Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Question - when these DSA psychopaths talk about "free Palestine" - what do they mean? Freeing Palestine for gays? Freeing Palestine for women to be educated? What do these idlots mean exactly? And where is this "Palestine"? Are they talking about the city in Ohio?
  3. F*ck are you stûpid.... This is what sitting in your basement in Scarborough all day pretending to be American does to your brain.
  4. You are wrong. You ara always wrong to ^LIE What you quoted ^here is the opinion of ONE JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, who "dissenting in part." LMAO;
  5. Coercing someone is forcing them. Grab a dictionary, stupid. Putting people in a position where they have to either: lose their job, during a huge economic downturn, and be forced to work in a different career, or get a dangerous jab that they don't want MEETS THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF FORCED you lying dung-beetle. You can't help being a piece of shit... it's exactly like you're a piece of shit.
  6. LOL - of course the degenerate Marxist Jew-hating scumbag Charlie Angus, flush with Soros cash, jumps in to lie about the Canadian graves. Canada should have moved these graves to Canadian soil in 2005 rather than leave these guys buried anywhere that these Jihadi scumbags were going to take over. This was a failure of the Canadian government, as they should have known that the Hamas genocidal scumbags would start tunneling under every cementary in the entire "country". What a joke.
  7. Facts are facts... And by most measures, Harper was a failure. When he left he had the worst average GDP growth of any previous PM, the worst average annual growth in employment, the second worst change in unemployment, the worst annual growth of goods and services exports, the second worst share of income going to the richest 1%, and the worst average annual growth in real GDP per capita. He was a failure.... If not for benefitting from high oil prices and low interest rate environments he wouldn't have lasted as long as he did,
  8. No. I think when millions in PAC money is directed to politicians the way the evidence I posted previously and the perps are charged, that many others did not get caught and are bought and paid for...and I think buying politicians is a "bad" thing.
  9. I mean sure murder is always a choice...
  10. 1) So what's your issue, if taxpayer money wasn't given to developers? 2) FYI it was the Liberals who caused the bubble that burst on these developers, dummy. Units were sold for what the market would bear. That's capitalism, dumbfack. Are you really that comfortable in your socialist bubble that you're just going after capitalism now? I'll type this really slowly for you so that you can read it: HOMES WERE MORE AFFORDABLE UNDER HARPER. RENTS WERE MORE AFFORDABLE UNDER HARPER. That comes from comparing the rise in rents/prices vs the rise in incomes. The FAILURE AWARD of the last 20 years here in Canada goes directly to the LPoC, and it's not even close. The LPoC made homes and rents less affordable, and they gave taxpayer money to "developers" who you think are evil. It's like the trifecta of sucking, donkey. 😂 That's just basic stupidity. Prices have basically doubled every ten years in the lower mainland since 1950.
  11. Well of course it just goes without saying you'll notice something that just isn't there. You people do that just about everytime now.
  12. It's NOT ad hominem, it's appeal to popularity. LMAO
  13. Abuse is subjective. You think the mere existence of people having Free Speech here is abuse.
  14. tl/dr transcript see end posted
  15. No, I mean they sold affordable rental units to corporate landlords and developers so they could further profit. When did any liberal government buy market affordable housing units to sell to corporations? Yes, the average house priced increased almost 70% during Harper's term. Funny enough it went up 62% during Trudeaus and people were still buying homes. Go figure... That's all you have, and are... Simple Harper was a failure.... There is a reason the 2015 election was a beat down.
  16. For someone that bîtches and moans about ad hominem attacks, you sure do employ it as a tactic often. In fact, I would guess 90+% of your posts are personal insults.
  17. And where is "Mark Carney is facing a parliamentary ethics probe after Conservatives raised concerns "" Except in your LOSER head??? LOL LOL LOL
  18. Read the whole thing. "Congress could—consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so. " And further down: "Consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress could amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so. " I am correct. I am always correct.
  19. How could taxpayer money be used to sell? No, they sold affordable units to landlords and developers who profited from those purchases by taking those units off the market and seeing both rent and home prices further increase with lesser supply. Personally, I think they should have stayed out of it and let the market price find it's own level without the governments assistance, but if they buy at cost or below it's a net positive for rent to own owners, and minimal risk to taxpayers with the mortgage being an asset, not a liability. People in Metro Vancouver or populated areas of BC likely have little sympathy for your ~$375k - $400k average NB home price that has doubled in the last decade. How did Liberals help Liberals here?
  20. Today
  21. You dodged. I'm sure you thought it was clever and that we wouldn't notice but.....
  22. Ahhh! Well then you're just lying. At no point in time did harper or PP sell off 800 thousand low income housing units. That is a simple lie. Not hard in the slightest. Housing prices were below where they should have been when harper came in, harper turned the economy around and got things: And not surprisingly people started buying homes again. Prices went up. That's expected. Let me use Simple Math that even you can understand. If you consider 100 to be the average normal price in a healthy market, and the price falls to $50 during the crutch end years, then climbs back up to 100, That looks like a 100% increase. Sounds impressive but in reality you're making up for lost ground for the most part However, if you start at 100 and then jump to 150, it only looks like a 50 percent increase but it's now WAAAY above what's affordable. I'm sure you can see the difference. Justin was the second one Not to you apparently Harper was a runaway success and even his opponents generally acknowledge this. He had one of the best economies and best responses to one of the greatest recessions since the 1930s. He did far better than most and his economic policies were groundbreaking at the time. Where other governments have to bail out Industries for the most part he actually found ways to keep the banks afloat while making Canadians money instead of costing them Financially speaking harper was almost without a doubt the best prime minister we have ever had and this is why in poll after poll he tends to score in the top three often at the very top when people ask who was the best prime minister. All you're doing is showing your political ignorance and partisanship when you make stupid statements like that. You can say what you like but the reality is canada did better financially under harper given the circumstances of the time that at any other time in history with any other prime minister in history. We barely felt the recession compared to most people
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...