WestCoastRunner

Let's see what the judge determines, however I agree the case will likely get tossed. he has another case coming up in June. Will be interesting to see if this case gets tossed.

Are you sure? The reason I ask is because I read something exactly about this earlier. Wasn't details about the Paul Bernardo case published in the states even with the publication ban? Or maybe that's different than libel laws.

Exactly.

The fourth witness is called to help dismiss collusion. Again, whether they met up with ghomeshi or not after the fact doesn't excuse the assault. Clearly these women have insecurity issues (by returning) but it doesn't mean these assaults didn't happen.

Describing victims as embarrassing serves no one.

For one thing, he is allowing the fourth witness. Had it been tried in front of a jury, he may have disallowed it. He has said that he can tell the difference between what's relevant and what isn't more than a jury can.

Sanders like all the others will pander to lobby groups. He's no different.

Since this site is hosted in Texas it wouldn't be held to Canadian laws would it?

If I were an American I would trust Clinton more than Sanders to fight for and retain women's rights. Especially because she is a woman.

That could apply to all the candidates.

These women aren't embarrassing themselves and that's a disgraceful statement applied to all assault victims. Whether he is found guilty or not, he is a despicable man who preys on young women to fulfil his sick needs.

What relevance does a hand job have to do with the case? Even if it's after the fact. Let's remember that this is tried in front of a judge which I think may be in favour of the complainants in this case.Whoops, I quoted the wrong post.

Bill is doing great.

What a s..t answer. Is that all you got.

So why bring her husband into her capabilities?

Hillary is running for the POTUS. Give her the respectability she deserves.

I would too!

Bill isn't running.

I would like to find out who gets 'ignored' the most.

Ok?

How is that possible? That's like saying men vote without their testicles.

Gloria Steinem made a comment that young women have not yet come against gender bias in the workforce which partially explains their support of sanders. If they had any inkling of what's to come, they may quickly change their support to Hillary. I tend to agree.

Good for him!

Is that a good thing?

They need to shake it up.