Jump to content

Thinkinoutsidethebox

Member
  • Posts

    407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Thinkinoutsidethebox

  1. I await with bated breath You "believe" but have no evidence... True but in every case they had undeniable evidence (hopefully) to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. I believe you've even stated they hauled all the evidence off before there could be any proper investigation. Why not? They were just a capable as you and I. Again, not relevant to the aircraft and you have no argument from me here. Got a link? Hey, that's entirely possible, why didn't the tower collapse then? Why not, what does an Arab hijacker look like when remove the turban? Just like most other travelers in an airport... You know as well as I security gets complacent, they are only human. How many thousands of people were in these airports that morning? I'd like to meet one, got a number? Adress? Handle on here? It's impossible to demolish a tower that was struck by an aircraft? The wing is still attached to the plane? It was like that when it got there? It's just beginning to enter the building what's your point? The description makes it sound like it should be like a bug hitting a windshield.
  2. You have good evidence and arguments for the demolition of the towers but your aircraft argument falls flat on it's face. So far I've seen no valid arguments against the chain of events that resulted in the aircraft as claimed striking the twin towers. As far as whodunit? I wouldn't be surprised people in the US are actually responsible, a few people had allot to gain.
  3. This site needs a "how to" section... Actually members input works good
  4. Works here... Now it works again... Maybe a little practice will get it Multi quote works THANKS!!!
  5. What exactly does USGOCT stand for anyway? I'm assuming it's the 9/11 report?
  6. 1. So planes did strike the twin towers? What total impossibilities? 2. So you don't know... That kinda blows your argument out of the water. 3. EXCELLENT idea, only problem is he probably doesn't have a clue. I think he was a true political puppet. 4. That is entirely possible, that also has nothing to do with the aircraft. 5. Well, from what I've seen, heard, read and experienced those aircraft striking striking the towers as they did driven by who they claimed is entirely possible, there is no question in my mind. As far as the errant engine is concerned, maybe it was planted to really get the conspiracy theorists going, I have no idea. 6. The aircraft were flown into the towers, there is no need to investigate the cause of the crash. Besides most of the evidence would have been obliterated in the collapse of the towers anyway.
  7. Now YOU'RE saying it's all about the money... What IS truth, what IS honest? Oooor what is YOUR truth, what is YOUR honest?
  8. LOL, I don't have a clue... I posted a question in a new topic and drifted here out of curiosity and saw this quote box and "PRESTO" here it is!
  9. How do you split a quote into pieces so you can reply separately to different points a person is making? I also can't figure out how multi quotes work Thanks.
  10. HE Sorry, I still don't get your money statement You also need to realize, reporters are like computers, they are there to report what's happening, you feed them garbage, they are going to report garbage. Yes there is a certain amount of research and such they should do but where do you draw the line?
  11. Sooty black smoke is actually not a good determining factor for actual fire temperature. I say this because I have personally seen the results of black sooty fires on automobiles and equipment, the heat can get high enough to cause steel to bend and settle. That being said, this stuff didn't just "freefall" and disintegrate...
  12. So HE, what struck the twin towers? What happened to the planes and passengers? Do you have an alternative chain of events as to what caused the explosions and fires before the towers collapsed? As far as the incorrect jet engine being found near the site I have no clue, how do you know. that wasn't made up? Did it fall off a truck that happened to be in the area? Who read the serial numbers off it? Was it an engine that was being tested on this aircraft? I can see no investigation being done to determine the cause of the crash as what happened is blatantly obvious. Especially the second plane.
  13. Money? What makes these reporters more honorable then others? They align with your line of thinking?
  14. Rue, that might be "moths to light" or "flies to a pile of sh1t" but you're 100% correct, this is like every other scam to make easy money. Heck, it's cheaper then buying a lottery ticket and the odds of winning are way higher. Canada is becoming the new US as far as law suits are concerned... Except the government is just giving it away. I'm pretty sure my rights have been violated one way or another... Gotta be worth at least 50 mil.
  15. Windsor tower is not even close to a valid argument, it was still standing after it's major 18 to 20hr fire, you see that in the picture. The portions of the floors that did actually collapse did so over several hours. The WTC buildings were collapsed into piles ten feet high after about four hours... That doesn't raise any flags? Here's an analysis http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/project/research/structures/strucfire/CaseStudy/HistoricFires/BuildingFires/default.htm Although I'm not sure what HE is getting at with the aircraft he does have some very valid arguments and evidence about the collapse of the buildings.
  16. Oh oh, time to watch my back? The natives will be coming over the hill any moment now? You wouldn't be visiting from an alternate universe by any chance?
  17. She's the one that brought her kids into this... She called him on it and that was his knee jerk reaction, if she's been using climate change as a photo opp then he should have said so. There may be totally legitimate reasons to call her Climate Barbie. Reporters enter the industry with the best of intentions, problem is they have to answer to editors and editors have to answer to the the board and the board have to answer to advertisers and/or subscribers. This is a problem with capitalist media and it's getting worse as they are getting squeezed by alternate news sources. I bet Rebel subscriptions fluctuate daily based on actions and decisions made by staff and management, numbers = revenue.
  18. "Climate Barbie" is pretty catchy, instead of fighting it she should own it. That would teach her kids how to handle situations like this. It would also really piss off the righties
  19. Why don't soldiers launch a class action lawsuit against the government? They have a far more valid argument and have returned with injuries and PTSD we refuse to address. The government (we the people) actually sent them over there, we bring them back and then kick them to the curb. But we don't have the will to fight frivolous lawsuits brought on by Khadr nand company? This is what Canada is becoming?
  20. Actually, that has nothing to do with crude oil transportation, those trucks deliver from fuel distribution points to gas stations and such. That's not going to change.
  21. Where does one get good, unbiased, reliable news? You keep hammering on CBC but corporate media has to be biased toward their sponsors and advertisers. People should lighten up on the media, there are many good journalists out there. Calling news organizations left or right shows our own biases and refusal to even consider the other side's point of view.
  22. Maybe Trudeau's thinking is we treat them good enough they will have no desire to attack here? Finally Canada's taking the lead! Can't beat em join em?
  23. The way our politicians are operating (anybody else hear crickets in the opposition camps?) I'd be willing to pay them to level Parliament while in session. It's getting to the point we need to seriously consider starting over...
  24. Taxme, I used to think allot like you do now then I started wondering why these people are the way they are. I opened up my mind and my ears and really started listening and a whole new world was opened up to me. Today I understand a lot more why these people are the way they are. You think there is no racism? Paint your skin red, go out and look for work, get a loan, even stand in line or walk down the street or in a mall and get back to us. The past is the only evidence we have, it's all we got to determine how we act today and in the future. Money is only part of the overall solution, it's going to take effort on everyone's part to fix this. Obviously I won't convince you in these few posts but you never know, I may have planted a seed. Next time you see, interact with or hear something about these people you may actually pay attention
×
×
  • Create New...