WestCoastRunner

That college student living down the street from you could be turning tricks right under your nose.

Sanders isn't going anywhere.

Does anyone think that Bloomberg would enter the race?

But how would that benefit trump. It would seem to me that Bloomberg would trump trump.

He seems so unpresidential that I wouldn't trust him (as an American of course) to uphold and gain women's rights. He comes across as a grandfather to my grandkids.

How would that benefit trump.

Why would trump like it?

Bloomberg would be so fascinating to follow. I hope he enters the race. He crosses boundaries between republicans and democrats that it would be simply breathtaking.

Even if he were to become president do you really think he would be able to withstand the lobby groups. This is a major pipe dream.

I will let the mods answer this.

I certainly don't believe they were lying or colluded.

Of course not. But as I have suggested earlier, there is no fair justice. It's all about the money. I question the ability of the prosecution team.

My point is that this is what typically happens in assault causes reported by women. These posts confirm that victims are attacked over and over again.

But, but, earlier you stated they could be telling the truth.

I have read the live blog. I still won't answer. There is a huge difference in being there in person and reading live blogs.

Right. So Canadian posters could pick up on that and re-quote. This is why I'm asking for clarification on Greg's non concern.

Shoulda, woulda, coulda. This all comes out in court. The judge will determine the relevance.

I haven't been present in court. Let's be realistic.

I'm not the judge. Geez.

Their honesty is the fact they even pursued this in the first place.

I'm quite frankly surprised at the prosecution for not calling more witnesses regarding mental health, former colleagues etc. Perhaps because they didn't have full knowledge of the emails. But again, it doesn't excuse the assaults. The judge will determine if those assaults actually took place with no reasonable doubt.

So you think they are embarrassing and feel the need to point out a handjob after the fact when you think they could possibly be telling the truth? Wonderful.

I am defending the right for victims to have their day in court without being called embarrassing or whether they gave the accused a handjob.

What do you mean he's not concerned? what is he not concerned about?