SkyHigh

I would assume, though there may be more than one. Hahahaha I just googled it Robert Morris is his name

You know what? You're right Agreeing with you on anything, much less trying to find common ground with a pervert was not very intelligent. I guess stooping to your level makes it unavoidable to lower ones IQ , if only to be able to communicate on the primary school level of logic you operate under. You're not even fun to laugh at anymore because you just keep repeating things you know to be false. At least come up with some new nonsense so you're incoherent rants stay fresh.

I would say I agree with that, but still don't understand how it pertains to what I said. Could you please use specific examples taken directly from posts I made to better illustrate your point. I would suggest that part of the problem is you're reading my posts with preconceived ideas of what I'm trying to say, and some of your objections to the style (as you have not yet commented on substance) of what I say come from the fact that neither of us was truly trying to communicate in good faith but simply to one up each other.

Ones choice of account doesn't reflect on their moral values the same way your spiritual advisor does, I'm sure you'd agree

Citation please, not saying this is false I'm just unaware.

Ok I've specified this many times, the US doesn't have health care and again not my opinion it's that of the heritage foundation and the Frasier institute. If you're not even going to acknowledge my points I see no reason to continue

Yup, you're CUCKoo for MAGA coco puffs aka young girls

Again I agree you nimrod Problem is the Democrats are none of those things and by going off half cocked (because you're impotent) about nonsense, you're not addressing the actual problems with their actual policies and platform Now of course this is mainly because you're not at all a logically thinking, reasonable minded person. You are someone that wouldn't be able to put together a sound argument for anything even if It slapped you in the face then I wrote it down for you. You're just sad

Agreed , the idea was to illustrate the difference in proximity of the pedos to Trump (MAGA) as compared to Harris (D)

When I got here I would go as far as to say there was a clear conservative bias in the moderation(but at least there was moderation), lately though even that has seemed to disappear and is now basically a free for all

Sad

Dude, Trump's spiritual advisor, take that in for a second Trump's Spiritual Advisor recently admitted to inappropriate behavior with a minor. Not some random person with no actual ties to any party, but Trump's Spiritual Advisor. Do you not see how empty your silly accusations are?

Again you just prove your lack of understanding of the words you throw around so freely. Even if I grant your premise (which of course any reasonable person wouldn't) Black lives matter is not a labor movement, therefore nothing to do with Marxism (a political philosophy I still don't agree with). Seriously read some Marx you may come off like you're not a raving lunatic completely detached from reality (well at least on this issue) I guess that was before I came here

As much of a Marxist as Kamala, so not at all You really are a sad little impotent man

Of course I agree that "anarchistic freedom" is unattainable but I also assume that you agree that some restrictions on freedom are also necessary for a functioning society. As the saying goes "my freedom to swing my arms ends millimeters from your nose". I've mentioned the financial freedoms that our system promotes that the US system categorically doesn't offer. I used this topic as a jumping off point specifically as this came directly from a study produces by the Fraser institute and the heritage foundation two clearly conservative outlets one Canadian one American, so your side (again I have no side, other than maybe that of supporting my nation) agrees with me at least on this point. So other than property rights (an issue you'd agree is more complex than simply saying Canadians have none) and guns which is something that is really a non-issue for a strong majority of Canadians and also comes with many, many downsides (see mass shootings, accidental shootings (leading cause of death in children) and suicide) personally I've never needed or wanted a gun and I grew up in arguably some of the toughest parts of this country. So specifically what freedoms that do exist in the US do you feel don't in Canada?

Honestly, I still fail to see how my personal experiences and opinions as they relate to my short comings (writing ability) and my thoughts on why many people that lack exposure to other cultures (French québécois was my example) are more likely to be xenophobic, could be construed as partisan but as we have already agreed this is probably not the most substantial issue we could be discussing, let's move on So, in the interest of continuing this newfound civility between us, I invite you to select any topic you feel best represents your political philosophy and we shall discuss. EDIT: I will endeavor to do my best to refrain from using personal experience if you can commit to using the principal of charity whilst reading my attempts to express myself in a medium in which I admittedly am weak . Deal?

You don't find that definition ambiguous and open to interpretation ?

Triggered? Please No straws other than the ones you had to use to insolate your fridge box home Not a conservative either You weren't trashing Marxism because you don't understand Marxism, you were just throwing around some word that the ignorant people you support use because your side (and by that I mean the extremist Trump sycophants) that represent true conservatism about as well as the westboro baptist church represents the teachings of Jesus Sad little incel

The funniest part is that we both know (though you'll never admit it) that you will, and have depended on government safety nets (welfare, old age, etc..) to meet your basic needs more then I ever will. All you have is dishonesty, pathetic

You're just sad

Well since you're the one that brought up Marxism, I guess you're admitting that everything you say is pointless. They say that admittance is the first step to recovery, so at least you're on the right track

I completely agree that invoking personal experience as apposed to education etc.. is not the correct way to engage in political discourse, but I don't think that's what I did. I spoke of my personal story, only with the intention to explain my struggles to properly express myself in the written form and to clarify that if something comes out the wrong way that it will most likely be because of form and not function. I am still confused as to how anything I said could be construed as hackery (I'm not saying it wasn't, just that if it was, it was unintentional) so would you please tell me specifically what I did say (or how I said it) that gave you that impression. I think we have started to develop something resembling a respectful conversation, so if you can just answer my last question. You can pick the next topic for discussion.

Are you saying that the health care systems in the states are comparable to those in Canada ? I just checked and 54% of Americans get employment based health care. So at least half of Americans can't leave their jobs if themselves or their family has any kind of health issues, not to mention some that couldn't even make lateral moves to other businesses if any of those health issues involve pre existing conditions, and honestly I feel you've not addressed my point. I agree our government bureaucracy is bloated and the unions have way to much power, so that's not a point of contention between us at all I don't think freedom is an objective word but if you provide me with your definition, I'm fine with using that as our working definition going forward I'm not a fan of Justin either, so we can agree on that as well, therefore using current liberals (and their policies) as some sort of counter point to any subjects I may bring up (well presented or if I need to clarify better) is really just a waste of time for both of us I'm not partisan, so I don't care about what any political party platform is, I evaluate each specific issue independently based on how I feel it will effect me and society as a hole

You don't have an honest bone in your body. And straight back to calling me a leftist. You're a complete joke I will no longer be responding to you in the future You're pathetic.

And that is what separates us , you are satisfied with faith to guide you in your decisions, I prefer to use reason and logic. I respect your beliefs but the gap between our epistemologies is so insurmountable, I see no reason to continue in any form of future communication. I wish you nothing but positivity Take care