monty16

No, no, and no. You seem to want to walk into the same trap that your accomplice b_c repetitively stumbles into with me. You'll never get my denial of evil on the part of other nations in order to ease the guilt of the US. All you do is repeat the truths I have handed you to regurgitate for me. It's easy to read between the lines and see that you are trying to defend the crimes of the US by attempting to take us back 70 years and remind of us somewhat similar crimes against humanity. Even though it's completely arguable that at least some of their crimes paled in comparison to US crimes in some circumstances. It's going to take a lot of doing to top the My Lai massacre of women, children, and babes in arm! And I won't even get into talking about the lack of punishment meted out! LOL!

Simple, to the point, and right on the money. Sometimes the real truth can't be counterspun by US propgandists. the only annoying thing about it is that the propagandized and indoctrinated don't understand that they are being had. First, the trouble begins with the people and their perspective toward the evil their country is doing throughout the world. Might starts to lose it's power to make right, then the empire starts to crumble and a new world power rises up to take the empire's place. I suspect a colalition of good forces over evil and it's not going to be something that can be bombed away this time.

Fwiw, I'll never lower myself to the level of human filth that would wish for more American to die in revenge attacks by Iraqi people who have lost 'their' loved ones to US slaughter. No matter how insulting and ugly they get, they don't deserve it, they only deserve to have the truth brought home to them and to have to live with their guilt for the rest of their lives.

No, your American style bloodlust is not the order of the day. You only hope that your frustration over hearing the facts could be solved in that way. Russia can probably handle in a bloodless manner, somewhat similar to how the Crimea was handled. Best of luck though! Have I been too harsh with you? Have I charged you wrongly with hoping that more Iraqi people are slaughtered for your American cause. It's just that you seemed to have said it with a good amount of pride! I am also going to claim the high road on this one because it's really quite obvious that no decent person could actually wish for more slaughter of the innocent under US bombs. Right? Have I characterized you correctly this time?

Did your handlers tell you to say that? Or is it out of your head? Because RT didn't say otherwise? Over 30 a day? Hmmmm, that's worth making a note of! Let's give that a month or so.

No, the whole ugly mess the US created sickens me. I'm just delighted to hear that Russia is being given an invitation to come into Iraq and fix things up. We must face the facts, the Iraqi people have such a deepseated hate for the US now that there's a possibility of Iraq turning to the Russian sphere of influence. Not to mention Iran, Syria, and a few others. Ya gotta wonder why? And ya gotta wonder why some Canadians can't get their stuff together and figure out that they are taking the wrong side. I mean, it's just toooo obvious that the US just ain't the good guys anymore. It'll come to ya all, in probably less than a couple of years, it's only calling for a swallowing of some pride and a little rising above your indoctrination. LOL

Yup, the US slaughtered hundreds of thousands, maybe over a million Iraqis in the two wars on Iraq. And yes, before you blow your whole case again and admit the US guilt by including Canada, just remember that I'm not a Canada apologist and that tactic doesn't work with me. Something a little more imaginative this time perhaps? I apologize for not just ignoring you, you're too much fun to miss.

You don't even parrot the propaganda very well. Your only problem is going to be that Russia has the resources necessary for the Ukraine and that equals holding all the marbles. The US doesn't even have enough for themselves. So if the US decides it wants to play the cold war game again, it's not going to be nearly as easy with Russia. Quite exciting really to think of how this is going to end!

Mostly right! Except that you always need to drop in the disclaimer and parrot the anti-Russian politics of claiming the democratically elected president was crappy. Gee, so crappy that the people chose him? And would have decided to throw him out if they wanted to choose another one. So what's wrong with this picture other than US fomenting unrest in order to install the US sympathetic president. Man, once a US apologist is spun there's a lot of work to counterspin one. Not suggesting you dre, you got it at least half right

If Maliki invited Russia to come to Iraq and bomb Sunnis, would the US be pleased? Could such a thing ever happen? Would it cause Canadians to laugh and laugh until their bellies hurt from laughing? http://rt.com/news/168744-russia-jets-iraq-maliki/ Wait for it! Naw couldn't be so good, must be RT crap! Sweet dreams Americans and their lap dog Canadian apologists! What goes around is now coming around.

I can concede your point in the interest of fairness when you so willingly concede mine. Yes, there's little doubt that the US bombed Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people. And while it's a little doubtful that people voted for Saddam if they didn't want to vote for him, it's in the interest of humouring you to just say they did.

Yes, very much like the MSNBC comedy routine.

It's probably safe to assume that no Canadian is bankrupted by medical expenses. Well, at least it's safe until some whining American claims and proves otherwise. Until then they're all just blowing smoke and running around with their pants on fire.

Watch out what you say about clear ballot boxes because they were used in the Ukraine election too. Anyway, criticizing their use is just blowing smoke by people who don't understand free and fair elections so they listen to the US propagandists make it up as they go. Only they slip up and make criticisms of practices that their own side uses. And it was about 95% in favour of going with Russia anyway, so I'm embarrassed for those who are making up excuses for the US/Nato. Did the people of Iraq get a vote before the US bombed them from 30,000 feet and killed hundreds of thousands? Which crime is the biggest crime in the Orwellian world of US apologizing?

Shame on any US apologist that can still say with a straight face that the referendum in the Crimea wasn't near unamimously on the side of going with Russia. When US propaganda and lies fail them are we now to the point where some people can pretend that it's still the truth. Orwellian denial of the facts at it's alltime best! http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/crimea-referendum-results-show-more-than-95-of-voters-seek-to-join-russia-1.1731310 Beware of CTV, it's a Russian propaganda agency that contends that Canadians are devouring their young! Ppppphhhhhhttttttttttt!

I didn't read in RT news that the people of the referendum was done properly. I've read in any and all references to it that is was done properly and that it was a decision close to 90% in favour of leaving the Ukraine. What do you know about it? Let's debate the issue and stop blowing smoke up a dead dog's a-s. Both of us! Who's blowing smoke and who's talking the facts? And if you can't do that then I'm suggesting that you're doing nothing but babbling your feel good US propaganda nonsense. Put up or shut up pal, this is where the rubber meets the road. I'm saying that you know nothing about the issue and you've been pretending all along to have been in any ME country for any length of time. And then, if I ever get you to man up, we could go on to discuss the other issue that is supposed to be comparable, but not something we dare compare, in the minds of the US warmongers. That is, whether or not the crimes committed in Crimea can even come close to approaching the level of crimes committed against the people of Iraq.

I'm saying it and I've provided examples.

If b_c can't or won't provide a reference in the report then I'm finished with him. This is the kind of behaviour that is hurting this forum more than anything else. Everybody is in a hurry to insult and scream is not, is not, but nobody is willing to debate the issue.

Until you can show me something that I've posted here that pertains to the issue and is not true, I'll just consider you incapable of any sort of rational debate. A complete waste of my time and nothing but spamming of the thread. I should warn you that I'm going to be appealing to the moderators and admins to have that kind of behaviour stopped in the interest of a more elevated level of discussion on this forum. I have no idea on whether or not they will pay any attention to my appeal whatsoever. If you have an opinion on that then this would be a good time to voice it.

I look at the issue first and then decide based on that. Do you want to be on the opposite side of this one? Are you on the side of Fox news?

I would suggest that Russia's action on behalf of the people of the Crimea were for the good of humanity. After all, the people asked for a referendum and the referendum was resoundingly resolved in their favour. Could you say the same about the people of Iraq asking the US to bomb their country and slaughter hundreds of thousands of women and children. Wast that a popular war? Is the rapidity of ISIS's advance through Iraq now an indication of the people's resolve to reverse the evil the US has perped on the Iraqi people? Do you expect the people of the Crimea to do the same? LOL Have you even been in a ME country?

If you want to insinuate that I've reported something that is 'against the rules' then do so specifically. You are wroing again in thinking that I've only referenced RT news. Why would you try to lie about that? Are all websites that mention Wright considerd by you to be moonbat sites? What's your point? Is there something that I've quoted that isn't true? If you can't address the issue then I'm going to again make the charge that you are not interested in doing anything but attacking me and spamming the thread. For whatever personal reason you may have, who knows?

I'm not going to read it all. But b_c does deserve a chance to defend his case. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt rather than sign on to your suggestion that it's not worth our time. There could be some Canadians being bankrupted by health care costs. Why would you consider that to be impossible? My best guess is that he, b_c, is making reference to Canadians who think that they need to have immediate attention to their problems and are being forced to go the US for that attention. Hence, bankrupted by our system. If he can show some reference to that then we'll have something to debate.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/ksm-lawyer-sacrifices-military-career-to-stay-on-case/ And the nasty part of it is that he's only going to be allowed to represent his client for another six months anyway. Nazi tactics? Legitimate need for Wright to attend the social event?

Reported as a personal attack because the 'idiot' reference is clearly aimed at me. Please stay on topic and attack the message, not me.