WestCanMan

Of course the NDP sold out, this was their only moment of actual relevance since Singh has been their leader. All Trudeau had to tell Singh was "There will be many more moments like this where you get to puff up your chest and be the man" and Singh was putty in his hands. It was a win-win for both parties - Trudeau got to give away billions of dollars and stay in his position of Grand Poohbah of Covid, Singh got to act like the socialist king - just giving money away for nothing. In the end the Bloc & PCs got stronger because they stood up to Trudeau, and the NDP got stronger because they proved that they want to give money away faster than the Liberals, and Trudeau is just like a junkie now, mooching the very last penny off of everyone that still hasn't learned that they're being used.

Biden doesn't surface 'til around noon, he only does one-to-three speaking engagements per week for an hour or less, he has only taken a few cherry-picked questions from friendly faces in the months since he has been nominated, and yet he didn't have the endurance to stay coherent in the limited time that he has been speaking. If there's another Benghazi or worse, he won't have the endurance to stay in the hotseat for 18 hours a day. He won't do 2 solid hours in a day. He's done. At this stage in Biden's life he's just trying to remember to use the toilet, and I'll be surprised if he's not wearing depends during the debate. I still give the debate no more than a 25% chance of happening. The only place where Biden's voters have any enthusiasm is at a smashed-in WalMart.

Who needs polls any more after you've successfully incorporated every voter-fraud-friendly system known to man? Now It's time to stuff some fake ballots and ditch the ballots from GOP-friendly areas. The Dems are poised to win every county in the US.

It's not happening because of Trump. This is the same racial division that the Obamas were pushing when they were in the WH, this is the same rioting and looting from 2014-2016. WTF makes you think that these riots are Trump's fault? Just 'cause CNN said so? Lol. I never thought it was funny when Charlie Brown trie to kick the football for the 50th time. I don't think it's funny when people believe CNN's 50th consecutive lie.

I didn't watch it, I already knew what he was going to say: "Here's money, Canadians are scum, kill the oil sands, Canada will suddenly become a manufacturing hub because of Green technology, it's amazing that black people still exist when you consider how fast the cops in Innisfail are killing them, wear masks unless you're rioting."

Sorry to say but your idiotic and unsubstantiated allegations only score points in the virtue-signalling competition inside your head d. You never bested anyone in real life. At best all that you did here was prove that you don't really understand the topic at hand. Don't worry though, your fellow leftists aren't hung up on trivial facts like that.

All Dem voters, through and through. CNN's response to this is "WHITE MEN ARE THE BIGGEST TERRORIST GROUP IN AMERICA!!!! LOOK OUT, THERE ARE SOME CRACKERS HEADED THIS WAY NOW! THEY'RE PROBABLY JUST KILLING SOME BLACK PEOPLE ON THEIR WAY TO OR FROM WORK!"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-calls-breonna-taylor-death-the-result-of-the-system-after-officer-indictment Here's an example of the Dems going along with CNN's hideous narrative. FWIW, the proof that the police knocked is here, the guy who shot the cop even testified that he heard a knock but still thought it was a break-in. He probably thought that he needed to defend himself with a gun because of Brionna's recent involvement with a crack dealer.

I watched about 15 minutes of CNN's coverage last night, they're doing all they can to get some Breonna riots started. 1) They constantly talk about the no knock warrant that was issued for her place, but they don't mention that the police knocked and announced their presence anyways. That's what the police reported, and a witness independently reported the same thing. 2) They ignore the fact that Brionna's name was actually on the warrant as a suspect. 3) They ignore the fact that the main person of interest in the crack-dealing listed Brionna's place as his residence. 4) They constantly talk like she was lying in bed when she was shot. I literally thought that was the case until yesterday. She was in the hallway when she got shot. 5) They constantly mention 'shoddy detective work' but they don't cite examples of that. 6) In addition to all this, is the fact that they insist that racism was a main factor in this case, and that's pure, fear-mongering, disgusting filth. They say "she was in her home, that should be her sanctuary" but we all understand that if we're crack dealers, or if we have boyfriends/girlfriends/spouses who are crack dealers, we are in danger of a strong police intervention. The main thing that they do to incite rioting though, is constantly set the tone for the arrest as "No knock, barge in, Brionna's in her bed, her crack-dealer ex doesn't liver with her anymore, she gets killed by racists". That whole story is a mixture of CNN/BLM lies and debunked myths, and it glosses over the main facts like "she lived with a crack dealer until just recently, she was still involved with him, she recently moved packages for him, a cop was shot at her door after knocking and announcing that they were police.....". CNN just wants riots, period. They are pure filth and their viewers are completely worthless morons.

No one has to get hurt lol.

There you go again; pontificating, virtue-signalling, and making baseless accusations when you should be learning.

I broke your post into two parts, both of which show your complete lack of understanding of this issue. 1) they're not both 'groups of refugees'. That's a simple fact that you'll understand when you look up the definition of refugee. 2) Did Canadians fear Jews because the Jews in Germany in 1938-'45 had a long & recent reputation for committing large-scale terrorist attacks? Did Canadians fear the German Jews because at that point in time, the Jewish population in Germany was committing genocide against a minority population there, and a large segment of the German-Jewish population were dedicated to the downfall of western society? I wasn't aware of that. I don't think anyone is aware of that. If you could just prove that, that would be great.

No reaching, no drama, not off-topic. Favouritism was giving people refugee status when they were just displaced by war. For your edification, a refugee is: We gave refugee status to people who were in no danger of being massacred, they just wanted out (quite sensibly), but they weren't actually refugees. Christians and Yazidis were the actual refugees in Syria. They were the ones being persecuted [murdered en masse, and forced into rape slavery - that's at the exact extreme end of persecuted]. Those are the actual facts of the matter. Facts. I applaud anyone with the sense to want to get away from the type of people who formed islamic state, and I feel sympathy for the people whose home was destroyed by them, but any compassionate person would understand the need to treat actual refugees like refugees and to treat people displaced by war like people displaced by war. What you're doing here is actually just talking about your feelings, which isn't important, and pandering to a culture that's a minority here so that you can scramble up onto a pedestal of moral & ethical superiority. Problem is that you're just chasing windmills - you're not actually the champion of a great cause you're just flying in the face of truth for cheap brownie points. If your family was facing genocide in Syria, you'd really NEED to get out of there, and I would expect/demand that our country would do everything within our power to get you all out. If you were merely a part of the culture that was committing genocide, and you wanted to get out, I would hope that the families who were facing genocide were evacuated ahead of yours. This simply isn't true. The al-quds day hate rallies here are a perfect example of that. People who advocate for genocide weren't refugees, they were a part of the problem, and they are not welcome in Canada and you should agree with that. If you're being honest you'll also acknowledge that there wasn't just a small amount of people in Syria who wanted to commit genocide. There were enough of them to forge a large country in an area where there were tens of thousands of soldiers fighting them with modern military technology. That means that : there was a massive group of people there who were so dedicated to the cause of genocide that they were willing to put their lives on the line to fight for it. Behind that group is an even larger group of people who support that genocide but are just too weak or scared to fight along with them, or whose job was to raise their children and to honour their heroism. Again, if you're being honest, you'll acknowledge that the leader of those repugnant maggots told them to 'mingle with the wave of refugees so that they can get into the soft areas of the western world to spread their hideous ideology and to commit terrorist attacks there'. Our PM dipped deep into the pool of potential terrorists and brought tens of thousands of people to our country with almost no vetting. If there's something that I said that you feel is inaccurate I'd love to hear exactly what it is.

Trump may have played this SCJ nomination wrong. He could have guaranteed the full support of all his voters if that seat was open, and on the other side, voter apathy was bound to be a huge problem for the Dems because no one really wants to plug their nose long enough to vote for Joe, SCJ seat or not. The Dems can really eliminate voter apathy from the equation with this issue though. Their idiots are riled up up like crazy. Trump has to get this done now, because if he fails he looks bad and he'll lose the election, even without Dems resorting to cheating.

The Dems land all of their body blows with baseless accusations, and Trump is pretty good at dishing out I told ya so's when the dust finally settles and the truth is out. People who support the President get tired of seeing the Dems lying about everything regarding the President, combined with their absolute failure to acknowledge the things that he has done really well on. Sentiments like "Suleimani was a beloved father figure among Iranians" and "Peace agreements between Israel and other countries in the middle east is no big deal" don't sit will with anyone who has more than half a brain lol. Trump's record in the middle east is getting a shining star from muslims and Jews alike. The only people who don't se that are the Dems.

Candace is great, it would be interesting to see what would happen if she ran. I'd also like to see Dinesh D'Souza or Ben Shapiro run, just because I'd love to see someone try to win a debate against either of them. Can you imagine a debate between Biden and Shapiro? LMAO, it would like a fight between a pit-bull and a rabbit. He speaks too fast for Biden to even have a clue what he was talking about. DeSantis in Fla will be a really strong candidate if he ever runs, imo. He's a solid conservative in a state that's generating really high support from the latino community. Gaetz or Jordan would be really strong candidates too.

Why is it that every time I challenge a Dem sycophant to come up evidence of what they pretend to know, they always come up with blanks? They just know that Fox News only tells lies 24/7, but they can't find a single specific example. I've posted thousands of actual lies by CNN on this site, no one has disproven anything I wrote about CNN's lying, but people still regurgitate their drivel. "The Dems go high" is a common refrain from Demmies, but I have never seen an example of it. I have plenty of examples of them slithering through the gutter though. It's a daily occurrence. When was the last time a Dem "went high" on any issue?

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/president Col, Minn and NM are the only only real 'fly-over' states that were blue. Illinois is the only other state that went blue that's in the middle of America and 3/4 of the population of Illinois is in the Chicago MSA. There are about 23 red states that would be considered 'fly-over' states. With a final tally of red 23-3 blue, fly-over states are not "blue". Here's a pretty cool page. It has maps of which party won, by county, and maps that shows how much each county was won by. The Dems won by a very large margin in a few places, the GOP won almost everywhere, but by much smaller margins. https://brilliantmaps.com/2016-election-map-population/

LMAO. You can't even name one time in the last 6 years that "the Dems went high", can you? That's a myth. Michelle Obama panders to racists and rioters every chance she gets. The Dems call violent protests where police and innocent bystanders are attacked "mostly peaceful". 2 billion dollars worth of damage and dozens of people murdered = mostly peaceful. Gerry Nadler said that the rioting in Portland was a myth, after it had been going on for 100 days. People there went to the extent of cementing doors shut and trying to start the building on fire. But it's a myth. There's a mob of people starting fires to blame on global warming and the Dems are backing that careless destruction up. How different is BC from Washington state? Where are our fires? How do they just stop at the 49th parallel? The Dems don't "go low", they "stay low". You didn't see dirty politics in all the lying about Russian collusion? You didn't see any dirty politics in the Kavanaugh confirmation? That's pathetic. The Dems couldn't have been any sleazier or any dirtier. In case you forget, when Avanatti came out with a girl who claimed to have gone to "10 parties where Kavanaugh and his buddies gang-raped girls" he became an overnight sensation in the Dem world. That was literally THE DUMBEST STORY I ever heard in my life, but the Dem voters are so ridiculously stupid that they just gobbled it up like pigs at the trough. Brain Stelter from CNN said that Avanatti was likely to be a future leader of the entire Dem party lol. That's stupid AF.

It's a total answer. The Dems have done nothing but lie and slither for 30 years. They told dozens of unforgivable lies just on the Kavanaugh confirmation alone, and you want me to care that Lindsey Graham is going back on his word from 4 years ago? LMAO. FYI the worst kind of lying there is, is fabricating to malign the character of another human being. That type of lying is at the very core of who the Dems are. They did it to Kavanaugh, they did it to Trump, they did it to Carter Page, they did it to Flynn, they are still doing it to police officers on a daily basis. Almost nothing that you think you know is true, mainly because you believe what you watch on CNN. It doesn't matter how many times you get caught propagating lies, you still go back to the same source. It's not even funny anymore. You're lying again. The Dems just lacked the power they needed to insert a non-constitutional judge to the SC. They couldn't turn the SC into a dictatorship modelled after the 9th circuit. Boo hoo. 1) The Dems ONLY cater to large-city voters. They have always alienated the fly-over people, but that's what it takes to get the big city voters. It's a choice they made themselves. 2) The Liberals in Canada lost the popular vote in 2019 too. What's your point? Their brand of politics is for reasonable, intelligent people who don't like being lied to. It's for common-sense, democratic, law-abiding, hard-working people. The Dems cater to low-income, cop-hating, socialism-loving, lazy people who are just unhappy with a life where they have to take some responsibility for their own successes or failures. Honestly if you're a lazy, worthless dolt who didn't try in school, you don't work hard enough to keep a decent job, and you think that you should just be able to commit crimes to get what you need or you feel like the people who actually worked hard all their lives should pay your way then you're a Democrat. If you work hard and you've always been responsible for your family and with your money, and you don't need to steal to earn a living, then you're a Republican. If the GOP way of life is going out of style then America is screwed. I'll name some names, you try to tell me that even one of these people isn't a worthless scumbag: Pelosi Schiff AOC Nadler M. Waters Hirono Omar Biden H Clinton All those people are hideous liars, through and through. I honestly wouldn't hire any of them to run a taco truck. You try stacking any one of those people up against any one of Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz or Trey Gowdy and tell me that you honestly think that they're even in the same league in terms of class, integrity, intelligence or any other measure of virtue. Name any CNN talking head and stack them up against Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, or even some conservatives who don't have a bigtime gig yet, like Candace Owens or Ben Shapiro. Let's count their lies and their idiotic comments. I know you won't take the bait because you already know that you've lost, bigtime. To this day you still can't find fault with anyone on Fox News but you write them off as liars because that's what CNN told you to do, and you refuse to think for yourself. To this day you won't name a single CNN talking head that you think has any integrity at all. I know that you won't pick a Dem off that list and vouch for them because you know that they're all scum, just like I said. The election is not about policy, it's about snakes & liars vs Americans, ad you know that every single Dem I named there is a snake and a liar or you haven't been paying attention.

To be honest, RBG was an SCJ in name only for the last year+. She was too sick to work and she should have resigned a long time ago. This is an appointment that should have been done last year.

Do you notice that all the leftists avoid this topic like the plague? They know why this happened but they'll never admit to it.

So you think that Canadian culture is the best culture on earth? I actually don't think you have it in you to say that.

She's like the poster thing for the Democrat party.

The Dems broke from norms of adulthood 30 years ago and they never looked back. Their attacks on Bork, Kavanaugh and Thomas were the absolute worst of human behaviour. The Dems can't give anyone anything right now, but seeing as they already opined that maybe there need to be 6 more judges on the SC, what if the GOP wins the election and keep control of the senate? The SC could be 12-3 in favour of the GOP. How do you like them apples? The Dems are worthless scum.