Infidel Dog

And as I already mentioned, memory loss and decline of cognitive ability happens with age but Alzheimer's is a diagnosable line and Reagan didn't meet the parameters of that disease until years after his last term. Possibly one could have mocked Reagan in that last year or so for early onset dementia the way we do with Biden, but that's not the way I remember it. To me the armchair experts who "knew it all along" didn't appear until after his Alzheimer's was diagnosed.

Oh wait...is that what he was talking about? He was never right about that. It was covered. Two Reagan brothers disagreed. The one accused the other of creating the myth of Reagan's early dementia to sell his book. Many lefties and apparently a few persuadable from the right jumped on the myth creating son's conspiracy theory. The doctors say Reagan's diagnosable dementia happened years after his final term. Is this one of those things from the left where all of a sudden we don't have to listen to the experts? I went into all this then congratulated Beave for dragging me off topic with diversion and obfuscation. But at least I know now what he was talking about above, even though it had nothing to do with the quote he used.

What on earth are you talking about, YOUR MAJESTY. I posted this 9 hours before this post of yours above: Trump Adviser Breaks the ‘Bad News’ to the FBI: The ‘Classified Docs’ in Their Possession Were Already Declassified Did you want me to post something about the declassified documents every hour on the hour or something? And the only one I call King of Wrong is you. Don't like it? Stop being wrong.

I was thinking I might actually agree with Mike on something but then...I don't know. Maybe not. MTG is trying to impeach Merrick Garland, so something might come of this. after all. https://mediarightnews.com/rep-paul-gosar-tells-mtg-way-to-go-and-that-he-absolutely-supports-her-filing-articles-of-impeachment-against-merrick-garland/

Got room in there for this one. Tell them the movie They Live that pic is from was a documentary. It's OK. If they can't see how Biden's FBI are acting like Nazis they're so dumb they'll believe anything.

No. Your wrong. If you asked most gun owners why they want a gun the answer would be self-defence. The fastest rising demographic of new gun owners are women. They're not buying them to save America.

It's worth noting there's nothing in the warrant about nuclear secrets. That's the Washington Post quoting their infamous "anonymous sources."

OK so there's the CBC's story, then there's the story from Trump Deputy Director of National Intelligence: https://beckernews.com/trump-adviser-breaks-the-bad-news-to-the-fbi-the-classified-docs-in-their-possession-were-already-declassified-46334/ But OK let's say only the CBC knows what really happened and there are nuclear secrets in those boxes that Trump supposedly put there. He's had this stuff for almost 2 years? It takes Merrick Garland and the CBC that long to sniff this out, does it? And apparently they had the warrant for 3 days before they served it. Is that the sort of urgency you expect from the FBI when it's retrieving nuclear secrets. And why did the FBI think they were going to find nuclear secrets in Melania's underwear drawer?

Nuclear secrets...Pshaw... From the Babylon Bee: 'The FBI Raid On Melania's Closet Was Justified,' Says Merrick Garland Wearing Gorgeous New Evening Gown And Sun Hat " WASHINGTON, D.C. — With many Americans up in arms over the unprecedented raid of former President Trump's residence in Mar-a-Lago by the FBI, Attorney General Garland released a statement to assure everyone the raid was completely justified. Eyewitnesses noted he looked unusually fetching in an elegant Dolce & Gabbana evening gown and a Dior sun hat. "We wouldn't raid Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate or Melania's wardrobe unless it was absolutely, 100% necessary," said Garland. "I resent any accusation that this raid was influenced by partisan politics or my insatiable desire to wear pretty designer dresses." The Attorney General then did a little spin in his purple gown as the press gasped with delight. FBI Director Christopher Wray echoed the statement as he strode up to the Hoover Building in a dazzling pair of diamond-encrusted Alexander McQueen stilettos. "The men and women of the FBI are paragons of unassailable integrity and impartiality, and any suggestion otherwise is murderous treason," he said. Several news outlets present also noted the delicious smell of Chanel No.5 in the air. At publishing time, Trump took to Truth Social to announce that all his golf clubs were also missing.

But yeah...no amount of wishful thinking on the part of the OP is going to make his fantasy happen so why bother with it.

And hey, did they even have teleprompter tech back in Reagan's day? Show me when this was ever necessary with Reagan:

Oh damn... I just fell for it. Everytime I do fall for it, I say never again...then I do. OK, so the original point was Biden had the incompetence of Carter, the waffling tendency of Chamberlain, and Reagan's eventual dementia. Bring on the obfuscation and diversion to deflect from that obvious truth. Let's prioritize whether or not Reagan's dementia was "eventual." You got me Beave with tactic #1 of the Prog playbook. Good for you, I guess.

And I just dealt with a Dementia patient's decline so I know the way this works. Everybody becomes the expert. Everybody saw it coming before you did. Except they didn't. Yes there's a gradual decline in memory and such that starts even before there's any diagnosis of dementia. I'll wager some of you are already experiencing it. But seeing as everybody's an expert now, so am I. Reagan in office never reached Biden's level of obviously diagnosable dementia.

I just love the way you like to dis anybody who disagrees with you as a conspiracy theorist but whenever some partisan wants to suggest something that appeals to your partisan list of things 'you wish were true so let's say they are' you're all over it. And how do you manage to just block out anything that doesn't jive with your fantasy? For example you lead with something from one son's book he was trying to flog but you leave out this from the other son. ""Ron, my brother, was an embarrassment to his father when he was alive and today he became an embarrassment to his mother," read another." It isn't all your fault, I guess because the far lefties at The Guardian write the details in a way to let you know which son a good acolyte of the great God Prog is supposed to believe. And apparently you're not the only one over there on the left who wants to believe this dis of the great conservative ex-President , so it must be true. Apparently other devotees of the left are nodding under their tinfoil hats ignoring what the ex President's team of expert doctors say.

How Joe Biden Helped Create The Crisis Over Ukraine So the war begins and...where's Ukraine's "Iron Dome." Where are the jets the Ukraine needs for a serious defense? Joe picks fights just fine but when it come to finishing them he's a Chamberlain backing down from a fight to win. He made Neville proud in Afghanistan. "Want some tanks, Ahmed? Have some tanks. Missiles? How about some missiles. Have you seen our choppers? Take as many of them as you like." And no. Trump wouldn't have done that. Churchill wouldn't have done it either come to think of it. Neville would have though.

And there's another one you can add to your list as the unchallenged King of Wrong: 40th President of the United States In office January 20, 1981 – January 20, 1989 "When Reagan left office in 1989, he held an approval rating of 68%, matching those of Franklin D. Roosevelt and later Bill Clinton as the highest ratings for departing presidents in the modern era.[6] Although he had planned an active post-presidency, Reagan disclosed in November 1994 that he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease earlier that year." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan Keep on keeping on, your majesty. Do what you do. It has entertainment value.

Maybe even Reagen too...but just because of the Alzheimers Ron came down with after his presidency. As incompetent as Jimmy with Neville's tendency to waffle and Ron's Alzheimers.

Frustrating, isn't it? All you can do is hope somebody else notices. I notice. Apparently Sharkman does. So hang in there.

And you answer my question on your diversion and obfuscation with diversion and obfuscation. You seem to be having trouble staying on topic so I'll help you out. Actually Trump is going to help you out. He explains what the possible connection would be between taking the fifth on the witch hunt in New York and the separate case of the other witch hunt in Florida that ostensibly has nothing to do with the New York witch hunt: https://nypost.com/2022/08/10/donald-trump-arrives-to-be-grilled-by-ag-james/

So why mention it in reference to this then? Just more diversion and obfuscation, I guess. Is there a special course for that in Prog college?

Do you mean this? Donald Trump says he invoked 5th Amendment in deposition for New York investigation\ That New York financial investigation witch hunt has nothing to do with this "classified documents" in Mar a Lago Florida witch hunt.

"Kash Patel served as the Pentagon chief of staff as well as principal deputy to the acting director of national intelligence. He is also a former National Security Council aide, former top House Intelligence Committee staffer, and former federal prosecutor and public defender." None of those are claims you can make. Nor can you claim to have been there when the original documents were processed. Kash can. But none of what you said above matters anyway so I'll go on to discuss the angle of the "classified documents" that does. And what matters there is those most likely imaginary documents don't. That's obvious. Trump had already returned the supposedly "classified documents." If he hadn't why wouldn't they simply have subpoenaed them the way they did with Hillary and her stash of classified material. Unless they were afraid he'd destroy them like Hillary did with her information. BTW Hillary was never the President of the United States and never had the authority to declassify documents. Trump did. But no, they sleazed a FISA home invasion warrant out of an Obama judge whose claim to fame was he used to defend the Epstein crew. Then they publicly raided the ex President of the United States home - looking for what exactly? He'd already returned the supposedly "classified" documents they knew about. And why did they bring a safe cracker with them when they knew where the room was where the original documents had been stored? (The safe was empty btw.) That whole "classified documents" excuse smells, so what makes more sense? A fishing expedition for Jan 6 stuff and anything else they can leak to their secretarial pool in what we call the mainstream media? Maybe. Or are they hoping to instigate the "insurrection" they failed to really spark Jan 6? It's easy to get the feeling that's what they really want. That way they can put it down with force and shut down any opposition for good, 3rd world style.

But you're not going to click that link either because it would be against Prog code to sully the purity of your sacred ignorance so here's a clip: " Patel called the story “disinformation.” “The story says the National Archives found the documents had classification markings on them. That doesn’t mean that they were not declassified. All previously classified documents have classification markings on them, it shows they used to be classified. It’s petty bureaucracy at its finest, government simpletons not following a president’s orders to have them marked ‘declassified.’ The president has unilateral authority to declassify documents — anything in government. He exercised it here in full,” he said. “[For] NBC to make a leap to say, ‘Well that means he released classified information,’ is completely false,” Patel said. “So I think the article is entirely misleading.” Patel said he does not believe NARA spoke to anyone at the Trump White House to see if the documents were declassified, and now will not release the documents to the American public as Trump had intended. “They are not a classification authority. I don’t believe they have unilateral authority to reclassify something the president declassified. They are the holder of records,” he said. Patel did not want to get into what the specific documents were, predicting claims from the left that he was disclosing “classified” material, but said, “It’s information that Trump felt spoke to matters regarding everything from Russiagate to the Ukraine impeachment fiasco to major national security matters of great public importance — anything the president felt the American people had a right to know is in there and more.” Patel said Democrats are playing politics in claiming Trump took classified material, and have not even addressed what is in the material. As to whether Democrats may try to selectively release material and claim Trump tried to hide certain things, Patel said, “The irony is that he didn’t try to hide any of it. He declassified all of it so there’s nothing to hide.”

Mocks the guy who wants to claim he's a conservative. How about Breitbart? How phony a conservative would you have to be not to have heard of Breitbart? Documents at Mar-a-Lago Marked ‘Classified’ Were Already Declassified, Kash Patel Says BTW, that link was embedded in the original.

I thought you climate loons weren't optimistic about there being a 2147.