WestCoastRunner

Well I'm glad to hear that on your last point except you didn't say what that certain point was. As far as your first point, could you expand on that please.

Wow! You seem to have missed the point there is a test to determine if the fetus is infected. If it's positive the mother should have the right to an abortion, however the Catholic Church has been silent on this issue. What are your thoughts if it's confirmed the fetus has the virus. Do you think the mother should be able to abort? I would like your opinion because you are so quick to attack a woman's right to abortion.

Exactly, this thread is about Canada.

Have you checked out the traits of a baby born while the mother has the virus?

Justice doesn't care who's guilty or innocent. It's all about the legal representation.

What are you talking about.

This is a shame that you are comparing the flu to this virus.

The Catholic Church is silent on the Zika virus. Meanwhile, Latin America is predominantly Catholic forbidding abortion in all cases and frown upon birth control in many villages. Shame on them.

Thanks Waldo. That's great news for Canadians.

So what?

The question is pro-lifers fighting to refuse the right of women to abort these fetuses.

Would you want your girlfriend or wife to carry forward with this.

Obviously you haven't researched this.

I have a deal for you. I'll respond to this thread if you will respond to women being impregnated with the Zica virus and choosing to abort.

Wow. You actually used the search feature on my responses. Cool. I'm honoured.

Seriously. This is ridiculous.

I'm waiting for facts and the case to unfold. Sorry. I can't give more than that.

I got your response. It seemed cool to me.

Sanders demographics are young white students. That won't carry him very far.

Not at all. Are you crazy?

Please provide a cite as to their questionable foundation.

I have a problem with posts that attack women and abortions in the status updates but yet they shy away from defending those beliefs. I will continue to call out these posters but this is my main concern about status updates. There is no recourse to call out these inflammatory posts. I try and start a new thread about the issues but the instigator hides behind the status updates. It seems to be a cop out but I'm not sure how to hold these posters accountable to their updates. I take everything posted on this site as game for legitimate debate. If we don't hold status updates as legitimate opinions, what's the point of status updates?

This is the problem with pro-lifers. They espouse their narrow minded beliefs without thinking of the profound implications.

I won't post an opinion until all the facts are in. I initially defended him until women started crawling out of the woodwork. I won't make that mistake again.

Maybe you mean it's going well for the defendant.