Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Shady

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    21,893

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    140

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Shady

  1. Shady

    SCOTUS: Abortion is none of our business, and so we revert the issue back to the states.

    The Left:  hOw dARe YoU!!!

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      No, but a state is now free to restrict contraception if they deem life to begin at fertilization. Same with IVF. 

      The right to own a gun doesn't mean a right to carry one concealed. When the constitution was written, only long guns existed, so they couldn't consider a concealed handgun. 

      Just like they couldn't consider a medical procedure to end an unwanted pregnancy. 

    3. sharkman

      sharkman

      Nice soapbox.

    4. Boges

      Boges

      Nice non-rebuttal. 

  2. Shady
    You mean after the game? On a voluntary basis?
  3. Shady

    My immune system my choice.

    1. Show previous comments  10 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      If they make getting or giving an abortion a felony, they certainly are forcing a rape victim to have the child. 

      When was not getting the vaccine ever criminalized? 

    3. sharkman

      sharkman

      1)They didn’t  make abortions illegal.  They said it should be up to each State.  Don’t like the State laws?  Vote in some change, that’s democracy.

      2) Most rape victims don’t get pregnant.  Why must you lefties go after a subset of a subset of a subset to support your idiotic positions?  What about all women, what’s best for 100% of women?

       

    4. Boges

      Boges

      The hypocrisy of the court is that they stepped in a few days earlier saying that New York couldn't restrict concealed weapons. So the national rights of a gun-owner supersede that of a woman who doesn't want to be pregnant. 

      Also most abortions aren't late-term. Doesn't stop Pro-lifers to use that as justification for calling it murder. 

  4. Shady

    Pro-life group fire bombed by pro-abortionists.

    1. Michael Hardner

      Michael Hardner

      If you are pro-life then this response is entirely consistent.

      The extremists are ready to right.  

    2. sharkman

      sharkman

      Just wait until antifa gets rolling. Because we know the Biden administration will allow rioting, destruction of property and the attacks on citizens who happen to get in the way.  Good thing the Rittenhouse case illustrates that Americans can still defend themselves.
       

      BTW, it’s against the law to demonstrate around judges homes in Washington DC.

    3. betsy

      betsy

      There goes...............law and order.

  5. Shady
    Yes, Eyeball has not laid out in detail how his plan would work. Would an MP have to notify some agency if they're at a lunch with a lobbyist? Would they have to stream the conversation online or something so that the public can listen in? I just don't get the logistics of so-called in camera lobbying.
  6. Shady
    Aren’t there already laws against corruption? Some people are caught, some aren’t. I still haven’t heard of any workable solution.
  7. Shady
    You haven’t proposed how to enact any of this. Once again, how do you propose having the public listen in on conversations that take place in restaurants, bars, sporting events, coffee shops etc? Please provide details.
  8. Shady
    The party of science! ?
  9. Shady
    But it’s unworkable. How do you propose the public listens in on conversations at bars, restaurants, sporting events etc?
  10. Shady
  11. Shady
    That’s completely unworkable. So you want the public invited to say a dinner between two people at a restaurant? Or somebody’s living room? Or at a bar? Or hockey game? Lobbying is just talking. You can’t ban talking or somebody advocating on behalf of their industry. Now, if money or goods changed hands, that would be illegal. Those laws already exist. The real solution is to make the government’s involvement, and impact on various industries much less significant.
  12. Shady
    What’s not scientific about? Be specific.
  13. Shady
    What’s not scientific about it?
  14. Shady
    You don’t have to believe me. Just take a look at a 3D ultrasound. It’s quite something when they turn up the volume as well, and you can listen to the tiny heart beating. Sometimes you can even watch the unborn child sucking it’s thumb.
  15. Shady
    If you’re going to continue to deny prenatal science, then there’s really no point in carrying on this conversation.
  16. Shady
    An earthworm isn’t human. Humans don’t produce earthworms. According to the laws of genetics, humans produce other humans. You’re becoming unhinged. Take a deep breath and calm down.
  17. Shady
    You’re still not making any sense or any substantive point regarding an unborn baby with a beating heart etc. Recognizing prenatal science is paramount to understanding the issue.
  18. Shady
    You’re not making any sense again.
  19. Shady
    Cowardice has nothing to do with somebody’s fundamental rights. It’s irrelevant. Either is caring, or pretending to care about human life. What I care about or pretend to care about is also irrelevant.
  20. Shady
    Exactly. They pick and choose when medical privacy exists.
  21. Shady
    You mean the 0.000000001% of abortions that constitute this example? I’m all for that exception. 99.9% of people are.
  22. Shady
    You’re not making any sense. Unborn babies, with heartbeats, etc, that feel pain, are the issue. Super intrusive? You mean like the government forcing you to inject chemicals into your body? Then having to prove publicly that you had said chemicals injected into your body to go to the grocery store, or to keep your job. Get the eff outta here.
  23. Shady
    How are real women going to die? What’s a real women anyways? Are there fake women? Are you referring to trans women or something?
  24. Shady
    Abortion kills women every single day. Unborn women. Regardless, overturning Roe v Wade doesn’t ban abortion. Roe v Wade isn’t a law. Overturning it means that it will be regulated the same way other rights are regulated. Like speech, second amendment, etc. At least half of the country will see no change. A quarter more will see some change, but abortion will remain legal up to a certain point. Only a handful of states, but probably none, might ban abortion outright. Someone looking to have an abortion will just need to find a neighbouring state to have the procedure. Furthermore, Democrats had the chance to codify abortion into actual law several times and chose not to. There’s literally a bill that’s been sitting in committee for almost a year that Democrats have never brought to a vote. Instead, they’ve been lazy, and relied on a 50 year old abortion ruling that was based on privacy, not body autonomy. But it’s nice to see that medical privacy and body autonomy are once again a thing now! Funny how that worked.
  25. Shady
    It goes to show how radical the far left has become.
×
×
  • Create New...