poochy

So you somehow think that people who aren't Canadian should somehow be allowed to fight to become Canadian under the laws of the country they are currently from that has absolutely nothing to do with and no influence at all over our own laws? So in a way another country would be telling us what people we have to take...which would be no more valid or somehow different than if they tried to do that now, in which case we would laugh at them and refuse. Nah, don't think so.

So what? Judging by some of the conspiracy theory posts you start your opinions should be about the last ones that are considered.

Yes, i have done those as well, it's all about maintaining a consistent answer while the same question is being asked a dozen different ways, i don't disagree with the idea of testing, im just not sure how feasible it is. I disagree with the idea that we are somehow bad people (racists of course) for wanting the country to stay as good as it is.

There are differences within a certain range of values, however, stepping off of a plane and calling yourself Canadian does not make you so, and there are certainly values held by some that are not typically Canadian. Your statement stems from the predominantly left wing belief that it's somehow wrong to have any sort of pride in the nation, or somehow believe it's possible for some nations or cultures to have beliefs that appear to be better than others. We can, and we do, and yes, we are better in part because of our inclusiveness, but if you allow yourself to be changed too much by those who disagree, or risk violence against you for your inclusiveness, what actual value have you brought to the nation? It's that question that is often asked and never answered, why for example are progressives so quick to support cultures that treat homosexuals, and women and quite often their children so badly, but somehow Israel is the focus of attention? Why? Is it because Israel is a better country and should know better or show more restraint? No, that can't be, because all cultures are equal, they can't be better. But can they be more evil, o yes, certainly, broken ideology, and they are in too deep to ever see the light. I still dont think its realistic to test people, those who are most likely to want to come here for the wrong reasons are most likely able to lie to get here, but if it was possible, it wouldn't be wrong, it just makes good sense.

You cant dig your way out of a hole, but they do keep trying.

No, you're attempting to discredit an entire discussion by turning it into something it isn't, it's a typical tactic when you can actually argue the details. I doubt anything like this screening would be effective, but for example, lets say you could ask a man if he thought stoning a woman for adultery was the right thing do do, and he agreed, what exactly would the country lose by not allowing him to live here? Tell us, im dying to know, or just build another straw man and argue against it, whatever works for you.

Hey remember those 10 years when the conservatives muzzled our scientists and we didn't hear a thing about global warming? literally, nothing. So, where are they, how come they aren't out there telling us about the things? Those mean old liberals won't let them? Nah, it's the specter of conservative days gone past that is somehow still stopping them! What a joke, it's incredible how easily some of you delude yourselves.

A fine example on multicultural Canadian brainwashing, thanks libs. It's not a choice, you have been told why, but you just can't accept the truth of it.

Harper Harper Harper, utter garbage. Hey, the libs have had most of a year to completely change any policy the wished, so which is it, Harper was evil and so are the liberals, or neither? Delusional nonsense as usual. There are no leftovers that they didn't choose to keep, it honestly makes me sick to see the sort of lies your type is willing to tell.

OK, so where is all of the science we so desperately missed, it's either or, they are still muzzled, or they aren't. If they aren't we should have all sorts of revelations now that they weren't allowed to speak about before, but we don't because the idea that we were missing anything is an enormous lie, but we know how liberals love to be lied to. Hey, remember how Harper destroyed our environment? It seems to have recovered surprisingly quickly. But i did enjoy the part where you claimed this was somehow about slow process of change to new government, the only thing better than being lied to is lying to yourself, there is nothing new, no science that we didn't already know, the whole thing was part of the evil conservatives narrative that liberal liars told the country for a decade, be better.

Really? So this is currently happening as normal practice?

You wont get anything other than trolling answers, it was bs right from the start. Public service employees that are liberals who used it to smear the government, no different than the liberal veterans who attacked the cons for the pension reform that they didn't write and that the current liberals, even after using it against the conservatives, still have the veterans in court over. Or the audits of environmental charities that the liberals didn't stop after being elected. It was all lies, but these people don't care about those facts.

You never fail to impress.

He is trolling, he rarely seriously debates anything.

Umm, that ignores the fact that idiots on the fringe left tried, and still do, to make Harper look like a coward with this nonsense. It wasn't right or funny then, and it isn't now, no doubt being employed by the country's largest purveyor of liberal media has no influence on the things it's employees think are acceptable. But of course, there could never be anything to that right?

nope, no sense to be found anywhere

First you would have to prove that the comments were purposefully left on the page, and endorsed by it's owners, seems no one can, and they were removed, so where's the story? Was it a cpc official that made the comments? Do they directly represent the party somehow? Or was this another in a huge line of internet idiots making a stupid comment? O it's its quite close to a 100% chance that it's the later. So now you have an idiotic comment that was rightfully removed from a cpc website made by someone in no official capacity. Of course to liberals the comment should somehow have been removed as it was being typed, maybe even before then, because there is absolutely no real world reason why it could simply have been missed or took some time to get it removed once it was made known. You see, here in the real world, everything always happens instantly. Personally i think death threats should be prosecuted, no matter where they appear, or who makes them, there would be a lot more loony lefties with a record right now if that was the case. While protecting Harper, that might have also had a trickle down effect to all of the idiots here and elsewhere who spent the previous decade calling our last PM Hitler. So, this is a nothing story really, an idiot said something, it was fixed, if only all social media commentary sites could be so lucky. Is hoping for someones death the same as threatening them? Nah, a close second maybe https://twitter.com/smccreary/status/769991342168674307 This one maybe? https://twitter.com/stephen_taylor/status/769992218354585601 How about this? https://twitter.com/smccreary/status/769994531416731648 There are more examples of course, anyway, with that, if you had you sense of self preservation you would stop posting about this nonsense, all sides do it, and as the examples show, it isn't always caught, and in Harper's case it was rampant, how many of you tried to stop it?

Should we hope he out does him while dealing with an actual recession? Or is that counter productive?

What a powerfully stupid thing to say, i feel badly for how ignorant you are, the system fails often, as it seems to have in your case. Now tell us, where did anyone say we should nurture violent tendencies? Or don't and save us from the lies. I wonder how many of you think like this and then will wail when anyone suggests that some other extreme male dominated cultural practices are things we don't want in this country, it's incredible how logically inconsistent and down right stupid that is and how unable you are to see it.

So you think a homophobic insinuation is a strong argument? Go ahead, deny it, anyway, its the same old story, you aren't smart enough to make a good argument, or there isn't one to be made, so you insult, doesn't matter how many of the other dogs come here and howl on your behalf, it's a homophobic insult and the moderators are letting you get away with it.

Best you could do eh?