Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,868

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Infidel Dog

  1. Infidel Dog
    Oh I see... The additional periods in the user names. Question: Are there still mods here? Because if not I've got a bunch of memes I'd love to post.
  2. Infidel Dog
    I don't get it. Did Monkey Pox Man find a way to hijack the accounts of you 3? If this is some kind of joke I just have one thing to say... Worst Joke Ever.
  3. Infidel Dog
    Sorry, Monkey Pox Man, they won't allow you in my fan club. Hey, I backed you, Bud. I told them the pox isn't airborn, so if they just kept you at a distance they were fine but they told me it was more the Prog thing they couldn't tolerate.
  4. Infidel Dog
    Nancy invoked a 'TDSer RINOs Only" rule on her (to quote Mike Pompeo) "Monkey Court" coming out of the gate. So how can anybody take it seriously as an unbiased, non-partisan, investigative committee? Answer: We can't.
  5. Infidel Dog
    BTW, was there somebody earlier claiming you couldn't use expressive terms like "show trial" because it isn't an actual trial? Most likely somebody who likes to throw around terms like Coup or Insurrectionist to describe Jan 6. Now it is true there are no actual Monkeys or Kangaroos serving at Nancy's, Jan 6, Kangaroo/Monkey court inquisition, but there are a couple of RINOs
  6. Infidel Dog
    Prog Logic. "Here's a selected thing. Therefore any and all things remotely similar are the same thing." They aren't, but if you want we could also talk about John Sullivan. The BLM, Antifa flavored activist leading the charge into the building, calling himself a reporter. He can be heard enthusiastically egging on the saboteurs, at one point yelling, “It’s our house, motherf—ers!” https://nypost.com/2021/01/15/who-is-john-sullivan-accused-provocateur-charged-in-capitol-riot/ There are other suspicious characters that appear to have gone to the building to start something. We can talk about those if you like. For example, there were instigators at the gates of the capitol building looking for trouble before Trump finished his speech. Who were they and why isn't this Show Trial/Faux Trial, "Monkey Court," phoney Jan 6 committee interested in them?
  7. Infidel Dog
    TP the Monkey Pox Man is back under a different user name. I hope the rest of you Progs are watching. This the type of winner your ideology attracts.
  8. Infidel Dog
    The problem there is I haven't a clue what you're talking about. Diversion to the obtuse, maybe? My point is very clear and has nothing to do with whatever you're postulating there. There is no scientific consensus on the idea of an imminent, and inevitable, human caused Warmageddon. You seem to think I expressed a requirement of 100% though. Not sure where that comes from. Your side made a claim of 97. I'll discuss that with you, if you want. Back to my original point though. This idea you have there is a "vast body of scientific expertise" supporting consensus (of any kind) on fossil fuel Warmageddon is a fantasy. Go ahead though. Show it to me. You've failed so far and your buddy chirping from the cheap seats is so worried he desperately continues to insist we talk about something else.
  9. Infidel Dog
    And your desperate need to divert from the point is laughable to me and useless to you. It won't work. When you apply what you really mean to this new, ambiguous and thus apocryphal definition of the term "climate change" there is no consensus. There is no scientific consensus for this: "an inevitable human caused, humanity ending, climate catastrophe."
  10. Infidel Dog
    And as I said to the last Greta fan that tried the ol' proggy divert with a mock trick. I'll even stop the counter-mock on his reliance on the partisan search ap, Google providing his support for his imagined consensus is on this specifically: an inevitable human caused, humanity ending, climate catastrophe.
  11. Infidel Dog
    No. My point is the same one I've posted 3 times now and you seem madly, desperate to divert away from. My point remains this one:
  12. Infidel Dog
    Another nobody they apparently also cared about also got charged for parading. He committed suicide. A couple of nobodies they also cared about went to prison for walking inside doors opened by the guards and taking selfies. And on it goes with the nobodies the swamp did care about. Now, oh wise one...explain to us why they didn't care about the nobody who spent a night and a day inciting crowds to go into the capitol building. Ray Epps.
  13. Infidel Dog
    The swampies care enough about nobodies to imprison a 69 year old, nobody cancer victim grandmother for some Mickey Mouse non-crime, misdemeanor no BLM or Antifa member ever has to worry about, humorously titled "Parading." But they don't care about this guy? C'mon Mikey. Get real.
  14. Infidel Dog
    Didn't happen. At least not the way you're suggesting. Might not be your fault though. I notice that's kind of the MO of the kind of news some of us find fake and you consider sacred. They make an insinuation based on some small, isolated, facty sounding information and then start talking like the fact is a given. This fake Jan. 6 committee has them doing it with the idea they've proven Trump guilty of incitement. No they haven't. Nancy and her fellow clowns have found no actual evidence of any such thing. Another Canadian example would be this visit from the Pope. The Liberal paid news, or if you would prefer, mainstream Canadian news, has put the idea before us that mass graves of indigenous children is a proven fact. It's not. They also talk like we're to believe the Pope is apologizing for these supposed mass graves of children. Is he? Show me. I haven't seen that yet. He does seem to be apologizing for the church's involvement in the abuses of the residential school system but I haven't heard him mention mass graves as one of those. Yet they've got the gullibles like yourself believing there were mass graves and the Pope apologized for them specifically.
  15. Infidel Dog
    " Three people, including the alleged gunman, were killed Monday in a mass shooting outside Vancouver, Canada, that appears to have targeted homeless people, authorities said. Police said an unidentified gunman began shooting after 6 a.m. local time in multiple places in downtown Langley, about 30 miles southeast of Vancouver, local media reported. Royal Canadian Mounted Police previously said they had a suspect in custody, and it’s unclear if they were referencing the now-deceased gunman. Cops discovered the gunman wounded and shot him dead at the scene, police said in a statement. Another victim of the gunman was left in critical condition and a second had serious injuries, authorities said. The victims of the attack were found throughout the city, including one at a bus stop and another near a supportive housing unit. The gunman’s and victims’ names have not been released." https://nypost.com/2022/07/25/1-dead-several-injured-in-mass-shooting-in-langley-bc/
  16. Infidel Dog
    I don't imagine this gets much attention east of the Rockies but the Virtanen trial has been talk of the town over here on this side: https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nhl/former-canucks-forward-jake-virtanen-found-not-guilty-of-sexual-assault/ar-AA100dmS
  17. Infidel Dog
    You talked me into it. And I haven't even clicked the link yet. That could even swallow globalism of the western elite up.
  18. Infidel Dog
    And let's be clear... This was my original request: You've yet to address it. You're still trying the old dodge of redefining what you mean by consensus then taking a superior pose to the actual request. All you've produced is posturing. Go ahead though...now that it's clear what we're actually talking about show me all this "science" on the absolute certainty of Warmageddon. We both know you can't. It doesn't exist. There are some models. If models are as reliably foolproof in their prophetic power as they'd like you to believe why doesn't somebody take them to the racetrack and get rich? Shall we discuss Y2K?
  19. Infidel Dog
    Based on what? On what you'd like to believe? The consensus paper that got the most attention was the one by the runner of the mistakenly named blog "Skeptical Science." Here's a rational and fact based explanation of why that paper is bogus: Consensus? What Consensus? There are other papers claiming to support consensus. Most are even less credible than the one Cook and his blog activist users put together. I notice the problem they often have is establishing a clear definition of what they mean by "Climate Change." So what they wind up doing is proving things even climate sceptics realists agree with. Everybody agrees Climate Changes. Almost all know CO2 and other gases can induce some warming. The question is how much. But the first consensus paper I ever saw tried to convince people it had established a consensus by simply asking scientists does Climate Change and can humans influence warming. Here's the problem: how does that show an inevitable coming catastrophe caused by human influenced global warming? There is no consensus for that and I defy you to produce evidence there is. I'll even let you use Google. Your first attempt failed at that. Try again.
  20. Infidel Dog
    In fact if you ever get brave enough to really check into it you'll find not just Cook's joke of a paper he and the users of his blog scratched together but all consensus papers are more than a bit of a joke.
  21. Infidel Dog
    First of all you're using Google which is useless for anything within the Progressive narrative. Secondly you're using the term "Climate Change" which is an ill defined and I'd say bogus term. But we're talking about consensus and the one that got the most play from your news was what they call the 97% consensus. Even your Google link mentions it. They of course are in love with it so you'll only get that side. There is another side. It says the 97% consensus is bogus. You won't check it out so you'll have to take my word for it. It's very persuasive. Impossible to counter once you know all the details. Try Duck Duck Go if your mind ever decides to open up. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=97+%+consensus&atb=v315-1&ia=web
  22. Infidel Dog
    I deny nothing Cougar. But I don't mind straightening you out on the facts when they show you to be incorrect. And yes, I realize you're heavy into "see know evil" mode, but I still think there's hope for you. Here's a former Obama official whose coming around after being hit over the head by climate reality. If the day ever comes you're prepared to listen he'll explain to you why heat waves and the odd record heat reading are useless as an indication of any kind of existential threat from your imagined Climate Catastrophe.
  23. Infidel Dog
    So you can't verify this wild climate catastrophe claim of yours after all then? Too bad...I was hoping you could at least offer up something more substantial than a few summer heat records. Kind of a pathetic attempt, if you ask me.
  24. Infidel Dog
    So when you say "every" do you just mean every year somewhere a record is being broken? Or do you mean every year "every"where? The second proposal is wrong. So let's say you weren't suggesting that and address the first one. First of all let's not forget what you think you're offering evidence of. That an inevitable human caused catastrophe of warming is coming and you can verify it. Well, here's the thing...you didn't. Let's say it's true. That every year somewhere there's a heat record being set. First of all why would that surprise anybody? The climate has been warming. About a degree Celsius more or less since the end of the little ice age, a little more than a century ago. So now we're at a plateau and temperatures can be higher every now and again, here and there than they were as the little ice age wound down. But you said you could verify an imminent humanity ending catastrophe as a result of some human caused warming. When did you plan to do that? Currently this is what it looks like by Satellite temps: In 1998 there was a bump of about 3/10ths of a degree during a super-el nino. Since that time temperatures have stayed pretty steady within the 10ths of a degree range. How does that "verify" your hysteria over what you believe will be an inevitable Warmageddon? You've verified nothing. Try again.
  25. Infidel Dog
    Verify it then. Show us this overwhelming evidence of an inevitable human caused, humanity ending, climate catastrophe. Contrary to what you may believe there is no scientific consensus of that when you describe it specifically, out loud the way I just did. You seem to believe you have evidence to the contrary. Very well. Let's see it.
×
×
  • Create New...