SkyHigh

That's what I thought

Or you could just say it right now

Apologies if I missed that I'm all ears now

Yes every response, you've had to admit it multiple times in this conversation. Nope, all I was doing is pointing out your obsession with the genitals of children, again creepy. So you don't know any biology above a grade school level, understood. Biologists that have any post secondary education understand that even sex is not binary. Unless you don't believe in intersex people? and that's only a small example of the complexity of biology.

Nope, I said nothing from creation.com is worth considering, as it openly and without shame admits they don't follow the scientific method. They have already decided what they believe and cherry pick things that comport to their presuppositions. And implying that anyone purposely won't look at things that contradict their personal views from you is rich. You have said yourself you have no need to read anything published by accepted science to the point you literally denied that there were people that studied evolutionary biology.

You've been intentionally dishonest in ever response you've given me Incontrovertible evidence? Really Don't know how many times I have to say I'm against it but you just keep pretending I'm advocating for genital mutilation. I'd be interested to see if you would be able to explain that yourself anywhere above a high school level

Well they do come by it "honestly", most that have a problem with it, claim to be Christian and their God has had a fetish for genital mutilation since Abraham. Trading foreskins for favors is basically gods bread and butter

I only try to be serious with serious people, you are not. It's not an insult, I honestly believe people that pay that much attention to "trans influencers" are repressing their sexual desires. I like every other straight guy (and girl for that matter) I know don't talk or even think about trans people. As far as medical decisions that should be between health care professionals and their patients and the protection of minors is the responsibility of legislators.

Ok chuckles, you believe I'm lying about not having known Dylan Mulvaney if that helps you cope with your repressed sexual desires but don't worry I'll support you either way

No you either don't read what I write because you're not an honest interlocutor, or you're purposely lying because you can't use your normal trops to address a more nuanced point of view. No, sex reassignment surgery is not preformed on minors.

Right , I'm sure you keep track of all the visitors to the white house and have been religiously following the vice presidents twitter. Hmmmm, funny she never came up on anything I read or watch until a private company promoted someone that the supposed free market, freedom loving people didn't like and boycotted a "beer" company. Yet you're saying you've been following her for a while. Interesting Dude read! I literally wrote with or without parental consent. If you just have to make shit up whole cloth,I no longer find you interesting

Straight to obfuscation because you can't actually respond to my points And you're lying, you said the Bible was non fiction I asked for support. What I said was that if you can't back up your assertion and can only say it's true because it says it's true, then by the exact same logic, I can say Voldemort is real because the book says it is, or better yet let's use Homer's odyssey, that predates the bible

That's exactly what you were trying to do , it failed. You would have had to seek out Mulvaney ( again random trans YouTubers have never come up on my suggestion list and I watch a lot of YouTube) Taylor Swift is everywhere from Forbes to sports center. Semantics ? Jeez you're sad Let me make it clear. Children should NEVER undergo any kind of sex reassignment surgery ever, with or without parental consent. Period. And I have never met anyone who doesn't agree completely with that statement. Your problem, that's a made up issue that does not happen Seriously though you should stop thinking about children's genitals so much, it's really creepy

It also allows us to recognize the lack of moral character in those whom profit in the demonization of fringe people and hopefully,one day people will come to the realization that that sort of person should not be promoted to positions of power or prestige.

Are you really comparing one of the biggest recording stars in history, dating one of the best players on the defending Superbowl Championship team with some niche YouTuber ? That doesn't even warrant a retort The rest of what you wrote is gibberish A) I nor anyone I know is "for" mutilating the genitals of minors. Period B ) Even if they were "for it" the lawS ,(plural, meaning there are redundancies set up) prevent things like that.

So you counter with another ridiculous non issue again referenceing men that dress like women? I say you doth protest too much. Funny enough, you would have to have the same problem with children reading Shakespeare, seeing that he was famous for casting men in female roles. Better not let the kids watch anything with Dustin Hoffman, Patrick Swayze, Wesley Snipes, the Wayan brothers, etc, etc, etc either, might turn them gay Do not see how silly you sound?

You're proving my point I didn't know her because I don't obsess about a community that represents less than 0.1%of the population. Again, why would you? Wait I know, repressed sexual desires

Unfortunately it's often the professed christians that lack knowledge of the Bible and Christianity. So when one of the many glaring contradictions are pointed out they're forced to hide behind silly statements like "they use the bible when they don't believe the bible" or "they just don't understand the "true" meaning or the context of the Bible" These are simply tactics used to officiate in order to not respond directly to things in the Bible that go against the reality we all (christians, atheists, muslims, hindu, etc ..) share.

First not a "liberal" at least in the way you would define it, but anyway here's an example. I had never heard of Dylan Mulvaney until conservatives started blowing up bud light cans. Seriously though, it's ok to have those feelings, don't be afraid to be your authentic self. You'll feel better about yourself in the long run.

Hmmm, seems "conservatives" are the ones always talking about trans people. I think it's just repressed sexual desires y'all have problems coming to terms with, you appear to be a perfect example of the issue

It's called an internal critique. One does not have to believe in their interlocutors meta physics to show the logical fallacies there in. Using the bible( or any holy book someone believes in) to show the ignorance of the belief system is a completely valid form of argumentation. I can call out L Ron Hubbard on his bull without getting audited.

Well,to be fair only all the ones he doesn't pay for their company.

Oh , I thought you were pro-life.

With all due respect, the videos you have provided in the past have never featured speakers that were qualified in the field they were pontificating on, so they should not be considered as educational tools and honestly not worth my time. Here's why. The goal of the scientific process and therefore scientists in general is to try and disprove everything we think we know. The websites you link to, such as creation.com admittedly do not use the scientific method, they approach to topic with a fixed conclusion and try to find evidence to support their presuppositions. Do you know Professor Dave explains? It's a YouTube channel, take an honest look at him then we can continue this conversation

Thank you for your honesty It is true that science does not presently have a definitive hypothesis on the origins of life it self and many scientists still hold to some version of evolutionary creation in that some deity ( let's use your god for the purpose of this conversation) was the "first mover" but that has nothing to do with the theory of evolution by natural selection You are also correct that Darwin was unaware of modern scientific discoveries (which is why today only creationists still use the term Darwinism) ie; DNA but these more recent revelations only corroborate and support Darwins original hypothesis making evolution one of the best supported theories in science, being used to provide substantial progress in everything from medicine to the petrol industry.