WestCanMan

Ignore the left4rd clowns.. This is just their usual bs: "EVWEEFING DAT BAD BAD TWUMPO DO IZ WONG, MOMMY 😭!!!" The US is even stepping into the insurance gig in the Strait of Hormuz, and that didn't just start yesterday. They were talking about Iran possibly mining the strait or attacking shipping there since the very beginning. THIS WAS NEVER GOING TO BE A PERFECT WAR WITH NO COLLATERAL DAMAGE OR CASUALTIES, dummies. But it's still going better than expected.

The two mainstream leftist personalities with the ability to think/speak across party lines on occasion. In a world that's becoming FAR too polarized, at least those guys can sometimes sway towards reason and logic.

Stop weaselling. YOU turned this transvestite topic into a main thrust of this thread, no one else I gave you the opportunity to explain your "conservatives are stripping rights away from people" comment and you ran away screaming sandbox insults like a child. Just man up and admit that conservatives did no such thing and we can close off this side-topic.

Here's a thought exercise: name ANYONE ON EARTH who has as many 180° shifts in their policy as Mark Carney does on a regular basis. "Elbows up" for 3 months -> "T1ts down, a55 up" ten minutes after he gets publicly spanked by Trump in the WH "Tariffs!!! HELL YEAH!!! WE BE KICKIN BUTT!!" -> "Zero tariffs." after a mean tweet from Trump "CHINESE EV'S!!! FIGHT DA POWAHHH!!!!!! -> "Zero Chinese EV's" after a mean tweet from Trump (Trump now rules our country from his Twitter acct) "We support the war" -> "The war is illegal" -> "We might join it" - within 48 hrs Just wait, soon "Canada might send troops to defend Greenland" will become "GET OFF TRUMP'S ISLAND OR WE WILL KILL YOU ALL!!!!" lol. It's like Dr Jeckyll and Mr Hyde, for real though. The change couldn't be any more dramatic. I hate to say it, but if Carney was a woman, I would honestly be blaming his period. I've never in my life seen a man change positions so dramatically and so frequently. My apologies to women everywhere.

Podcasts >>> MSM News. It's one person with their reputation on the line 100%, vs a corporation with a massive legal team and a laundry list of ridiculous broadcast rights and protections. Joe Rogan is personally accountable for every word he says, 24/7, forever, while CNN is a revolving door of liars and snakes who can all take the fall personally while CNN is protected.

Unless someone admits to it, we're never gonna know the truth, and anyone who pretends to know is lying. A picture of an Iranian missile hitting the school means nothing to me:

Wow. That was some serious dodging and weaselling. And none of it coherent. Basic freedom: "Girls having public bathrooms to use with no men present" - gone. Stripped away by leftists. Just go into the bathroom in front of that man who's dressed like a woman and hope for the best, little Sally.

In the the 1900s the CBC was indispensable. Now people all over the country have other, more reliable options for their news and entertainment. And the CBC isn't merely "biased" anymore. You could be biased without lying, and the CBC is caught lying all the time. Omission, minimization, and exaggeration are all forms of lying that the CBC uses on a daily basis. It's a "news" channel that will post stories from "anonymous sources" about Trump and present them as facts, and then skip the key details about the testimony of a man who shows his face in Parliament with emails as evidence. It's over. This was the last straw for CBC. I don't care if the CBC keeps going, but they should never be allowed to have the word "News" on any of their shows again.

No, it doesn't. MH is a cornered rat and he's lashing out. Over in the US page there's a thread about Mamdani's wife, the woman who loves seeing terrorist attacks where women and children are tortured and murdered, and over here the CBC just basically got torched to the ground. This is the worst day of his repugnant little alt-leftist life. Just ignore his insults. He's finished here.

You see an article about an actual human from the CBC, who shows his face to the world, and tells us all that he has conclusive proof that CBC is 100% biased, and your response to this thread is... to make a snotty comment that basically accuses the thread starter of being a racist, and then you ignore the ENTIRE story... That post is absolute proof of who you are and what you actually stand for MH. You've never been more transparent about your disdain for integrity and democracy. Your credibility just sunk below robo's with one post. Congratulations.

This is an actual photo from the "Rosemary Barton Room" on the day that Trudeau resigned:

Leftists will avoid this thread like the plague, just like the one about the Mamdani family's love of terrorism. So will fake conservatives like MH.

What does that say about a person when the ayatollah's propaganda reels them in like a small fish on 100 lb test line?

Perfect example though, of how muslims will pretend to be decent people to get what they want, while being extremely evil where it counts.

The Mamdani family wants "more children to be tortured and killed in Hamas terrorist attacks", not "pro-genocide regimes toppled". Thank you Dems, for showing us who you really are.

🤣 Nice try, Einstoned. He's a hypocrite because he's not railing against the racist system that's forcing people to show ID to shovel snow, but the fact that they can't vote without ID is somehow a crime to him. Mamdani and the Dems: "Only poor white people can get ID, Black people are too dumb to get it, so poor blacks can't vote. But somehow they can get ID to shovel snow if they want to. Or maybe they're too lazy to shovel snow anyways, so it doesn't matter?" What's the deal, Hodad? Why is there a crusade to allow people to vote with no ID but not to allow people to work with no ID? Make it make sense... Isn't the right to work arguably far more important than being allowed to vote? If you can't work tomorrow, you can't eat next week. If you can't vote tomorrow, it doesn't matter yet, because you don't need to be able to vote until November.

Yup. A billion dollars here and there tends to do that 🤣 And again: are we supposed to believe that an MSM outlet that lets one party control the narratives and bans the other from talking, is gonna just throw out unbiased polling data? Why would they do all that lying and manipulating just to harpoon their own false narratives with damaging facts? As a broadcaster they're not allowed to say "we prefer this guy's message" or "we don't think that the PM's unethical actions constituted a major scandal", but they are allowed to omit key details of a story and then say "polling data shows that support for the LPoC was unaffected by this weekend's events." How hard is it to find someone who's willing to skew polling data? In the US and Canada it's impossible to find legitimate polling data.

Here's what CBC is talking about today: That's from CBC's main page. No mention of the whistleblower. Hmmm. What about the "Canada" page: Not in the ^top^ section... Not in the ^middle^ section either. It's on the bottom right corner of the "Canada" page, literally the very last spot your eyes will get to on the page. So they omitted the key details of the story and put the story in the last-lace spot on their entire website. If this was a story about Trump from an anonymous source it would be on CBC's front page, for sure. "Anonymous source says that Trump said "shithole countries" at a WH meeting" was a front-page story for CBC, but when their own reporter shows his face and testifies about what's basically the end of our democracy it's on the backburner, with the main details omitted. Snowfall warnings in Northern Ontario made the top section of the page today, but CBC banning conservatives from TV is an also-ran.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/travis-dhanraj-cbc-host-9.7121917 This is the CBC's own report on the whistleblower complaints made by their former employee, Travis Dhanraj. A quote from the Communist Broadcasting Corporation article above: He said he felt shows like Power & Politics would just have Liberal talking points on all the time, and that as a network, the CBC needed balance. "There were repeated episodes of Conservatives being blocked. I mean, I have the G-chats right here. I said in terms of getting folks on, that we need to have balance," Dhanraj said. He said at one point he "heard that maybe he could have NDP folks" on his show. "But Conservatives are a no? I mean, it should blow the Canadian public's mind that this was the stuff that was going on," he said. The lying weasels at CBC also omitted the key allegations, I just grabbed these from an AI search, and I will see if CBC mentions them in a diffferent article somewhere: Former CBC anchor Saro Dhanraj testified that he was forbidden from booking Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and other Conservatives on his show, citing a "democratic deficit" within the broadcaster. He alleged that, as a journalist trying to be balanced, he was prevented from speaking with Conservatives, prompting calls for a management overhaul. Key details: Allegation: Dhanraj stated he was not allowed to pick up the phone to talk to Conservatives, including Poilievre. This should be the final nail in the coffin for the CBC, if not the LPoC as well. The fact that a leader of the opposition was banned from the state broadcaster's airwaves in primetime is directly from the Authoritarian Rule for Dummies handbook.

Leftists are't touching this thread. It seems that the fact that Mamdani's wife is a Hamas supporter is even too much for robo and the rest of the cultists to bear.

I just showed you the quote about "countries being destroyed", stupid. From a NASA "expert" right at the genesis of this latest climate scam. Point proven. Just shut up, add it to your laundry list of daily beatdowns, and move one.

No, I called you out for not making an adult reply. You just accused conservatives of "trying to take away people's rights" and I pointed out that you're the ones taking away people's BASIC rights. Again, "SHOULD WOMEN AND GIRLS HAVE THE RIGHT TO A PUBLIC BATHROOM WITH NO MEN IN IT?" Just answer these two simple questions, and then we can set the tranny discussion aside: Are you not taking away a basic right of women and girls? What "right" are conservatives trying to take away from Trans?

You're the one who directed the conversation entirely in that direction. Everyone else was on topic, aside from you. Then you had a hissy fit.

Theoretically AOC is that person too, but Dem cultists are so ret4rded that she still looks smart to them.

@Reg Volk This reminds of the movie Zoolander, where Ben Stiller's friends died in "a harmless gasoline fight". These were just good kids who got unlucky while trying to throw some bombs into a crowd together, and now people are calling them names I guess. *sigh* Luckily CNN was there to get their story right. /💩