Infidel Dog

During the millennial assurgency of Woke, schoolboards became the personal bivouac of the army of Prog. Last night in Florida the populist movement of ' the 1776 Project' started to reclaim the Schoolboard territory: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/23/leftists-crushed-school-boards-across-florida/ Now me, I think that's a good thing and hope the general idea behind the movement continues all the way up into Canada.

Mediabiasfactcheck is run by this armchair leftist guy. I think he also has some leftist volunteers like Snopes or Wikipedia. The left loves to volunteer for that kind of crap so they can weight it down with heavily partisan thumbs. Using MBFC to check the bias of others is a joke. His opinion matters no more than anybody else's. He likes to throw that BS term 'far right' around without seeming to have any real definition of it that matter so I don't have much use for him. And I stand by the claim Real Clear's polling average is mainstream. They archive stories from all sides of the political spectrum in spite of anything what's his name from MBFC might want you to believe. Your defamation of RCP is about as valid as if I found some leftist connection to say, Ground News, called them 'Far Left' and strutted around implying therefore nobody is allowed to give them attention. You know...like what you do. BTW anti-immigrant and Islamophobe are also BS terms.

When you say something really dumb like that I can't read any further. RealClearPolitics is about as non-partisan as they come. And I say that because they post from both sides and only insist on quality. Both sides and moderates quote from them. Have you never heard the phrase, 'Real Clear Polling average?' Probably not so I'll just tell you - it's a thing. An oft used term. It's generally assumed across the political spectrum to add credibility to a claim.

If you believe it these trouble-makers follow something called Queen Romana Didulo. https://queenromanadidulo.ca/ She claims to have been born in British Columbia but has an accent that's not native. She also claims to have supernatural powers. There's a claim she can make herself invisible. I don't know. This all seems so far out there I'm having a hard time believing anybody is falling for it. I suspect a hoax.

Your implication Trump fired Comey out of fear the truth would come out was clear. That's false. Also a wild claim that nobody anywhere other than partisan fanatics and truth-bending activists ever believed or do now that you've put it out here. If you want to pretend that isn't what you were saying or it's true if you did you're lying and I don't care where you want to go from there.

I hear they like parades.

BTW Trump offered multiple explanations over time for canning Comey. None of those supported Groot's implication of fear the truth would come out. That never happened: " Trump claimed he canned Comey because "he was not doing a good job" and the White House cited the FBI chief's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation as the reason they were firing the veteran G-man." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-reveals-he-asked-comey-whether-he-was-under-investigation-n757821

I asked nothing. I told and still tell you, when you post a wild claim without context it's suspicious. This was just another example. You say: Here's the context: See the difference? I doubt it, so I'll explain. The way you're telling it Trump is in fear of legitimate investigation. But what Trump expressed was the possibility the mounting ferocity of the witch hunt attack to bring him down might have been successful. And there was never any doubt Trump considered that attack to be a hoax. He did say that on multiple occasions and I don't need a link for that because it's common knowledge. But if you doubt it just ask. I'll provide you some quotes. You won't though because unlike your support the context favors Trump. Without context what you expressed was a lie. That's why you needed a link. And that's why you didn't want to give one.

See, when you say stuff like that but don't offer any support for it, it just makes me say to myself, 'this guy either thinks he's psychic, has that unfortunate symptom of Progitis where truth is simply anything he'd like to believe or thinks we're too lazy to call his BS - most likely, 2 of the above. I don't actually think he's psychic. In any case it disinclines one to read any further into your post.

There was however a successful coup when Dems, activists, moneyed elite, the swamp, weak judges social, corporate and all other leftist media coordinated to exploit flaws (eg. the covid scare) they created or found within the weakened electoral system at the time.

That's it? That's you're humorous comeback? I'm beginning to see why you find Randy funny.

They go into greater detail on those and offer a few more at the link below: Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again

Again, why are Progs so interested in influencing who us Conservatives vote to lead are party? Speaking of BS, I mean. Are we honestly expected to believe they care about what would be best for us?

He might be if that was what he said. But it wasn't. So the only one pissing on our leg here is you.

I copied that from 5 posts up. There's also the Lincoln Project. They're at least gone from the Republican orbit. Nobody considers them Republican anymore. But yeah, if Trump returns and does what he says as far as cleaning out the swamp goes that should take care of the Obamas. They're up there with swamp Control. There are what I would call Republican swampsters too so good-bye Lindsay Graham and Mitch McConnel.

Come to think of it and speaking of political family legacies that Trump took out, the Clintons are done now too. Kind of a shame he missed the Obamas though. Oh well, next time.

If you're looking for a dose of the Monkey Pox, I guess.

Less and less... The power centers of the neo cons are pretty much gone now. The Bushes, The McCains and now the Chaneys. All Gone. Washed away in the wave of America First. The Republican swampies like Graham and McConnel need to go next. You could ask the Lincoln Project if they still think they're Republicans. I didn't hear about them being at CPAC this time around.

First, I hate to say it but as always, you're wrong. They gave a name to the IRS agents they armed to make it sound official - "Special Agents." But they are IRS and they are armed. In 2018 the GAO reported the IRS has more than 2000 IRS enforcement agents with more than 4,000 weapons. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/08/16/an_irs_thats_armed_and_dangerous_148052.html I'm not going to spend the rest of the day looking for it but Tucker claims OpentheBooks.com has found the IRS spent more than 20 million dollars on guns and ammo between 2006 and 20019. The IRS is currently hiring. Here's one of the qualifications. Be legally allowed to carry a firearm. https://www.jobs.irs.gov/resources/job-descriptions/irs-criminal-investigation-special-agent Congressman Matt Gaetz just introduced the Disarm the IRS act. 87,000 new agents is based on Republican math and the Treasury department wants to quibble about who new agents would be and like to insinuate a significant portion are replacement personnel but there is no quibble over the fact they are using the bounty they just had poured on them from Biden's new bill to hire new personnel. Now how much of that is going into their armed division and how many new "special agents" will they hire out of the 10s of thousands of new hires? There are different opinions but mine and many others are as valid as your "fact checker" 'nothing to see here' version. My estimate on how many of the '87,00' will be armed "Special Agents" is as many as suits the IRS at the time. The right wing Heritage organization makes this equally valid guesstimate: https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/fact-checking-team-biden-who-those-87000-new-irs-agents-would-audit

The Whitmer Kidnapping plot was an FBI fabricated hoax. Go ahead Jack and herb show us how superior you are by proving that wrong. Bet you can't.

Really? Want a better one. You can see the whole thing by Tucker where he goes into Merrick Garland whining to you gullible dupes about how he and the FBI are the real victims. Then he shows in example after real world example how that's a lie: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZecYowTeZyDn/

Oh wait...here's that clip from Tucker I was telling you about where he goes into the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping hoax: and here's another one on the Jan 6 planted Pipe Bomb mystery:

Yeah, isn't it cute when they virtue signal their ignorance? Like refusing knowledge if it says something they're not comfortable with makes them in some way superior.