Infidel Dog

Progressives won't get this one below. To them this is just proper decorum in reaction to the Mar a Lago raid: For the rest of though what a clever smile of a troll.

No. It's also not what we were talking about there. Why? Did you want to talk about that now? You seem to think you know something about it. I'm going to assume you've at least watched the film then. Did you not see the people dropping the ballots in the boxes?

First of all you're misreading the quote that allows to believe they need an "app." The quote didn't say App. It said Apps. As in multiple sources. They're commercially available. Here's another quote from another source I linked here. You obviously didn't read or misread that one too. Here, try again or at least read it once: A 2019 New York Times series, “The Privacy Project,” revealed a lot about how granular this data can be. In a piece from that project titled “Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy,” Times journalists reported on what they found after analyzing a data file containing 50 billion location pings from 12 million Americans over a several-month period in 2016 and 2017. In the introduction they state (emphasis mine): And, says the Times, this information isn’t generated solely by big tech or government surveillance, and is openly available to anyone who wants to pay for it. All those sources are linked to HERE. I think if you dummies read the sources your linked to correctly you'll have less of this problem Progs seem to have of reporting fact as fiction and fiction as fact.

Try this one. https://rumble.com/v13ww39-from-one-drop-box-to-another-to-a-nonprofit-to-another-drop-box-whats-up-wi.html He says they bought the data. I imagine if I wanted to spend the rest of the day looking I could find where he bought the data.

Dunno... And I've never heard Dinesh mention it. The organization that performed the operation though is called True the Vote. A woman runs it. When she appears being interviewed on the subject of geo tracking she has this expert guy appearing with her and they discuss details. Apparently it was a pretty big operation. You should be able to find the interviews on a video site.

Oh for God's sake... You wanted a link to evidence I said I'd already posted on 2000 mules. I told you I had already posted the information you were pretending to be interested in on other threads where the topic of 2000 mules was being discussed here, at this board. If you were at least half as smart as you seem to think you are you could simply have gone to the 2000 mules thread in this US Federal Politics forum where we are right now (which you should know exists because you posted on that thread.) There you would have found a link to a piece in American Thinker where you could have seen this: So you see the link you continue to whine about not being provided was given to you when you began this silly diversion from the unjustified raid on President Trump's home.

Whining when you don't get your way is. You were told where your links were on the board. Couldn't figure that out? Poor baby.

This one below, however, really is worth a study: U.S. Attorney posts excellent thread on ‘problematic Affidavit’

In any case I'd already posted links to debunkings of the bogus fact checkers claims regarding the 2000 mules evidence. I told Mikey that. If he was really the expert on boards he claims to be he could have simply found that thread.

Are you saying you have something new to whimper about? Ahh...did your board used to be all circle jerky with Progness and now it's not. Poor baby. Try CKA.

I might veer off topic to destroy your little strawman for you if I had a clue what you were talking about. Somebody said Progressives won a war on Christmas? Who was that? Why would it matter to me? I knew you guys were making moves to at least take the Christ out of Christmas. I knew Commie Bonnie Henry tried commanding people not to have Christmas celebrations last year because apparently you guys were scared of the Kung Flu or something. But I wasn't aware of you "winning" anything. We had a big group celebration of Christmas at my house just to piss Commie Bonnie off. We sang The First Noel.

I watched a bit of the second one. The supreme court case that dealt with geo tracking is called The Carpenter Case. They found geo tracking was as accurate as putting an ankle bracelet on a prisoner.

Oh wait, Mikey. You got lucky. I just scanned through my bookmarks. Turns out I saved a couple. You should find something you're looking for here: Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: AP's Hit Piece on '2000 Mules' is Full of Holes Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers on 2000 Mules

Don't be so damned lazy. I told you where and how to look. I guess I could succumb to your relentless whimpering and look it up for you but I'm kind of waiting for you to tell me it doesn't exist.

As I recall there are multiple replies to that one including a claim from a Democrat politician but the one that sticks was a court case where accuracy was addressed and found to be accurate within a couple of feet. Also, I assume you at least know this was the technology used to identify the 600 political prisoners of January 6. Curiously enough the only one it couldn't identify was that mysterious pipe bomber of the pipe bombs that didn't actually go off but made for good media. As I said, all this stuff is out there. You just have to look. Try Rumble. I know Dinesh goes into it and I think there are others.

I can but I already have on other threads here. They've been debunked in multiple places about the internet. If you insist on using Google you may be able to find them if you start on the fifth page. Or you could just go to Startpage or Duck Duck Go. It may amuse you to see me provide them again for you. But it isn't my job to amuse you.

I've gone through those fact checks of 2000 mules. They're all bogus with one exception. And that one comes from the Right. Where are the names of the NGOs that provided the phony ballots to the mules? It was promised and although Dinesh says somebody somewhere did reveal them they haven't reached any outlet I'm aware of. It would be game changing information if it was out there. But it's not. Nevertheless everything else they have tells us there is a there, there. Somewhere.

But none of this changes the fact Mike is so desperately trying to divert from. We saw the beginning of the end of woke control of schoolboards happening in Florida a few days ago. I predict it will continue and possibly even spread as far north as Canada no matter how much the Progs whine and sniffle and stomp their feet. Right Mike? Like how's that working out for you so far?

What this story in the OP says is the age of woke is fading to gone from Florida schools and no amount of wokey tears will change that.

In any case that was Virginia, wasn't it? And I think the parents were outraged before the guy with the raped daughter showed up. This movement by parents to retake control of their kids schooling from the social justice warrior types may have began in Virginia, however it was Florida that handed the wokeys their SJW asses in the schoolboard elections last night. The majority voted out the wokesters. And the Progressive response to that appears to be their usual, "Wahhhh..."

But basically...yeah...stop indoctrinating kids into your psycho progressive "woke" ideology and maybe concerned parents will stop reclaiming control of the schoolboards. You shouldn't care, Mikey. After all it's just "a culture war," right?

Let's remember what started this one. A guy - an ordinary person - was reporting his daughter raped in a girl's washroom by a boy dressed as and claiming to be a girl. He was dragged out of the schoolboard meeting by security. And your advice there would be what? Pay no attention? It's just a culture war?

Curious then, that he's on the front page list of "Popular Contributors" and you're not.