SkyHigh

This is a blatant lie

Most bigotry comes from ignorance, racist only run with those of the same color etc.. Now other bigotry often comes from repressed feeling, ie: homophobes are often latent homosexuals themselves etc.... You really are an numbskull. First never said white wasn't a race .News flash not all white people are white supremacists, therefore white supremacists are not a race but also an ethnic group. Did you know that in the early 1900s many people didn't consider the Irish to be "white"? Again you're simply a contrarian who has no other way to validate yourself but to make juvenile insults from behind a screen because no one else will listen to your ramblings. I was never trying to insult you, I was simply pointing out facts and the fact is your feeble attempts at retorts don't even meet the basic level needed to be effective. You have nothing but adhoms and grade school insults. I don't get upset when people that were never able to find jobs above minimum wage try and talk smack "Big mean person "? Please.Son you're a sad little man, you bore me, you're not clever and I have no interest in taking with people of bad faith. Take your time and read this well ( I know you have problems with comprehension of the written word) For the last time, Good Day I said Good Day

I said good day

Thank you for proving my point. You responded to a post not addressed to you to me with. "Jews are not a race" which I then explained that's not what I had said, you returned with a straw man saying " white is à race" which I never denied. You talk out your ass son So again I say Good Day sir

Your the only one talking about Hitler I'm laughing because out of one side of your mouth you're the "master race" and out the other side you seem to think you can be controlled by less than 0.2 of the population. Silly Nazis

I said ethnic group not race, but honestly sir I have no interest in dialogue with you as I find to be an uneducated contrarian, who argues from ignorance and opinion and often contradicts his own statements in the process of a conversation, who goal is only to score rhetorical and juvenile "points" and not to actually participate in good faith conversations. So I bid you good day

Always makes me laugh when white supremacists are so afraid of an ethnic group that represents like 0.15 of the world population. So worried that a few people in little hats can destroy white américain exceptionnelism. Sad

Reputable history books draw from tangible evidence and first hand , contemporary accounts, the bible has neither. If you choose to believe in the God of the Bible for moral or spiritual support, I encourage that. Period. Now claiming your chosen holy book, is a better representation of reality than any other holy book, or the combined cumulative understanding of virtually every field of academia, requires you to demonstrate that fact and all you've done is say the Bible is true because it says it's true and that is not logical Of course you're not going to argue about Genesis being false because you know it is. So you're not aware of any of the fields I mentioned? Let me drop a little ( grade 8 ) science on you. Note I have no formal science education but I am literate. Biology: we could not have the diversity of species based just on the timeline of the flood story, not to mention how did kangaroo's get from mont Ararat to Australia ? Genealogy: if you believe in paternity tests, you believe in evolution therefore Genesis must be false Archeology : No trace of millions of Jews walking a few hundred kilometers over 40 years Geology: the geological column dates rocks to millenia before the Bible says the universe was created. History: There was no mention of any part of the Exodus story in Egyptian writings a culture that kept very extensive records. Could you please respond directly or simply admit you believe on faith alone.

So still just some book said a thing? Nothing to support your assertion? You should read up about how the bible came to be. You won't look so ignorant P.P.S still waiting for a response to all the evidence that proves Genesis false You can pick any of the almost half dozen disciplines I listed above, science deniers choice.

Again you make the claim it's non-fiction, support that You can believe in anything you want but if all you have is a book written by anonymous authors , translated from copies of copies of translations, that claims ridiculous things like the Genesis creation account or the even more ridiculous idea of the flood, then I'm sorry but your god is as believable as Voldemort. P.S. you in no way addressed the mountains of evidence that completely contradict your "historical" , "holy" book

Real question. You made the claim the bible is non-fiction, being that our current understanding of biology, genealogy, archeology, geology, paleontology , history, etc, etc, etc... clearly show the events in Genesis ,from creation to the flood (that being the book we've been speaking about)as well as Exodus , did not happen as told in the Bible. Therefore the burden of proof falls to you, so again any evidence to support your assertion?

You claim the bible isn't fiction, any evidence to support that?

Ok, that's what I was hoping. Hahaha

Agreed, you have nothing to offer. You don't care about truth and you're not a real Christian.

I agree with your first point Don't really understand the Trudeau reference

So ... Some book says a thing. You don't seem to understand I don't believe in the bible, so using the bible to justify the bible is ridiculous. I could use the exact same logic to prove that Voldemort is true, the book says so. Do you now accept Voldemort? Of course you don't, why? For the exact same reason I don't accept your god.

How sad must ones life be to take time out of their day to defend Hitler. Pathetic

The mathematical improbability of 300, or 47, or even just eight fulfilled prophesies of Jesus stands as evidence to his messiahship. Prophecies of Jesus Although this list is not exhaustive, you'll find 47 messianic predictions clearly fulfilled in Jesus Christ, along with supporting references from the Old Testament and New Testament fulfillment. 47 Old Testament Verses About Jesus as Messiah Prophecies of Jesus Old Testament Scripture New Testament Fulfillment 1 Messiah would be born of a woman. Genesis 3:15 Matthew 1:20 Galatians 4:4 2 Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. Micah 5:2 Matthew 2:1 Luke 2:4-6 3 Messiah would be born of a virgin. Isaiah 7:14 Matthew 1:22-23 Luke 1:26-31 4 Messiah would come from the line of Abraham. Genesis 12:3 Genesis 22:18 Matthew 1:1 Romans 9:5 5 Messiah would be a descendant of Isaac. Genesis 17:19 Genesis 21:12 Luke 3:34 6 Messiah would be a descendant of Jacob. Numbers 24:17 Matthew 1:2 7 Messiah would come from the tribe of Judah. Genesis 49:10 Luke 3:33 Hebrews 7:14 8 Messiah would be heir to King David's throne. 2 Samuel 7:12-13 Isaiah 9:7 Luke 1:32-33 Romans 1:3 9 Messiah's throne will be anointed and eternal. Psalm 45:6-7 Daniel 2:44 Luke 1:33 Hebrews 1:8-12 10 Messiah would be called Immanuel. Isaiah 7:14 Matthew 1:23 11 Messiah would spend a season in Egypt. Hosea 11:1 Matthew 2:14-15 12 A massacre of children would happen at Messiah's birthplace. Jeremiah 31:15 Matthew 2:16-18 13 A messenger would prepare the way for Messiah. Isaiah 40:3-5 Luke 3:3-6 14 Messiah would be preceded by a forerunner. Malachi 3:1 Matthew 11:10 15 Messiah would be rejected by his own people. Psalm 69:8 Isaiah 53:3 John 1:11 John 7:5 16 Messiah would be a prophet. Deuteronomy 18:15 Acts 3:20-22 17 Messiah would be preceded by Elijah. Malachi 4:5-6 Matthew 11:13-14 18 Messiah would be declared the Son of God. Psalm 2:7 Matthew 3:16-17 19 Messiah would be called a Nazarene. Isaiah 11:1 Matthew 2:23 20 Messiah would bring light to Galilee. Isaiah 9:1-2 Matthew 4:13-16 21 Messiah would speak in parables. Psalm 78:2-4 Isaiah 6:9-10 Matthew 13:10-15, 34-35 22 Messiah would be sent to heal the brokenhearted. Isaiah 61:1-2 Luke 4:18-19 23 Messiah would be a priest after the order of Melchizedek. Psalm 110:4 Hebrews 5:5-6 24 Messiah would be called King. Psalm 2:6 Zechariah 9:9 Matthew 27:37 Mark 11:7-11 25 Messiah would enter Jerusalem on a donkey. Zechariah 11:12 Matthew 21:4-5 26 Messiah would be praised by little children. Psalm 8:2 Matthew 21:16 27 Messiah would be betrayed. Psalm 41:9 Zechariah 11:12-13 Luke 22:47-48 Matthew 26:14-16 28 Messiah's price money would be used to buy a potter's field. Zechariah 11:12-13 Matthew 27:9-10 29 Messiah would be falsely accused. Psalm 35:11 Mark 14:57-58 30 Messiah would be silent before his accusers. Isaiah 53:7 Mark 15:4-5 31 Messiah would be spat upon and struck. Isaiah 50:6 Matthew 26:67 32 Messiah would be hated without cause. Psalm 35:19 Psalm 69:4 John 15:24-25 33 Messiah would be crucified with criminals. Isaiah 53:12 Matthew 27:38 Mark 15:27-28 34 Messiah would be given vinegar to drink. Psalm 69:21 Matthew 27:34 John 19:28-30 35 Messiah's hands and feet would be pierced. Psalm 22:16 Zechariah 12:10 John 20:25-27 36 Messiah would be mocked and ridiculed. Psalm 22:7-8 Luke 23:35 37 Soldiers would gamble for Messiah's garments. Psalm 22:18 Luke 23:34 Matthew 27:35-36 38 Messiah's bones would not be broken. Exodus 12:46 Psalm 34:20 John 19:33-36 39 Messiah would be forsaken by God. Psalm 22:1 Matthew 27:46 40 Messiah would pray for his enemies. Psalm 109:4 Luke 23:34 41 Soldiers would pierce Messiah's side. Zechariah 12:10 John 19:34 42 Messiah would be buried with the rich. Isaiah 53:9 Matthew 27:57-60 43 Messiah would resurrect from the dead. Psalm 16:10 Psalm 49:15 Matthew 28:2-7 Acts 2:22-32 44 Messiah would ascend to heaven. Psalm 24:7-10 Mark 16:19 Luke 24:51 45 Messiah would be seated at God's right hand. Psalm 68:18 Psalm 110:1 Mark 16:19 Matthew 22:44 46 Messiah would be a sacrifice for sin. Isaiah 53:5-12 Romans 5:6-8 47 Messiah would return a second time. Daniel 7:13-14 Revelation 19 These and many other Old Testament verses about Israel's Messiah were fulfilled in the New Testament life of Jesus Christ. Collectively they form the leading proof of Christ's deity. As Jesus went about his ministry, he knew that he was fulfilling these prophecies, and therefore, used this knowledge to confirm his claims of being the Son of God in the flesh: unquote For the rest of the article: 47 Old Testament Prophecies About Jesus (learnreligions.com) So your whole argument is , some book says a thing. Sad

You can't use the bible to prove the Bible, this is primary school logic. You continue to show you have no interest in truth.

There is no evidence of the supernatural

I know the bible better than you. I've actually read it , you listen to con artist preachers "interpretations" only interested in making money, making claims about a book that they and you don't really care about the message of Jesus but just as a way to justify your bigotry and hatred. The Bible holds as much weight for me as the Koran, the Tora, the Vedas, etc .. NONE You freely admitted you use the bible to prove the Bible, an obvious logical fallacy. I know you're not very bright (this is proven by every post you make, you speak on religion, politics and science with an ignorance beyond the pale , because you willingly avoid any information that doesn't support your presupposed conclusions) . You are not someone that seeks truth, you're not even someone interested in attempting to understand the options of others. Therefore your opinion is equivalent to a flat earther, useless.

Anyone that starts a post with Alex Jones style conspiracy theories about the WEF, only shows that their opinion is worthless

Because I wasn't, read the literature. Wasting my time with that is equivalent to arguing with a flat earther about gravity. Did you actually look at what experts say. Of course I can be wrong, that's what the scientific method is based on. new information produces new conclusions. Now as far as the old testament, it hasn't changed in millenia and the people that can read those languages are almost entirely in agreement on the fact that Genesis (that includes Noah) was written in a metaphorical style. Not giving you a specific book or author in no way diminishes my assertion, just read.

Then why continue to pester me for my opinion when you could just go read what scholars say. Wikipedia will give you all you need, I checked the other day after our conversation, I just wanted to make sure that it was you that was more concerned about being argumentative than actually taking the time to look for yourself. And it was

That may be the most ignorant and illogical standard of reason I've ever heard. You should be ashamed of yourself.