angrypenguin

Likely become a productive citizen? Please.

And some on here want to say that Justin's following through on his promises already. You can't have it both ways.

Maybe it's because i'm anal retentive because this isn't my primary board that I post in. Your post indicated homes, as in plural.

Your new government still has to actually act on this. And I hope to hell they tax it because of their many holes in their costing plan. If they raise enough revenues, hopefully they don't increase taxes.

Cite please. Where has the LPC said they will not take in other refugees at all?

They will rent homes? HOMES?

My point was that both are criminal offenses. Poor sheep though.

There's a lot to be said about the importance of physical meetings. Surely G8/G20 meetings rank "up there" when it comes to having an in person meeting. A lot of communication happens at the non verbal level.

That's the point. They never costed the true "cost", it's what makes it poor costing. They'll just absorb their #'s into other #'s, like those who need social assistance, or homeless #'s or etc etc. You asked me for a cite, I provided it. Argus was saying the same thing, the true cost of allowing 25,000 Syrians to come in has not been costed.

Finally.

Dude, really? 1) Both were criminal offenses at the time the offense occurred. Maybe one day it'll be fine for me to rape a sheep, but until then, it's illegal.

Sure. https://www.liberal.ca/files/2015/09/The-Liberal-fiscal-plan-and-costing.pdf Page 16. We'll never know how they got to 100 million in year 1, 50 million in year 2, so sure, ok maybe I might give them the benefit of the doubt, but no detail breakdown of numbers. But year 3 and year 4: 0 cost? That's a load of bull. These people will not be contributing to society, and will be a net drag on social resources. But yet we see a 50% reduction in year 1 and year 2. Give me a break. Let alone 0 cost for year 3 and 4? Even the most die hard Liberal supporters must see that this is a joke.

No, but they are both criminal offenses.

And your boy did pot while sitting in parliament. As long as the public "forgives" him, two of the same situations to me.

Disband this damn organization.

I believe the latter.

The cost was also very poorly costed.

And it's up to you to decide? At what point does someone need a tax break then? $95k and having to raise children? That's not a lot of money post tax.

Again, rhetoric. I know of some people who make $60k a year, and the spouse makes $35k, tell me, that only benefits the wealthy? Please. See Wilber's post above.

Do the people here who are against this endure a life of chronic pain? I'm as blue tory as they come but...living the life of chronic pain that I do... I'm for assisted suicide. I don't even need a physician, just tell me what button to push...say...instructions from a nurse.

Yep. Entitled brats.

The guy was exonerated. The amount of hyperbole in your post is nauseating. If anything, Harper should regret throwing him out.

The idea that the majority of the people should have their way is scary. The majority of the people believe that the wealthy should pay 89% in taxes. (as a joke, and serious at the same time). If the majority of the people have it their way, that will happen. Then in time, those wealthy people will leave, and then unemployment will go up. So.....................................how is that good long term again?

Why?

It was fine for the harpers.