poochy

In light of his stance on womens issues he just couldn't have refused the invite or gone elsewhere, nope, according to his die hards around here he seemingly had no choice but to condone the segregation of women by attending, he just couldn't avoid the exposure of his own politically expedient hypocrisy. Some of you are seriously broken.

Do you ever have a point to make?

Ah, the two wrongs fallacy. PM claims feminist high ground, condones segregation of women by men and religion, supporters defend by citing other instances where men segregate women.......umm, we know this happens, the point is, (i know, this is REALLY hard to get) we dont want our PM condoning it, or anyone else, but not noticing the ridiculous hypocrisy of someone who at least partially got himself elected for being a feminist and insinuating the last guys were anti women is kind of a big deal.

There is a vast difference between being trolled and being told you are wrong about something when you absolutely are wrong about it

Full Pretzel.

Well, he sounded like a control freak who thought he was running his own fiefdom, good riddance.

O, well then... How many more ways do you think you can split that hair? Yes, our ultra feminist PM decided it was ok because the mosque is only segregated during prayer...right. It isn't about the mosque, it's about him and his followers, you have no real principles, you stand for nothing and your willing to go that far to defend it. I'm embarrassed for you.

We shouldn't have any problem with the concept of anyone being an asshole, the problem arises when certain white liberal guilt types pretend the certain other groups can't be assholes or racists themselves.

Yea, we know, the liberals are 'good for you', so you don't much care about how they behave. You have zero credibility.

So I thought we could have a thread where liberal supporters twist themselves into knots reconciling the, it's 2016 mantra, while the author of such attends a house of worship where women are segregated, while at the same time explaining how treating women as lesser beings is in fact a Canadian value in 2016. They are Canadians, and your choice of leader just endorsed it, unless of course he criticized them for that policy while he was there. But then he was just showing respect for their beliefs that just happen to show an inherent disrespect for more than half of the population. Stake the moral high ground as the feminist PM, require gender equal cabinet, supporters, such as they are, laud him for it, then attends segregated mosque. Imagine if Harper had bought a wedding cake from a place that refused to serve homosexuals..., segregate and treat half of the population as lesser humans, and it's no big deal. Begin Or don't, it's not possible to square that circle while being honest.

Well then, it should be easy for him to stand up for the NEB process on energy east, call out radicals for interrupting it, has he said a single word about that yet? Where's your leader?

So nothing to say on the subject of the op, color me all surprised.

I honestly don't think you can blame Trudeau for this. I feel that in the west our lives have become so easy that we are simply producing more and more infantile and impractical people, as a result it's becoming nearly impossible to run the country without pandering to them. This government, the way it got elected, the shallowness of its message and it's leader is just a reflection of the country, and it's only going to get worse. This is what people want right now, unserious fakery, for at least the next 7 years. But, maybe when our leadership has convinced the China's and India's of the world to deny their people the lives they want and everyone else has cut back on what they already have we can look back with that sickly Canadian smugness and congratulate ourselves for how good we are, how nice we are, for our leadership. I know I'm looking forward to it.

So far I have learned that the government that appoints the members of the OEB that approves rate changes has nothing to do with the rate changes, unless of course, Mike Harris. Tell me more.

No, i think you missed that lesson. Nothing is supposed to be free, you're supposed to be allowed to work for it, sometimes that doesn't work out, but looking at the country as a whole, it does. Of course a high minded idealist like yourself won't see it that way, things could be better, perfect even, if only everyone got one board, it's been tried before.

There are some people here who seem to have misspent their youth listening to John Lennon, everybody can have everything! It's easy, if only we tried! Reality be damned.

We all lose when stupid people win, and that's all this is, intelligent vs stupid, and there have always been more stupid people.

OMG the parrallels are so obvious, im overcome by the realizations of the errors of my ways! WOE This post should be locked, its a troll, others have been locked for much less.

Please stop playing dumb when you've lost an argument.

I don't much care about sitting during the anthem, I also think its stupid to play it before every game, in every sport. But he also worse socks with pigs in police uniforms on them, of course some of you will 'think' that's funny, but if you were a cop I think you would take that as an insult and it doesn't really do anything except further normalize disrespect for the police and probably get more people hurt. So If you don't have to do that work, let the NFL hire private security. Kaepernick isn't that good anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if they release him.

This is one of those cases where it sounds to me like she needs a lot of help, probably in an institution, it sounds like she was a victim as well.