monty16

No, I'm not trolling the mods. And once again, this is not about me and has nothing to do with me maybe being somebody else. That is again a personal attack against me and I'm really beginning to wonder how many that is from you. As for the abrasive tone charge of yours, just replace the party I'm making the charge against with Iran or Iraq and everything will be fine again.

So Pelletiere, a CIA section leader, was a holocaust denier? So Pelletiere wildly exaggerated? So Pelletiere thinks Hitler was a really nice guy? Is that what you're trying to say?

http://rt.com/news/169144-iraq-russian-jets-arrive/ Lies I say, nothing but RT lies. Maliki, the US installed puppet, would never get so desperate to keep his head on his shoulders. Literally speaking. And more lies! LOL

Think it through Wilber, As long as the Conservatives under Harper are in control we'll keep on bending to the wishes of the US in order to pacify them on their phony war against terrurism. Isn't it obvious enough already who the bad guys are when they hold prisoners for years without trial. Not to mention torturing them and killing them for sport? Harper's handlers of course. He sits in their laps while they groom him.

Maybe you weren't paying attention. I obviously referred to the bloodless referendum in the Crimea. That's all settled and the blood being spilled now is a reference to the Eastern and Southern Ukraine by the Ukrainian military. And what in hell did you think I was referring to? LOL If you would follow RT news you would be getting reports of what is happening in the Ukraine. Not to say that RT isn't biased but to say that it's not being disputed by any of the Amerinazis news sites. And I'm going to stich 'my' neck out further and say that Canada wouldn't have bombed Quebec to stop them from separating. We would have stood on guard for theeeeee! m In any case, the Russians didn't and Canada didn't and the US did on many occasions, costly 500,000 Iraqi live according to latest estimates. That's lowballed because both wars cost over a million lives of Iraqis.

Is it true? The former CIA official (Pelletiere) revealed that immediately after the battle the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report that said it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds.

Oh really! Now you're trying to tell me that I'm going to go missing in the night? And you're trying to tell me to boot that Canada wouldn't have respected Quebec's decision on the referendum? But the really insne idea is that the Crimean people's decision wasn't bloodless! The only thing you're right about is that Putin is tough and he's ex-KGB and so that's why the US tries so hard to demonize him. I'm not sure whether they or you have done the best job at that? LOL And as we speak the blood spilled is of the Ukrainian people who oppose the US/Nato installed dictator. They helped uninstall the duly elected one!

Well, I do question it because according to Pelletiere, Saddam didn't have the right gas. But if he did have the right gas then it had to have been supplied to Saddam by the US. Rather inconvenient complications don't you think? I'm sure you understand all this but don't go and explain it to the rest of the forum please. It would do them a lot of good to find out something for themselves before they go shooting off their cakeholes on the issue.

Dong what is right is ceding to the will of the people. In Canada we even gave the people of Quebec the right to decide by referendum whether or not they would remain a part of Canada. Would you have denied them that right and bombed them into submission to either Ukrainian or Canadian dictated control? Can you not at least celebrate with me the fact that it was bloodless in both cases? Would you rather support US methods of slaughtering hundreds of thousands and then losing to the wishes of the people anyway?? Vietnam, Iraq, Iran, Serbia, and so on.

I'm bringing the crimes of the US to your attention because I want to continue to live in Canada, not in Antarctica where it's safe from radiation poisoning. If you dislike what I say so much then why not criticize it and stop referring to me in your arguments. You know you aren't going to get away with that so you'll have to keep hinting at how It's so frustrating. I'm really of the opinion that the US is going to get nuked by freedom fighters if it doesn't start being nice. The problem is, they probably won't try to nuke some hillbillies in Mississippi or Arkansas, they'll try to do N.Y. or Seattle or some other big city close to our border.

Is my suggestion that we would have had another world war without the fact that the Soviets had nukes, in some way suggesting that I wasn't aware of the fact that the Soviet Union didn't exist pre-WW1? Huhhhhhh? Not exactly the truth but it's not worth my time to point out the distinction.

No you didn't. You read what you mistakenly thought was delight over Russia bombing Sunnis. It was delight over Russia being asked by Maliki to protect the Iraqi people. Bombing people is not right if the Russians did it and it's not right when the US constantly keeps doing it. And of course, it's my delight over the fact that the US's puppet Maliki, who has gone bad, is asking Russia to come to Iraq when that was the US's main mission to prevent. Now there's a danger of Iraq being sympathetic to Russia and not the US! Such a waste of US military lives! And much more important, such a waste of money! Oh, and try to remember that this isn't about me.

Apartheid in South Africa and Israel should be stamped out, or, driven into the sea if you prefer. Racism in the US and Moscow isn't tolerable either. And as far as no blacks or Asians living in Moscow, that's silly US propaganda.

Your claims are your own fantasies but in any case, I'll again remind you that you can't dismiss US crimes by trying to include the crimes of other countries. If you want to excuse US crimes then you should deal with that. If you want to make a submission on what Russia did to Chechnya then do that and I'll deal with that too.

I would expect that the destruction of evil apartheid regimes should be in the charter of all powerful countries that can serve the UN in eliminating it. Keeping in mind the UN's charter mandate which most on this forum will not be aware of. That's why it's totally legitimate to hear that we should push 'apartheid into the sea'. It's not regime specific.

You can pretty well bet that we would have had another world war if the Soviet Union didn't have the deterrent to war. Powerful nations such as the US will, don't ever doubt it. This is why it's so important that Iran finally procures it's own deterrent to US aggression. And it will serve on behalf of the rest of the Muslim world which will no longer be trampled upon.

Anybody whose imagination leads them to believe that Yanukovich didn't need to run for his life should consider the response this kind of protest would get in the US if it was the Whitehouse that was being stormed. The obvious cure for the problem would be to shoot them all dead in the US, the land of the gun. In stark comparison, Tiannamen square where a tank stopped short of rolling over a lone individual protester! We can hold Kent State up to be a sharp contrast!

Calling me a dupe is a personal attack and I've reported it. In Europe, and indeed the rest of the world there is a totally different mindset at play. There's literally no possibility that they will eve choose a corrupted system that is anything like the US system. But in Canada there appears to be a sick mindset of being accepting to a system where the wealthy get better care than the poor. Is that what you're advocating? Because a two-tier system can't mean anything else as far as I know. Would you like to explain what it means to you? And would you like to give us all some examples of some European two-tier system. Not just saying that it is, telling us what it consists of? then we'll have an idea of what you are hoping to turn Canada's system into.

There's no harm in reminiscing and wondering what could have been or what should have been. Just as long as it doesn't serve to distract from the pressing issues of the day. There's no need to point out what country is the biggest threat to world peace right now!

Wasn't that the Soviet Union? Should we show each other pictures of airplanes and other US weapons of mass destruction in order to make a point? How about going back to Vietnam? Or how about just not trying to take the heat off the US with references back to the Soviet war in Afghanistan which was undeniably as egregious when it comes to wars of aggression? Take the high road American, not always a comparison of your country's evil with more evil. It's not a denial of any sort.

If Harper was to win another majority then I fear that Canadians would lose the opportunity to stop the march toward US style government. The US took the wrong turn in the road with the stealing of the election by Bush2 and now even a Democrat party victory would be the start of little meaningful change. Their politics has moved so far to the right that even the insanity of the teabaggers could be seen as normal now. Canadians must be vigilant in order to stop Harper's destruction of everything we have left as being Canadian. Chiefly, our health care system is in danger. They hardly even bother to deny that their aim is a two-tier system that would be the foot in the door to their agenda of discrimination against people with less resources. Allow them to make it higher quality for the wealthy and lower quality for the poor and we will have lost much of what we hold so dear. And that's only one of their ambitions!

http://rt.com/news/169072-eu-criticism-israel-settlements/ We should have all been aware for a long time that the US would never apply any pressure on the Zionists to reform and stop the apartheid policies against the Palestinian people. But this is encouraging because Europe seems to be ready to speak up and get something done. They undoubtedly are coming to the understanding that their wellbeing is going to be endangerd more seriously if they don't start to demand some sort of fairness by Israel. disclaimer: I don't blame Israel or the Jewish people and so I refer to the problem as Zionism. If some members disagree then please do so in a polite and reasonable manner. And I'm going to use this thread as a test thread, in the interest of finding out if the forum's admin and mods have any interest in stopping the spamming and other bad behaviour. Please don't. Thanks!

I saw you advocating a free for all between the parties involved. The American solution is nearly always advocating violence and slaughter as long as it's not on US soil. But you know that what goes around, comes around sometimes in September. So why not try to make a more nuanced contribution to this forum than always hoping for a violent solution? The house they fly airplanes into next September could be yours! Or it could be something a lot bigger than an airplane and ground zero will be a mile wide so your house would be insignificant. In other words, be nice.

No, neither Obama or the US should get involved in any other country. It's never for a good or humanitarian cause and it always results in hundreds of thousands of victim under US bombs. Russia is going to the Iraqi people rescue on the request of Maliki. Russia has shown that it is capable in the Crimea of not causing many deaths in doing what is required. Russia will keep the peace and leave it to the people and they will sort it out peacefully without bombs from 30,000 feet.

What is it that you are ascribing to stupidity. Or that is it? Make up your mind. If you don't know yourself then how can you make others understand?