SkyHigh

KJV is king James version and π is Pi If you seriously don't know that you literally lack the knowledge (and intelligence) to participate in any conversation about science, no just in any conversation period. Of course you don't get it you don't know what π is

Kings 7: 23-26 Then again in 2 Chronicles 4: 2-5 Both KJV both say π is 3 Direct claim by the Bible demonstrably false.

Faith can lead someone to believe in anything. Therefore can never be a path to truth. Someone that has faith in Allah, Budda, crishna, Brahma , Vishnu, etc . believes in their deity as strongly as you do and yet has come to a completely different world view. So again faith is irrelevant. Saying you'll understand if you believe goes against every critical thinking,skill and logical reasoning , I and the entire human race has needed to survive for the last 140'000 years.

You're not even trying now. Here's just a few examples of where the bible is categorical wrong. What's the smallest seed? Do ants act independently? Is π 3.14..... ? If you answer yes to any of these (completely demonstrable) facts, than you acknowledge the Bible has errors.

Logic is a language we use to support assertions. Faith and logic are polar opposites. Seriously take some time and learn about not only the concepts but the literal words you use.

Another person that doesn't understand the word binary. It means it can only be one or the other and since intersex people are born you're just wrong. Realize I said nothing about the many issues that society will have to resolve regarding trans people or anything about gender. I'm taking actual science and no biologist says sex is binary

Nope. Until you can support your assertions towards me, I have no reason to even consider your opinions. If you have to blatantly lie about my views why should I care about the vitriol you spout. Dude you saying I don't want to engage "factual dialogue" , when this whole conversation was me saying using words like leftard excluded you from being taken seriously and your response was, but they're Leftards is absolutely insane.even for your diminished mental health. Not interested in even entertaining your partisan foolishness, until you can either defend your claim I'm a leftard cultist or admitt it's simply a tool you are , I mean use ,because you can't actually engage in a nuanced discussion (or anything even resembling rational dialogue) with anyone not soley planted on one extreme or the other and I sir am neither.

And yet you make blanket statements saying the whole process is completely against your supposed "science" , your dishonesty knows no bounds. Exactly, no reason required All you can say is some (5000 year old) book says a thing. I have thousands of books updated and and advanced continuesly through out thousands of years all confirming the efficacy of the scientific method that has never supported and has in fact disproved much of what is written in your one book.

Still waiting on an actual quote directly from me

Fail. How are there no fossil records of kangaroo's existing anywhere outside of Australia and New Guinea? Answer because they exist by the process of evolution by natural selection. For the last time answers in Genis , creation.com, Kent (or Eric) Hovind or any other organization that openly admits to not using the scientific method is in no way , shape or form to be used as educational material. If that's all you have we can just end the conversation here as you have already conceded that you have nothing but faith ,(something that can't discern fact from fiction) and therefore no logical leg to stand on

And yet you've been challenged to provide any instance of a time that I have advocated for any position that your "leftard cultists" support and have failed. Again proving you're not interested in actually participating in a good faith conversation.

Why must you resort to dishonesty when I bring up legitimate points? You yourself have made arguments that directly contradict this statement 1) you have said (and I agreed) that many scientists are believers. Well many of them have published papers in this "so called peer review" and many are themselves the peers that review and therefore confirm (or deny) the validity of papers. So are you saying that all the christians in science not only accept this supposed bias science has against their most cherished beliefs but actually participate in making their world view seem antiquated and obsolete? 2) you accept that the scientific method can produce results, make technological and medical advancements and help answer questions to better understand the reality we all share ( regardless of world view). You're problem is most (if not all) of the science you accept is directly related to the science you deny and uses the exact same method. Here's just a couple of examples. A )The device you're using to have this conversation is most certainly made of petroleum products (not to mention other natural components). The way they find oil is based on the exact same science (the geological column) that they use as one (of many) of the evidences that support evolution. B ) Paternity tests. You do believe that with DNA someone can prove who their parents, grandparents etc.. are, yes? Again it's the exact same science they use to trace different species to a common ancestor. I have no qualms continuing this conversation but have no interest in having an argument against your pseudo science. I'll try this again. For the purpose of the rest of this discussion I will grant you that the theory of evolution is totally fabricated and has no relation to reality, but that still gets you no closer to showing that your god created the world, so instead of trying to disprove evolution, please provide me with a positive argument for your assertion that God created everything in 6 days, then two thousand years after wiped out all of humanity and started over with 8 people and a bunch of animals on a mountain in the middle east and how that spawned the diversity of life we have today Or even just how kangaroo's got to Australia , seriously answer that one question and I will honestly consider reevaluating my views of the Bible

Well you proved my point on having no interest in rational conversation. But now I realize you're just CUCKoo for coco puffs

Wrong again, that's not how programing (particularly in binary code) works, if the code is corrupt the (entire) program will not work. Because it's binary. Well since you're literally arguing something that is demonstrably not factual, all I can comment on is the potential reasons that such a non issue can be so top of mind to you. In my experience those that dwell on topics so far from the legitimate issues facing society today , do so only because they have personal "feelings" for said issue and being that this is an issue that only really comes up between medical professionals and people that want to be intimate and I know you're not a medical professional, I must assume your interests lie in the more intimate regions of the tranz community. I'm not trying to be insulting, I'm trying to encourage you to live your truth.

I think voter apathy is one of the biggest issues facing democracy. Unfortunately today those that make the most noise are almost exclusively on the extreme end of both sides (right and left) which dissuades the average (rational) voter from wanting to participate in political discourse. This forum and the conversation I'm having with this simpleton is the perfect example. I speak on the need for civility, the need to reach across political lines in order to effectuate change and he calls people perverts. Honestly sad

Amazing how often he ends up arguing against his own points during a conversation

If there is an error in a binary code it will not be able to preform the operations it was programmed to do. Because it's binary. The only person that mentioned tranz issues was you (probably because of the deep seeded sexual fantasies you aren't yet ready to accept) , All I did was explain that actual biologists know that sex is not binary. Unfortunately you have no understanding of basic biology or even what the word binary means.

I don't care about your "Leftards" (or Maggots either, for that matter) the fact is most people aren't as extreme and unbalanced as those two groups. Therefore, if you actually wanted to make a positive change, you're not going to be able to reach the rational majority.with the silly primary school vitriol you use. I would suggest you don't really care about your claims to "morality" but just want to score meaningless, imagined points on some joke of a forum, because no one in the real world will even engage with your nonsense Again you obviously don't want to be taken seriously

If there's an error in a binary code it won't work. Intersex people, as well as many other conditions that don't fit the binary are still functioning members of society. Destroyed my attempt to argue? Please. You still haven't even demonstrated you understand the word binary

That's exactly your argument, you're either taking out of both sides of your mouth, saying something is binary and at the same time saying the exact same thing can more then two options ( or have exceptions). That's like claiming to be a married bachelor. Can't happen Or maybe English isn't your first language Or maybe you have some holes in your epistemology (this one is for definitely true, I just don't know if it's intentional or not) But you're probably just so ideologically motivated by an issue you clearly don't grasp that you have no qualms about creating proprietary definitions to words in order to continue to spout you're short sighted world view. Don't you claim to be Christian? Isn't not lying a big part of your supposed dogma? Jesus won't be happy with you.

Nope You:, our apentiges are binary you're either born with two arms or no arms Me: Binary means it MUST be one or the other. So how many arms we have is as much binary as biological sex . Question what deviation is there in binary code that is not a 1 or a 0? Answer there isn't because that is what binary means, no exceptions. Drrrr English drrrrrr

1 ) "IF' was the operative word and my point was that it wouldn't matter if what you were saying is true, your language demonstrates you either don't want or can't participate in a good faith conversation. 2) case in point 3) you're right, I'm a terrible speller ( in all three languages I speak and you should have seen the confusion when I tried to spell things out in sign language to the hearing impaired) but I have spell check. You on the other hand are a grown man that has to resort to juvenile adhoms, partisan hackery and the REGUGITATING (another difference between us is I'm willing to learn, adapt and evolve in my understanding) of silly trops and memes But you keep using that kind of language, just realize that no one will ever take someone who can't discuss issues without insults seriously.

Oh jeez, I didn't realize how deep your ignorance goes, you don't even know what binary means. Bi =2 so by definition if there is an exception it can't be binary It's 1s or 0s not 1s, 0s and sometimes 73 Dude before trying to disprove established science at least learn English

Even if you actually had a point, the fact that the first word of your post was "Leftards" shows you have no interest in a really participating in a good faith conversations but simply to regergutate useless taking points.

Let's for the sake of argument say the theory of evolution (accepted by ostensibly the entire scientific community),is complete hog wash.You're still no further in proving biblical creation, nevermind the supernatural even exists and on top of that your specific flavor of the supernatural is the correct one. We could start there. P.S. I'm sorry but until they submit their findings to review creation.com has zero merit.