Leaderboard

The Liberal's chickens are coming home to roost. More Canadians are pushing back from pent up frustration. ...and it has nothing to do with Donald Trump.

The only people bothered by this are the aboriginal guilt industry and lefty snowflakes.

Only in twisted multi-cult Canada could "indigenous aboriginals" get labeled as "immigrants" by a viceregal appointed by a queen living across the ocean in the UK. ...can't make this comical stuff up.

He can't answer right now, he's facing Mecca

Canada's Governor General says "aboriginals" are immigrants, and the viceregal can't be wrong as the queen's representative. The imperial - colonial force is strong in this one.

im·mi·grant noun a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country. What "foreign country" did aboriginals come to live in?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2io596_7U9o

Kind of like negative billing. Anyone who can't be bothered to respond to your crackpot assertions must therefore agree with them. That's really all you have. It is also why no legitimate source will give your nonsense legitimacy by responding to it.

Spell it out. Talk, instead of dancing. What's the answer? Is the answer that one of the Saudi/Egyptian hijackers traveled through Iran? Is this what you're going with or am I going beyond your bubble of knowledge and you're only able to discuss the headline and nothing else?

Well stated and continues your original point.. That of course is a huge debate with theologians . Now not speaking ancient Hebrew, Greek, Roman, Armaic, I can only imagine the challenge of trying to translate ancient languages into a modern context and not change the meaning. I only know when you translate back and forth in the above languages and add Arabic, there is a great deal of chance something gets mistranslated because of the lack of equivalency in words. When you read the Old Testament the commenyary by Rabbiahs is as important to understand as the actual words and even they are of no help. In theory one sentence in the Old Testament could have an infinite number of meanings and thus the Talmud was created as a code of argument to keep the arguments flowing as to what those possible meanings could be. No sentence is meant to be read literally. That surface level is only where you start. It's a common misconception for Christians to read the Old Testament and stop at the first literal level because they do so when reading say the Gospels. Now I am no scholar, but I have witnessed some incredible debates between Christians on some of the Gospels and what they mean. All I can tell you is I enjoy when people debate the possible meanings and never stop at just one. I would be fascinated to be able to travel a hundred years or so and see the next translation of the Bible. I find reading the KJ version a lot of work. Its like reading Shakespeare but me personally I don't see the newer easy to understand versions of having changed the Old Testament. I defer to Christians on the New Testament. Mr. Hacker I read the Bible like I do Aesop's fables. I see them as allegories created to provide examples in stories to help people otherwise understand difficult concepts. " the mistake in listening to Jewish people debate is taking it too seriously.. remember we created Marxism, Groucho, Gummo, Harpo.." Rue 555 .

F-35 performs at Paris Air Show....3D turns without thrust vectoring.

Are you for real? This is what I asked you; "What do you recommend Trump do about the Warmbier situation?" And you said; "send condolances to his family". If you have no idea what i'm on about, then you should probably put down the bottle. I'm getting tired of getting into a discussion with you only to find out later that you don't know what the fuck is going on.

Amazing the influence Donald Trump has, even on people in other countries!

Ignore is for children, for chickenshits.

Too bad his paper on 9-11 got him put under review from his teaching job due to it's lack of any rigorous peer review. But it provided fodder for the conspiacists, to this day.

So........not going to answer the question, then. Okay.

DOP and the Gang? Do we drive around in a funky van solving crimes? Do I get to sit on the hot chick's lap?

Considering how amazing the actual story of evolution is, one would think that any sane religion would be doing its best to incorporate the incredible findings...but no...many resist. The Carboniferous Period is my personal fav...500 ft tall horsetails?? Dragonflies 4 feet across? That's soooo frickin' cool.

The Muslim woman who took her burqua to court that she can do her citizenship with her face covered - and won - had contributed greatly to the rise in hate crimes against Muslims, I bet. When you come to a house that showed you generosity of kindness, and you repay that by challenging its own rules, and you manage to upset what's traditional - and impose your own on them - of course, there'll be deep resentments. What do you think? Funny, the Islamic talking head woman (in that photo) , who was interviewed on CTV and CBC didn't see that as the most likely reason for the rise, and no one in the media brought it up, either. They're all pointing at Harper. Dough-heads.

By hating you, of course.

Read the article, and found no reference to anyone blaming Bush et al. So why are you making shit up? Oh that's why: you're a crackpot. I'm curious as to why an "anti-western" paper like the Times (a member in good-standing of the Global Jewish Islamo-leftist Media Conspiracy) would publish a story about 200 of their buddies getting killed. The fact that war doodz like you bleat about the veracity of reportage that reflects badly on the Great Crusade, while unquestioningly swallowing stories like this, is a testament to the power of the human mind to simultaneously hold two contradictary ideas without bursting into flames. Who is? Because he doesn't have any.