashboard bobblehead in the background. But we didn't see that, right? Because I won't jump the fence for you and wrestle with the metaphorical pig. "You just get dirty and the pig likes it."

Some of us and more every day won't play boiling frog to you and yours. We're jumping out of the pot. Don't like it? We don't care.

There was no problem, freezing the bank accounts of people disagreeing with mandates. Right, Mikey?

Look, you're fooling nobody. You're for it and against it. For the idea the of too much control is a problem for a sentence or when it's convenient to you then it's all, "We have firemen so don't worry about secret police. It'll be fine."

And yes I heard you, Mister Wishy Washy. 'Maybe there's a problem but no, not really. Follow me to the land of ignore.'

Oh well, I guess everything's OK then. Nothing to worry bout here, folks. Move on now.

I've always suspected this is one of the reasons you have to be suspicious of government stats. You don't know how many are covid and how many are jab related. Then there's all the other hiddens in "with" not "from" Covid.

It requires a central, gradually becoming, all encompassing database and can be shared between entities.