monty16

LOL. Gotta be more lies from RT news. Right?

Hey, why didn't you tell me you reported this thread? LOL So let me make it clear to you again. Hate for US foreign policy in the ME where the US is slaughtering women and children for oil, is totally justified and warranted. What isn't justified is "your" hate for hearing it exposed. Why are you being such a hater? Do you have a weight problem?

If only we could make traitors pay for running off at the mouth, when they are in need of affordable health care. Send them to the US and tell them to ask the Fraser institute to pay the bill!

And! Well, you were good for your word for at least part of a day!

Heh, it's the price we don't pay for not signing on to Bush2's phony war against Iraq. It could be the price G.B. will pay for being a US lapdog. Blair undoubtedly thought that he was repaying a debt from 65 or 70 years ago. Never fear, Harper could get one last chance.

Your personal attacks have descended to the level of an uneducated teenager now. You're good company for your new friend, the frustrated housewife. But don't worry, I've appealed to Charles Anthony to put an end to what's going on. At worst he's watching you, at best it'll be you that gets the peepee slap for your bad behaviour. And don't worry, I'm more than willing to take the slap too if it helps to shut your girlfriend's cakehole as well as ours.

Anybody that sees the truth from RT news and isn't smart enough to either understand it or rebut it, had no credibility to begin with. Substance is above their heads and they can only parrot the US propaganda line. Russia bad, grunt, grunt, US good, grunt, grunt. Smaller brain than a slug.

This isn't about me. Why not try to read the information supplied by the link and then either agree with it or rebut it? Can't you even do that now? Why do you even think you deserve to be allowed to disrupt a topic that is at least trying to find answers to some of the questions? Are you a teenager or are you an adult? In my opinion you are a disgrace to Canada and the national anthem you pretend to hide behind. And more to the point: You go and shoot off your cakehole over my comments about Saudi supplying ISIS, then you can't even find something to say about it being correct information or not. I think you're just a 'troll' or in words everybody can understand, a totally useless, uneducated, mouthpiece for US propaganda.

Great stuff! And in comparison, if Kennedy hadn't been offed by one of his own country's cats, nobody would have even remembered about asking what they could do for their country.

You need to stop the demonizing of the people of Iraq and understand that you are doing it in blind cooperation with the US's agenda. The real facts are that Saddam had succeeded in having all sects and religions within the sects to live mostly peacefully alongside each other in a prospering Iraq. Even Christians were given the right to practice their religious beliefs in Saddam's Iraq. Women worked alongside of mean as their equals too! Unfortunately, most of what went on in Iraq after the end of the Iraq/Iran war and before US aggression, has been lost to the internet. A good source of information is old encyclopedia's where the truth can't be altered by the US. And again unfortunately, being propagandized leads most people to not even want to know the truth.

I think this is the link I supplied that tells us about Saudi support in the billions. In any case, it's one that I had posted with the hope of some of the people who are interested would take the time to read. It may not be the right one because I've posted several but it's sure not going to hurt anybody to read it and find out. http://rt.com/news/166836-isis-isil-al-qaeda-iraq/ Americans: Reading this could cause you to go blind. Or at least grow hair on the palms of your hands!

I found it out by showing an interest in the facts. One of the sources for that information has come from RT news which doesn't have any political interest in making up anti-US propaganda over this particular fact. However, if that doesn't sit well with you then I invite you to challenge it. Too bad you didn't take the time to read some of the information I supply to you people. I can lead a horse to water but I can't make him drink! Take part in this discussion in an informed manner. Doing otherwise is not helping. I'll try to find the link from about a week ago. Then it's up to you to read it and rebut or agree.

Is being opposed to the US slaughter of women and children truly horrific? Challenge any of the truths I've stated if you can but don't start babbling like a frustrated little girl who's found her hypocrisy exposed. Or whatever you think will work for you. What is definitely working is the US apologists are having nightmares over being exposed here. Ain't it awwwwwfullll!

You might be able to get some sympathy from the forum admin with that one? Of course my position is that hate of evil is legitimate and should be expressed in no few words. You, on the other hand are completely tonguetied for an answer and so need to go on the personal attack. I understand that you can't help it because you have been conditioned to support US military evil. Now run away, run away!

A worthwhile article but probably too deep for most of the people on this forum. Some true in my opinion and some aimed at US partisan domestic politics. It mentions that the media is still neglecting to tell the true story. Fixing that would be the best thing that could be done in the short term at least. In the meantime, RT news is bringing some of the truths to light! It's sad that so many Americans and even Canadians have been so propagandized by the US that they are afraid to read the truth. You posted the link so what stands out for you as important? This could be the basis of a worthwhile discussion here!

Thank you for your answer but I'm not going to go so far as to call either of them freedom fighters yet, even though you've hintd that you do. Is that supposed to be your excuse for an answer? This was a question posed for people who want to try to be honest about the ME situation the US has caused, not for ignorant Nazis who see all the slaughter as legitimate and necessary for protecting US access to oil resources. (With apologies to the Nazis)

Should the US bomb all these stolen Humvees before they get to Syria and are used to fight against Assad? http://rt.com/usa/167436-isis-twitter-michelle-obama-hashtag/ We have to ask ourselves the question because Assad is the good guy now if ISIS is the bad guys. Or wait, is ISIS the good guys and Assad still the bad guy?

Wlth billions of dollars in the bank from Saudi supporters. Geez kid, you can't get it more wrong than that!

If you have no clue what entity is behind ISIS then read the primer I supplied from RT news that explains it all. And for others, let's move on to more important details. for instance: http://rt.com/op-edge/167304-iraq-usa-isis-sectarianism/ Is this American right that the US is getting exactly what it wanted in Iraq now that ISIS is slaughtering people at a rate that is at least beginning to approach the rate at which the US did it? Not to suggest that they will ever have the WMD's to reach the US rate of slaughter?

ISIS or ISIL that is. I read this comment on an RT blog and it shook me to think of it because I couldn't really come up with an answer that I could feel comfortable with? ------------------------------------------- Charles Edward Frith @charlesfrith Follow Remember Kids. ISIS are freedom fighters when executing soldiers in Syria and Terrorists when executing in Iraq ------------------------------------------- Can any of you? Can you answer the question posed by the title and feel good and comfortable with yourself?

Many, many times my boy but I'm not here to butter my bread for you. I'm here to give you the facts and hope that some of you have the cajones to understand them or rebut them. Now how about you getting back to the issues and show what you're made of? If I could be so presumptious, why did you ask? Really, why? Do you think there's something that I'm not getting right. I'm more than willing to dance with you on any topic you choose if it's relevant to this discussion.

Your solution would cause even more problems and is uninformed. The correct solution to the problem is to resurrect Saddam. That being quite impossible then the next best thing is a leader who can bring Iraq back to the prosperity and cooperation amongst the various sects that it had under Saddam. I hope you can understand that but if you have been US propagandized then you no doubt won't. ISIS is most likely an unfortunate phase Iraq must now go through because of the US led wars.

I see you as a US propagandized lemming who lacks the intelligence or decency to deal with my challenge. Wanna play more insulting games or do you want to show us what you're made of? Unless you're completely brain dead then you'll know by now what the challenge is. And once again, for you. Hatred of evil is my position. Because: It's j-----ied and war------d. Comprehende? Does your interest extend to children in Iraq or Vietnam or Cambodia or other countries where the US has slaughtered them from 30,000'?

Read my previous post and see if you can understand what I said. I'm not expecting that you will, or at least be able to admit that you understand.

It's you that's out of line and insulting when there's no real need for it. I'll never make any apologies for being direct and honest about the US and it's crimes against humanity. Nor will I ever stop criticizing the US when the criticism is JUSTIFIED AND WARRANTED! Not for any insulting creeps or for any authority who proposes to protect their reputations. To do so would lower me to your level of US apologist for murder.