SkyHigh

You really have nothing to say do you? Call me a left wing lunatic without even an iota of evidence, then proceed to pepper me with questions and the best you can do is play semantics? You talk about logic with zero understanding of what it actually means. You're a sad little man. I know you're trying to own the libs(because you have nothing else) but all you're really doing is making a fool of yourself but then again, that's about all Trump and his supporters do , talk nonsense without ever actually offering any real solutions or even anything resembling rational, intelligible discours.

Believe you me, I don't. He's just a contrarian that thinks that juvenile, petty insults on some random anonymous forum makes him a big man. Today was fun though, I had him defending Trudeau. Hahaha

If you can't find Trudeau saying that it would be the last "first past the post" or FPP election ,since you obviously didn't understand because that's all I've been talking about this whole time. Well? I don't know what to tell you

What are you talking about, there are minimum levels based on seats in the house not based on popular vote and it is of course at the discretion of the government to add members of other parties to commissions. You should get off your high "horse" because everyone else can see it's just an old, tired, broken down, jackass

First the system that was "unpopular" was not the system he sold to the voters and not the system they thought they were getting. I said Politicians exaggerate their plans , you went on to argue the sincerity of campaign promises. One of the major reasons the PQ did so poorly in the last election is they put the question of sovereignty aside going against one of the founding principles of the party. That the leader of said party says he's going to hold a referendum to garnish votes, in no way implies that either Quebecers want to separate, or that there's even a chance of an actual referendum. But no you're logic is sound and I'm definitely the one lacking the intellectual capabilities to carry on this conversation. Si on veut vraiment parler de les enjeux de Québec on devrait le faire en français, oh wait j'ai oublié vous êtes même pas capable de communiquer dans la langue de la majorité du peuple vous prétendez comprends.

Just to be clear, your contention is that the neo-liberal head of Canada's "natural governing party" who enters every federal election with a distinct advantage was sincere about making it harder for his party to be elected? And more importantly having a majority?

He ran on proportional representation, then proposed nothing more than a modified FPP model (he didn't even set up the parliamentary commission based on the popular vote of the election that had just happened). Those that are proponents of election reform are mostly leftists from fringe parties and the idea that they were content with how Trudeau handled that is ludacris at it's face But please continue arguing for Justins integrity, I find it amusing

That's why I was so offended by you calling me American, your just racist against people who enjoy the delicacy of some delectable Jr mints But to quote a great Canadian band "American women stay away from me"

I used to go to a pool hall that accepted Canadian tire money but that was in Onterible

Let's test your assertion. Do you believe Trudeau Jr ever had the intention of reforming the electoral process out the FPP système ?

Lévêque used the term sovereignty association didn't even like the nam Parti Québécois. He thought it exclusive

So all just your opinion. I spoke of the words used by the two politicians that lead the référendums. You reply with , lying scum bags (well actually you said scud?) Right because to take everything a politician says at face value

Ok you really are looking for a fight. Hahaha Be careful I still go home to Toronto sometimes

Seriously though, how can you be against Jr mints? Perfect snack at the movies

Even Pariseau (an actual indépendantistes) wanted a pan-canadian legislature. It's more about provincial autonomy than actual succession

That's just because the softcore nationalists are dissuaded with Frankie and the QAC and they're (PQ) giving them a soft place to land. Believe it or not sometimes politicians exaggerate their plans in order to attract a certain part of the electorate. There in lies the problem, people who don't speak the language and are ignorant to the particularities of Quebec politics, make up this fantasy world painting tout les Québécois with the same brush. Facts don't care about your feelings

Now you got beef with junior mints? Thems fightin words!

Don't confuse the PQ blowing smoke up the hard liners asses, with the political will of the people to embark on that journey. If you actually look into the two previous référendums. The first one in Lévêque knew they would lose and just just did to appease the more militant members and Bouchard admitted the second one was just a negotiating tactic and had no desire to succeed and that is verifiable by simply reading the question.

I honestly think there are very few issues that need be viewed on the left/right paradigm (particularly in Canada where we have Néolibérale and progressive Conservatives) Those that see everything black or white, in my experience lack knowledge (willfully or not) on whatever the situation they happen to be facing. And sheep pills are not only nutritious but also delicious, don't knock em.

Personally, it saddens me greatly Politically, I'm on the bodily autonomy side, not my business what someone decides to do with their own body and I think it's beyond the scope and mandate of the government to regulate such things. As much as it pains me to say Hillary got it right with "rare but safe"

Dead is dead and the resurrection story in the Bible clearly states Jesus was dead. Still I could have mentioned the fact that the Bible says that π is 3.0, or the fact that we know that the flood story, tower of babble and the Exodus stories are complete fabrications.

I'm not your therapist son, not my job to talk you down from your delusional fantasies. Go see a professional I'm sure there's some medication that can help.

You really have nothing to say do you. You called me a right wing lunatic but can't even show one example, ask me a question and then ignore my answer, then go off because a Canadian doesn't care about the politics of another country. Sad The Bible says someone raised from the dead, have you ever seen that happen in real life? Of course you haven't because people don't come back from the dead. So again you show you just talk out your ass because you have nothing of substance in your sad little empty partisan head. Son

I don't

First off I care very little about the farsical circus that is American politics and even less about the two senile septuagenarians candidates running to be your president As far the court cases against Trump, I have no idea about "every single indictment against Trump" again I have a life. As far as the timing, of course it's political. The man has been cheating on his wives and taxes for decades and nobody cared. Now do I care if a conman gets punished for legitimate or doubtful crimes? Not really they got Capone for tax evasion. Now a test for you, can you be honest and admit that this whole day you've been talking out your ass about what I believe because all you got is tired partisan talking points and can't actually defend your nonsense without resorting to logical fallacies (did you Google what that means yet?) Balls in your court son.