Infidel Dog

This was the question in your OP, "Do you boycott particular businesses due to political/social issues? Why?" I answered it. Stop whining just because you don't like that answer. Oh and sorry you had to put it into extra whine mode because I called you a whiney little whiner. The software wouldn't let me say "Whiney Little B1tch.

Wasn't talking about how diversity has taken over Hollywood. Separate issue, but I'm pretty sure you already knew that. I'm specifically saying if TV network advertisers want to appear to be saying there's something wrong with white guys, white guy don't have to buy their product. You apparently think they do. Tough on you then. Haven't changed my mind. Boy, you sure do like the wokey side of these issues for somebody who claims residence in the wish-washy middle. Can't help noticing.

What garbage is that? That no-name Wal-mart Pepto Bismol costs about $2 less than the advertised version. Look it up. That diverse relationships are prioritized on TV ads to the point we pretty much are being required to accept there's something wrong with a white woman accepting a white man as a man? Get a TV. Turn it to a network station. Turn off your 'ignore the obvious' filter and watch. You know what I think? You got caught looking for a "gotcha," couldn't find one and now you're whining like a whiney little whiner. Go cry in somebody else's beer. Mine's taken.

Speaking of Pepto Bismol... How far did you want to take this nonsense? I may need some soon. Well, it will be Wal Mart no-name actually.

Oh, what the Hell... I don't care either way. Advertised product costing $2 more on a $10 bill: Pepto Bismol versus Wal Mart no name. Ads that tell us male whites suck. Can't afford network TV, eh? Ok, here's a trope that's starting to bug me. The one that says if a good looking white women is in a satisfactory relationship it can't be with a white guy. (Well maybe...rarely...in varying situations.) There's tons more but you know where and how to look now. Happy investigating.

Why? Double-checking for a "gotcha?" Or do you like my idea and want to join?

I guess... Won't buy Halal. Won't buy an advertised project if I have an un-advertised one as an alternative. Every once in a while I find myself forced to watch network TV and from there I get the impression advertisers don't like me as a white guy and don't want me buying their products. So, given the opportunity, I don't. Anyway...I find you're paying about 2 dollars on a 10 dollar bill for the advertisement.

Anyone who isn't an incurable, brain-dead, Progressive NPC needs to see this one: It isn't Tucker but it's why we need memes. Especially when they're right on and chuckle-worthy like this one.

Crack me up. Robo wants to talk about "logic and reason" like he has a clue what those are. If it isn't a left wing talking point about you're just stumbling around looking for one, NPC.

Never learned to care about an opinion piece from the New York Times (a former newspaper.)

Basically Robo agrees with NYT that Desantis sucks. So what? Who cares?

It's worth noting that if you click the link in the OP to the 'fishwrap of record's' paygated story on this the title they give you is "Florida Could Start Looking a Lot Like Hungary." And it's strongly labelled as "Opinion."

There was also an investigation of Loudermilk's tour that found nothing amiss by the FBI. And no, Trump voters don't run the FBI. I think Mar a Lago proved that.

Oh, so now there are tunnels are there? You have any evidence they don't have locks or security, Evidence Boy? I imagine Photograph guy with the imaginary children who attached himself to the tour already knew about these or why in your conspiracy theory would he need the pics. And if he already knew about them why would he need them? The only thing we really know is nobody used these tunnels or any other tunnels Jan. 6 or we would have heard about it. (Sorry AOC. Wasn't she also supposedly being attacked in another building down the street while the riot was going on.) BTW that's the same leftist British rag you got your previous disproven nonsense from isn't it? I say disproven because they still insist it wasn't a family event even though Tucker produced video of the families. Also there's this: Isn't Tom Manger the police chief you were previously quoting from another partisan link as being a superior authority on medical affairs to the medical examiner? Sure he is. So now the police chief is an authority on medical affairs but he doesn't know squat about police affairs. Is that the donkey dung you and your UK rag are pushing? See how easy that old conspiracy theory from The Guardian falls apart?

I'm sure we're all impressed by your wide range of expertises, though. Earlier we were dazzled by what seemed to be a claim from you of superior medical expertise to a medical examiner. You seemed to be suggesting it was superior to the medical examiner's on Brian Sicknick's stroke. Now you seem to be telling us your legal expertise on this Loudermilk matter is superior to the FBI's. Again, from the full quote: " the committee knew the FBI had already cleared him before the Democrats accused him"

No more freebies Evidence Boy. You want to demand evidence from everybody else. Produce some. Down the road from where the tour was, you mean? You forgot to quote something. Here I'll help you. From the full quote: "Mr. Loudermilk giving a tour to his Georgia constituents of a congressional building down the street from the Capitol."

See, I read that and all I hear is you don't like Tucker Carlson. The easy response to that is, so what? It's nothing like a point that's relevant to the video proof Tucker presented we were told lies during the Democrat subcommittee television mini-series event they tried to manipulate. The fact you and yours don't like Tucker means nothing in the face of that. You want to believe the lies you were told and Tucker made that difficult. So what?

Here ya go, R&R. You did this so I thought I'd do it back at you. An article from a newspaper you'd consider partisan: Scalise calls on Democrats to apologize to Loudermilk for Jan. 6 scrutiny " House Majority Leader Steve Scalise called on Democratic lawmakers to publicly apologize to Rep. Barry Loudermilk for falsely accusing him of helping plan the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. “Transparency is an important thing, and so the public is going to be able to see a lot more information. But ultimately, and for my colleague Barry Loudermilk, I think he’s owed an apology by every Democrat who questioned him on the events prior to Jan. 6,” Mr. Scalise, Louisiana Republican, told reporters. “They implied things about him that weren’t true that those tapes revealed. And I’m waiting for those apologies to come because they owe it to him.” The Jan. 6 select committee accused Mr. Loudermilk, Georgia Republican, of leading a reconnaissance mission through the Capitol the day before the protest, implying he helped the insurrectionists attack the building. “The behavior of these individuals during the Jan. 5, 2021, tour raises concerns about their activity and intent while inside the Capitol complex,” stated committee Chairman Rep. Bennie G. Thompson, Mississippi Democrat, wrote in a letter to Mr. Loudermilk, requesting his testimony. Mr. Thompson denied to The Washington Times that the committee deceptively edited any footage the panel released. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, told Politico last June she was “sickened” when she saw the initial video clip of Mr. Loudermilk. The Times contacted Ms. Jackson Lee’s office for comment but did not hear back. Among the new Jan. 6 Capitol security footage released by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, California Republican, to Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson was that of Mr. Loudermilk giving a tour to his Georgia constituents of a congressional building down the street from the Capitol. “The surveillance tape that we reviewed shows this story is a lie. And the Democrats on the committee knew it was a lie when they told it,” Mr. Carlson said of the footage. According to Mr. Loudermilk, the committee knew the FBI had already cleared him before the Democrats accused him, but wanted to create a story that would fit their narrative. Mr. Thompson refused to apologize. " https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/8/steve-scalise-calls-democrats-apologize-barry-loud/

For the third time, watch the Tucker video. Stop embarrassing yourself. The Tucker footage reveals the tour as a family event. Your MSNBC video shows a mouthy guy who previously made some loudmouthed threats according to the MSNBC host. Loudmouth somehow attached himself to the family tour and was taking pictures of hallways and staircases. So what did lone wolf, selected, picture-taking guy actually do then? Supposedly he wanted to target Pelosi and Nadler according MSNBC host guy. They look fine to me. Well as good as one could expect from a stomach stabled clown and an old crone alcoholic anyway.

Oh yeah, the police chief. There's a superior medical authority to the chief medical examiner. They didn't charge the pepper sprayers with murder so we know that wouldn't fly. So now Chief Manger and you tell us Officer Sicknick was overly stressed by a hard day on the job. Apparently you and Chief Manger are what you called "everyone" now are you? You and Police chief manger want to believe something so it becomes true, does it? Is that the way it works? Maybe if Chief Manger was so worried about stressing his officers he should have made sure there was an adequate number of police on the job that day. And maybe if they thought Brian's health was such he couldn't handle the stress of dealing with a protest that day Chief Manger should have had him behind a desk that day. Being the superior expert on Officer Sicknick's medical condition and all, I mean. Added stress from that afternoon could maybe have tipped the scale on Officer Sicknick's heart condition. But you and Chief Manger are saying you both know for a fact that was the deciding factor. Where did you two study?

Strange use of the word, "Everyone." Any reasonable person watching the newly released video of Sicknick in perfect health running around doing his job in the rotunda after any confrontations he may have had in the courtyard doesn't know what you suggest. Not if they possess reason and common sense. As to your "death by pepper spray" hypothesis, do you know who doesn't believe that? The medical examiner who examined Sicknick's body and anybody who actually believes in following the science: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56810371

Sorry back at you. I might have accepted your apology at one time. But as I recall you're the guy who's always demanding evidence. So produce some or admit you're full of BS.

Link it or stop lying.

Or you could prove it, Evidence Boy. Show us how the footage of the Qanon shaman being escorted around by friendly officers was shown to the court. Show me in a court document where they quote the footage where he was speechifying, unironically thanking the capitol police for being so helpful. He's doing 4 years for simply being in the capitol building that day. He had access to none of that footage that may have helped his case.

Robo: this bit from your far left rag The Guardian is a lie: " That person’s activity was captured on security cameras and turned over to the House select committee investigating the insurrection at the Capitol. The panel made the footage publicly available on Wednesday in a letter demanding cooperation in its inquiry from Loudermilk." It's the kind of like you acolytes of Prog swallow up and try to replicate. It tells part of the truth without telling all of it. Once you see it all though you know it's a lie. They make all of the footage public. They made an edited clip public. Tucker showed us the other bit where it was just families milling about with their children. These were your supposed spies. As to the rest, Tucker contradicts those details. So who do we believe? Well since my 2 eyes showed me The Guardian is willing to lie about this I'm going to believe Tucker until you or your British rag can give us better details. And again watch the video. Stop embarrassing yourself.